So the 3-5-2

didn't someone once say something like if you haven't got 2 top centre backs play 3?

A kind of solidity in numbers type job?
That and the chance to see Rooney and VP properly up front, with Mata as well, makes this a goer.

Will be really interesting how it all pans out.

On the other hand we're used to wingers, but then our wingers haven't been that good for a while now.


Anyone who was active in the match day threads last year would remember the constant moaning about the inane crosses being thumped across the box with no one ever getting on the end of them. I honestly believe that after watching last years performances going without wingers for a while will be a blessing.
 
Last edited:
Anyone else think this will be too lacking in pace upfront to work with Rooney and van persie?
 
Anyone else think this will be too lacking in pace upfront to work with Rooney and van persie?

Nope. It doesn't require pace up front. It's all about timing and having a shit load of triangles around the box with a goal threat from 4 players. Correct movement is far more important than the speed of movement.
 
Anyone else think this will be too lacking in pace upfront to work with Rooney and van persie?

It has crossed my mind but you don't know if you don't try.

Pace won't matter so much if the oppositions defense plays deep against us but against higher back lines we would probably be better of using Welbeck or Hernandez to run in behind.
 
Anyone else think this will be too lacking in pace upfront to work with Rooney and van persie?

The beauty of the 3-5-2 is that one of the strikers has to always stay up front. He's the outlet man. That man will be RVP. The hard running comes from Herrera and Mata with the wingbacks flying wide. Not to mention Rooney will be also be the man running at goal from a deeper position.

RVP will be our main weapon. The formation can quite easily be 3-4-2-1 and that's quite exciting.
 
Anyone else think this will be too lacking in pace upfront to work with Rooney and van persie?
You don't really need pace to break up teams, you just need to pass the ball at the right tempo and move in a way to create space while doing so.
 
Would love to see the match stats of our game against LA Galaxy. We passed the ball around very well. Perhaps we'll have Barcelona like numbers? or maybe, hate to say it, Brendan's Liverpool like numbers?
 
It will certainly be interesting to see how we adapt to this formation. I don't have a problem with it per say but still its a tricky formation to play and takes a lot of training and hard work. Will it suit the premier league, only time will tell I guess. Its is a bold move thats for sure but then again I haven't seen many people with cajones as big as Louis Van Gaal.
 
3-5-2 is an excellent formation, provided you have quality wing backs. Think Cafu and Roberto Carlos for Brazil in WC2002. Also, the most central of the three defenders should be a libero who is good a distribution and able to come forward as an additional midfielder. Will be interesting to see if Shaw and Valencia are able to adapt as wing backs, and we definitely need another experienced central defender for sure. But in LVG, we trust.
 
The beauty of the 3-5-2 is that one of the strikers has to always stay up front. He's the outlet man. That man will be RVP. The hard running comes from Herrera and Mata with the wingbacks flying wide. Not to mention Rooney will be also be the man running at goal from a deeper position.

RVP will be our main weapon. The formation can quite easily be 3-4-2-1 and that's quite exciting.
Is this more likely to benefit RVP in terms of goals or Rooney? Aka is RVP worth 2m more than Rooney in Fantasy Football!??
 
Is this more likely to benefit RVP in terms of goals or Rooney? Aka is RVP worth 2m more than Rooney in Fantasy Football!??
I think Rooney will naturally wonder around, it's in his nature to go chasing. RVP seem's happier to stay up top and test the line, waiting for the ball when he get's his chance.

He is also our Penalty taker, and takes his fair share of corners/free kicks. Only risk factor is his fitness really, if he can stay fit he's guaranteed points.
 
didn't someone once say something like if you haven't got 2 top centre backs play 3?

A kind of solidity in numbers type job?
That and the chance to see Rooney and VP properly up front, with Mata as well, makes this a goer.

Will be really interesting how it all pans out.

On the other hand we're used to wingers, but then our wingers haven't been that good for a while now.

i think this is the benefit of the system, smalling, jones and evans are all good players, but were too shaky playing as a pair, with one covering any mistakes it'll be easier on them. I also think it benefits a new central midfield, as in the same sense, one of the wide defenders can cover the midfield if a player comes through with the ball.
 
i think this is the benefit of the system, smalling, jones and evans are all good players, but were too shaky playing as a pair, with one covering any mistakes it'll be easier on them. I also think it benefits a new central midfield, as in the same sense, one of the wide defenders can cover the midfield if a player comes through with the ball.

