Wednesday at Stoke
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 22,284
- Supports
- Time Travel
His passing is quite poor. I don’t see why you’d rather not give the opportunity to someone like Collyer and invest in an upgrade elsewhere.
Because you don't spend so much money on somebody who isn't going to be 1st choice! I have no clue, what some of you guys are thinking, we became 8th, ffs, we aren't in the CL, we aren't in contention for the league - this is the time to form a capable 1st team yet you have people around acting as if 20 million on a 28 yo is something "you just have to do". For what?! Give those minutes to younger players. Even if they don't manage to establish themselves, you find it out and you can sell them with 1st team experience. There is no fecking downside. Only, ONLY, exception is when you go intentionally for a treble and you need any cog in your system to be on point at a specific point in time.How about - he is an excellent option for a second choice DMF, for a low price, and we would be too naive to assume that one DMF can play all games we have to play in four different competitions?
This assumes Casemiro is getting sold, of course
I cannot understand how this myth was able to establish itself. The only good things in the last few games were the results and the title. The final was a wholesome group effort while the other games contained of barely average performances where the team, with him in it, gave more than enough chances away for the other team to beat us. Those weren't good games. And while they may have been his best - it was barely above average, even though I can understand how the followers perception is skewed having witnessed next to no real midfielders playing in midfield for us. Not even speaking of the one shocker against Brighton he managed to chip in even in that period.I think he was partly a victim of EtH not being flexible with his tactics, adapting to available players. It's not a coincidence that his best games were in last games of the season - where all he had to was be the ball winner.
If EtH plans to be flexible with his tactics or play more of the counter attacking, pragmatic football that helped close out the season well - we should consider buying Amrabat for a squad player role but if EtH is going to do what he did for most of last season (attempt to play a possession based, fast pressing, fast passing game) - wrong player for the system, even as a depth piece
We got to trust ineos won’t do that. We’re operating with experts in the field nowWe could end up paying more than 20m euros to pay in installments as well presumably. Hopefully not obviously
Don’t forget Oyedelle.Would rather keep Hannibal and have him trained in a deeper role than spend money on Amrabat. Even in his "good games at the end of the season" he was poor. Hannibal, Gore and Collyer should be expected to do as well as he's done or more likely better.
I’ve heard that he’s settled down.Don’t forget Oyedelle.
Because you don't spend so much money on somebody who isn't going to be 1st choice! I have no clue, what some of you guys are thinking, we became 8th, ffs, we aren't in the CL, we aren't in contention for the league - this is the time to form a capable 1st team yet you have people around acting as if 20 million on a 28 yo is something "you just have to do". For what?! Give those minutes to younger players. Even if they don't manage to establish themselves, you find it out and you can sell them with 1st team experience. There is no fecking downside. Only, ONLY, exception is when you go intentionally for a treble and you need any cog in your system to be on point at a specific point in time.
I don't get it - the club has been run through the shits with deadwood players. Yet here we are
I cannot understand how this myth was able to establish itself. The only good things in the last few games were the results and the title. The final was a wholesome group effort while the other games contained of barely average performances where the team, with him in it, gave more than enough chances away for the other team to beat us. Those weren't good games. And while they may have been his best - it was barely above average, even though I can understand how the followers perception is skewed having witnessed next to no real midfielders playing in midfield for us. Not even speaking of the one shocker against Brighton he managed to chip in even in that period.
It was a good decision to give him a chance, his profile to a degree seemed a good fit but he didn't cut it. We spent more money to make it a loan to not be stuck with him in case it blows up in our face.
You are aware how much money we spent on Mount who clearly is not first choice, right? And 20 million euros more for Amrabat is not that much money, by the way, not at all, considering he won us FA Cup. Most of us would rather keep him and sell McTominay, but clearly United executives disagree
Either way, it was just announced that United is not going to sign him, so it's a moot point, now
Bizarre that anyone wanted us to buy him off the back of that season.
Didn’t we turn down Sabitzer for £17m? I’d say he would’ve been a far better permanent signingHe's a good squad player, I'd definitely take him if we can negotiate the ~£17m buy option to £12-13m. For a 28 year old squad player with reasonable wages, that's a bargain.
We aren't getting anyone better for that price and Amrabat is good enough to be a rotational double-pivot option for us. Just don't expect him to be a lone DM.
Didn’t we turn down Sabitzer for £17m? I’d say he would’ve been a far better permanent signing
Definitely. If PSR wasn’t a factor then 10-15 mil for a squad player wouldn’t be an issue. But that’s how it is. I’d like to see Collyer given a chance either way.His passing is quite poor. I don’t see why you’d rather not give the opportunity to someone like Collyer and invest in an upgrade elsewhere.
He was decent in a backs to the wall performance against City, that's it.Bizarre that anyone would want to judge a play off the back of that season. Especially one that immediately started doing better as soon as ETH tweaked the system after the Palace loss and provided a better environment for the players.
Yep. I also quite like the idea of being ruthless and returning to the mentality of having to play bloody well just to stay at United. Every player should always be on trial. Amrabat didn’t make the grade, no problem - shake his hand and wish him well. But don’t sign him just because he’s cheap and can do a job. Why reward mediocrity again?He was decent in a backs to the wall performance against City, that's it.
So because we made a mistake with Mount it makes it a better idea to do another mistake? Thats not very convincing. He also didn't won us the FA Cup he was one of many who played well on the occasion. Against a City team that didn't seem to bother about preparing for us.You are aware how much money we spent on Mount who clearly is not first choice, right? And 20 million euros more for Amrabat is not that much money, by the way, not at all, considering he won us FA Cup. Most of us would rather keep him and sell McTominay, but clearly United executives disagree
Either way, it was just announced that United is not going to sign him, so it's a moot point, now
Thats how it is - you get a chance and then you take it or leave it. Was it bad timing? Perhaps but it certainly wasn't just bad timing. Imagine, we finally got rid of Donny and there is some talk about McTominay and Eriksen. Is there some deadwood warning light popping off with some of you?Bizarre that anyone would want to judge a play off the back of that season. Especially one that immediately started doing better as soon as ETH tweaked the system after the Palace loss and provided a better environment for the players.
His short passing game is quite good actually, and some of long passes/switches he executes are good too.I do feel Amrabat is being done a bit of a disservice with regards to passing. He may not be as adventurous as many of the others but he's also nowhere near as erratic as most of them. He's a high volume passer and bar a couple of glaring mistakes, I think his pass completion percentage is probably in the higher percentiles