I'm really coming round to it. I know we haven't seen wingbacks in the prem since the mid 90s when a few teams seemed to do it.

However, Rooney and Mata being able to focus on attacking, rather than pissing about tracking back from wide positions or having to always make up a third man behind the ball in midfield could really bring them on another gear.

Does depend a lot on the wingbacks though. Shaw and Rafael/Valencia, will really have to adapt, to make sure they're doing both sides of the game. Hardest position is the wingback.
 
The back 5 (counting wingbacks) are going to be a very flexible unit. Already against LA Galaxy, we've seen how it becomes in effect a back 4 when one of the wingbacks push up. In attack, this means we've swapped out the winger on the opposing flank for a central player.

One of the problems with playing three centrebacks is how it wastes a man against single-striker formations. I'm wondering if we saw how LvG is going to counteract this in the second half against LAG (I was very sleepy by then) by using Fletcher (potentially Carrick in the future) in there who can step up into midfield, essentially playing half-back.
 


According to this guy who really follow our youth players, we're also playing 3-5-2 in our U18 setups. If this is the case the long term vision of our club is to play 3-5-2, it's not just something for the first team. Talks a lot on how our youth system is moving forward under van Gaal, very interesting.
 
3-5-2 is an excellent formation, provided you have quality wing backs. Think Cafu and Roberto Carlos for Brazil in WC2002. Also, the most central of the three defenders should be a libero who is good a distribution and able to come forward as an additional midfielder. Will be interesting to see if Shaw and Valencia are able to adapt as wing backs, and we definitely need another experienced central defender for sure. But in LVG, we trust.

^ This...

No formation is perfect but this probably suits van Gaal and our personal best right now. In fact sign Vidal and we could start this...

----------------de Gea---------------
----Jones--Carrick--Evans--
Rafeal-Herrera-Vidal-Shaw
------------------Mata----------------
-----------RVP------Rooney------

Tell me that wouldn't be sey :drool:!
 
^ This...

No formation is perfect but this probably suits van Gaal and our personal best right now. In fact sign Vidal and we could start this...

----------------de Gea---------------
----Jones--Carrick--Evans--
Rafeal-Herrera-Vidal-Shaw
------------------Mata----------------
-----------RVP------Rooney------

Tell me that wouldn't be sey :drool:!
Carrick has great positional sense and ability to read the game but he's not physical enough and his jumping is very poor. Too many times he's left us exposed to headers when he played as CB.
 
I don’t see this formation as our permanent setup for years to come, but for this season I think it’s worth a try. It allows us to accommodate two strikers and one number 10 on the pitch, so probably suits our current personnel the best.

3 CBs: I think that Evans, Smalling and Jones can form a very solid partnership. Ideally we can play Jonny on the left (as he is very comfortable with his left foot), Chris on the right (knows how to cover a RB) and Phil in the middle, so that he can break forward at times. Jones isn’t exactly a midfielder, but given some passing options around I believe he can do a job there.

Midfield: Herrera + 1 defensively sound midfielder. I like the idea of two box-to-box players who can contribute on both sides of the pitch, but we only have one at the moment.

Attack: To be honest I don’t think this is some magical way to accommodate RVP, Rooney and Mata on the pitch. This would work if we had wingbacks ala Di Maria (perfect for that role IMO), but with our current wide options I just don’t see it.

From what I’ve seen, Shaw main strength is defending, and he’s not very good at going forward. I’m not concerned about that as he’s not a finished article, and in my opinion he can be a very good wingback if his speed and stamina is used correctly. I would be worried if he was Buttner type of player- good going forward, shit at defending.

On the other side of the pitch, I think Rafael would make a very good wingback. Unfortunately, if he spends half season injured again, than we are stuck with Valencia who I don’t like in that role. He’s not productive in the final third, and gets caught out of position while defending way too often.
We can play it with one of RVP or Rooney, Januzaj or Welbeck as the 2 strikers and Kagawa or Mata behind them.
No system makes Rooney/RVP/Mata suddenly have threatening speed.
I can definitely see Welbeck being used a lot, especially in the big games when we look to play on the break. Or Januzaj as the other option if he impresses in the role
It always applies, you need off the ball runners. You won't be able to penetrate with a team full of players who want the ball into feet. You need players who will run of the ball commit men and stretch teams. Pacy players.
I think that Welbeck might prove crucial for this formations to work. It really does suit him, the second striker role, moving to the side, playing those one-two with midfielders and wingbacks, while one of Rooney/Van Persie stays as main striker in the middle. I really think this is the best way to play this formation.

Januzaj could play on either side of the striker or as a 10. If anything I think it could bring the best out of him as he would have to do less defensive work.
Not sure why you don't see him as a number 10. I think he's be fantastic there. His vision, intelligence and weight of pass are fantastic. He has all the attributes to play there.
Januzaj would also be very good in that second striker role, his movement with the ball would cause the opposition a lot of trouble. He can play as a number 10 too.

A few promising signs early on that will improve as the players become accustomed to it, even if it will be against infinitely superior opposition than LA Galaxy.
From a defensive perspective it looked quite good. Agree with bishblaise about how much more difficult it is to maintain your defensive shape and keep your backline three aligned, opposed to a back two/four where it's pretty simplistic with the right coaching and able players. As it is, Smalling, Jones and Evans were impressive in their positional play, save for LA exploiting space down Evans' side in the early stages. When one of the three pressed the opposition and came out of defence, Fletcher did well to momentarily fill in also. We could well be playing with two number #8's next season if we sign Vidal however, so the three defenders might have to sit back more and be more cautious.
The main concern is the wingbacks for me
. You could see how uncomfortable Shaw was in that role right from the off and playing high up the pitch didn't suit his natural game whereby his defensive work is more impressive than the attacking outlet he would provide. It's his first game, so not much should be read into it and his attacking game will improve, but it takes emphasis away from his solid defensive game and expects too much from him offensively. However, in the long run the right side looks more of a weakness. Valencia was again inept going forward and looked out of his depth, but he should do better there with more time on the ball in the final third. You'd think Rafael would displace Valencia, but being deployed as a fullback might be more befitting of his ability. He will certainly be a better attacking outlet than Valencia though.
The midfield looked good. Very compact, good pressing and it's such a huge relief to have someone like Herrera who can play at such a high pace whether it's running with the ball, linking with teammates or darting into space. He was exceptional and will be hugely important for this system to work. Fletcher anchored quite well, but as I said, we will likely sign another midfielder, so it's getting the balance right. Good energy, good tactical discipline and good interplay at times. Probably the most encouraging signs ahead of the defence and attack funnily enough.
Onto the attack. Personally I think this system really requires a pacy forward - Welbeck in our case - who can stretch play and supplement movement, otherwise the attack is far too static. It's a system where all three of van Persie, Mata and Rooney would be deployed in their correct positions, but it isn't the conundrum to playing all three at once and quite frankly I don't think there is one. If LVG really does plan to use this formation frequently, Welbeck is essential out of our current options and then it's a toss-up between van Persie and Rooney.
In summary, the centre backs will improve and develop a better understanding of their role with more game time. However, the wingbacks could be a potential weakness. The midfield looks very positive with Herrera and Mata and the forward line still doesn't solve the van Persie/Rooney conundrum. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
This is an excellent post and I agree with everything you said. I have exactly the same worries.

As far as transfers are concerned, it doesn’t change anything. We need a defensive minded midfielder and centre back.
Also, if we are to play this formation on regular basis then I think it’s time for Kagawa and Hernandez to go.

Sorry for the length of this post but I've been away for a few days and I could only gather some quotes on my phone.
 
Was just posting this in the Southampton thread, but it's more suitable for this one actually:

Did someone already mention in this thread that it is basically because of Ronald Koeman we are playing 5-3-2 with United?

He introduced it at Feyenoord last season when Pelle was injured. I can't remember one of the Dutch top 3 clubs (or any Dutch club actually) playing with 3/5 at the back for the last 15 years at least (perhaps never, because it's always 4-3-3 we talk about).

It worked out really well for them. Janmaat, De Vrij, Martins Indi and also Kongolo looked really good.

10 or 12 weeks later LvG suddenly uses the same system for Holland, with Janmaat, De Vrij, Indi (and also Vlaar who worked under Koeman) performing really well. Obviously Louis would never really give the credit to Koeman, but it's quite obvious he deserves it.

Perhaps he'll play 3 at the back at Southampton too, and one of the most ancient systems in the world of football is suddenly used by two prolific Dutch managers, while Dutch managers almost never use another system than 4-3-3. World on its head.
 
^ This...

No formation is perfect but this probably suits van Gaal and our personal best right now. In fact sign Vidal and we could start this...

------------de Gea---------------
-----Jones--Carrick--Evans--
Rafeal--Herrera--Vidal---Shaw
-------------Mata----------------
--------RVP------Rooney------

Tell me that wouldn't be sey :drool:!

It would be, and it's essentially the same as the 442 diamond that we played a few times under SAF in his final season, with Carrick as holding DM/third CB, and two very advanced fullbacks/wingbacks.

The big concern is the pace in the front three but Rooney isn't the slouch he's being painted as by some on here, and with CMs who have pace and energy plus options like Welbeck and Januzaj from the bench, then I think/hope it could work.
 
I've got a question, isn't the 3-5-2 being used so that we can accomodate Rooney, Mata and RvP in the same line up? Why can't we play the Milan style line up when they had Kaka behind two strikers? This one has 4 at the back

Basically this:
Milan_vs_Liverpool_2005-05-25.svg
 
I've got a question, isn't the 3-5-2 being used so that we can accomodate Rooney, Mata and RvP in the same line up? Why can't we play the Milan style line up when they had Kaka behind two strikers?
Did you just pick the Milan side which pissed away the 2005 CL final as your model? :eek:
 
If Guardiola continues his experiments towards the end of last season we might actually not be the only top team that is converting to a 3-4-3.

@Balu what formation have you guys played so far in pre-season. Haven't had much time to follow anything happening in Germany apart from the transfers.
 
Nope. It doesn't require pace up front. It's all about timing and having a shit load of triangles around the box with a goal threat from 4 players. Correct movement is far more important than the speed of movement.
Took the words out of my mouth.
Rooney and Robin aren't the fastest but they won't need to be. Timing is everything.
 
I've got a question, isn't the 3-5-2 being used so that we can accomodate Rooney, Mata and RvP in the same line up? Why can't we play the Milan style line up when they had Kaka behind two strikers? This one has 4 at the back

Basically this:
Milan_vs_Liverpool_2005-05-25.svg

I think if Vidal would come here this might be a real option but without him I feel we are lacking the quality in midfield to play this. On top of that Carrick for all his quality is unfortunately no Pirlo.
 
Why do we "HAVE" to fit Mata, Rooney and RVP in the same lineup? We should pick a system that works for us and stop trying to shove all the big players into the one team. That's how England go wrong.

I see no reason why the 2 (Rooney and RVP) can't interchange with each other as the lone striker. You have to be a team player.
 
So this will be us going into next season....

---------------De Gea---------------
----Smalling---Jones---Evans----
Valencia-----------------------Shaw
---------Fletcher----Herrera---------
-----------------Mata-----------------
------------RVP------Rooney------------

Obviously Fletcher could well end up being Fellaini or Cleverley, looks better with Carrick in there but I give it till Ocotber till we go back to 4-4-2
 
If Guardiola continues his experiments towards the end of last season we might actually not be the only top team that is converting to a 3-4-3.

@Balu what formation have you guys played so far in pre-season. Haven't had much time to follow anything happening in Germany apart from the transfers.

Something like in the picture below. I've no idea how to call that though. Alaba was almost a box to box centerback in most games. But it's too early to draw conclusions from it with half the team still on vacation after the World Cup. If we really continue to play some sort of back 3, I expect it to be very different from van Gaal's ideas though. Probably with at least 1 winger instead of a wingback and one of the 3 central defenders will be Alaba.

BtFiI84CEAA32IJ.png
 
I've got a question, isn't the 3-5-2 being used so that we can accomodate Rooney, Mata and RvP in the same line up? Why can't we play the Milan style line up when they had Kaka behind two strikers? This one has 4 at the back

Basically this:
Milan_vs_Liverpool_2005-05-25.svg


We played this under SAF a few times.

257lq3s.jpg

How it looked during the game.

ManUtddiamondvNewcastle_crop_exact.jpg




It worked pretty well, at times, but we leaked too many goals. That said, I think if we were to replace Carrick and Kagawa with a bit more energy and strength, we would have probably been more solid.

Something like:

De Gea
Rafael - Smalling - Evans - Shaw
Schneiderlin
Herrera - Cleverley
Mata
Van Persie - Rooney

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/formations-to-fit-in-rooney-van-persie-and-mata.391030/
 
Last edited:


According to this guy who really follow our youth players, we're also playing 3-5-2 in our U18 setups. If this is the case the long term vision of our club is to play 3-5-2, it's not just something for the first team. Talks a lot on how our youth system is moving forward under van Gaal, very interesting.


Son of a beesting @Mr. MUJAC stealing my Reece James/Denis Irwin comparison.
 
Why do we "HAVE" to fit Mata, Rooney and RVP in the same lineup? We should pick a system that works for us and stop trying to shove all the big players into the one team. That's how England go wrong.

I see no reason why the 2 (Rooney and RVP) can't interchange with each other as the lone striker. You have to be a team player.
A system that works for us by definition would be one that fits our best players in their most effective positions. Rooney and RVP can clearly work as a front two and Mata would thrive behind these two. A back three really seems to suit Jones and Smalling, Smalling doesn't have to be as good on the ball as Jones and Evans are more than capable. Yes we need more cover at the back and additional midfielders but we would need that anyway, this way we don't need to worry about wingers and any lack of pace as this is covered by our full backs who have it in abundance.

I'm really excited to see where this goes, we can dominate the middle of the park without sacrificing a striker.
 
A system that works for us by definition would be one that fits our best players in their most effective positions. Rooney and RVP can clearly work as a front two and Mata would thrive behind these two. A back three really seems to suit Jones and Smalling, Smalling doesn't have to be as good on the ball as Jones and Evans are more than capable. Yes we need more cover at the back and additional midfielders but we would need that anyway, this way we don't need to worry about wingers and any lack of pace as this is covered by our full backs who have it in abundance.

I'm really excited to see where this goes, we can dominate the middle of the park without sacrificing a striker.

Don't think this is that simple.
1) Smalling definitely needs to be good on and off the ball, as Rafael will be up the pitch more often.
2) Jones needs to be mature into that libero role, which is a big ask of him. His is the most crucial role that will determine how successfull this formation is. He should be defensively aware to sweep up and still not hesitant to step out and distribute the ball out of defence.
3) The midfielders need to be really box-to-box effective, as we will have quite rapid wings and should not become one dimensional. Herrera is primed and ready and I think he needs more than Fletcher in that role. Fellaini, should he come good is OK or we would need Vidal etc.
.
4) And the big thing is injuries/rotation. Which would definitely mean a change of formation, esp in defence (Not sure how much our youngsters are ready to step in now).

Despite all that, I'm excited too!
 
I do think Herrera is a nice fit for a diamond. I could see us playing like this next season:

-----RVP-----Rooney---
----------Mata-----------
-----CM----Herrera---
Shaw-----DM-----Rafael
--Evans--Jones/Smalling--
---------De Gea---------

if we can find a box to box type and a holder. Maybe one of Strootman/Vidal/DiMaria for the former and I really have no idea who for the latter.
 
The midfield looks too congested in that Milan formation. There is no width. The 352 gives so much more freedom to the wingbacks; they are not required to defend all the time as there is usually cover at the back, which gives them more freedom to roam forward and stretch the opposition. Like someone said if we manage to sign Vidal then maybe we can try it but at the moment we don't have anyone near the quality of Gattuso in his prime. He ran that midfield.
 
Carrick has great positional sense and ability to read the game but he's not physical enough and his jumping is very poor. Too many times he's left us exposed to headers when he played as CB.

Fair point, however Carrick so far has only been a stop gap DM. I believe with some attention from van Gaal and some real focus on Carrick's part he could excel there.

As you mention his positional sense is superb and he could cycle the ball which he excels at. In addition his advancing years are less an issue here so really just one or two issue s he would really need to work to improve for him to thrive at DM.

I could be wrong but that is my perspective.
 
I do think Herrera is a nice fit for a diamond. I could see us playing like this next season:

-----RVP-----Rooney----
----------Mata-----------
-----Herrera---Vidal-------
Shaw----Jones-----Rafael
--Evans-----Smalling------
---------De Gea-----------

if we can find a box to box type and a holder. Maybe one of Strootman/Vidal/DiMaria for the former and I really have no idea who for the latter.

fixed for you. No need to buy a holder mid, because Jones can do that job perfectly. Plus he knows how to drop deeper and position between the 2 CB's in case we switch to 3 at the back... LvG knows this. Phil Jones gonna be a star under him (for me he is already a beast... but he can only get better and better under LvG orders)

ps. cant believe some people wanted to sign De Jong.