haram
New Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 12,921
Good WC will increase the price as well.
Claims to be a Serbian footy Journo..
Lazio has received an offer of €200m for Milinkovic Savic. (SkyItalia)
If recent history post-SAF has taught us anything, it’s that we should not neglect investing in midfield.I don't understand people not wanting to sign him due to PP similarities.
Our midfield barring PP and Matic is woefully lacking in any quality. We should be after any top tslents in those positions. He's young powerful with an eye for goal.
It's not that hard to understand, though. Signing Milinković-Savić when we have Pogba in the team would be like Liverpool signing Lampard in lieu of Alonso or Mascherano - two players that helped elevate Gerrard to some of his highest levels of performance. It would be an enterprise fundamentally fraught with risk from the beginning - and an almighty gamble for what will almost definitely be the new transfer record for central midfielders. Now, the gamble might pay off - and those that are skeptics of a potential move might be proven wrong in the long run, but we haven't even figured out the best role for Pogba after almost 2 seasons, and adding Milinković-Savić on top of that existing conundrum might create more questions than answers.I don't understand people not wanting to sign him due to PP similarities.
Our midfield barring PP and Matic is woefully lacking in any quality. We should be after any top tslents in those positions. He's young powerful with an eye for goal.
It's not that hard to understand, though. Signing Milinković-Savić when we have Pogba in the team would be like Liverpool signing Lampard in lieu of Alonso or Mascherano - two players that helped elevate Gerrard to some of his highest levels of performance. It would be an enterprise fundamentally fraught with risk from the beginning - and an almighty gamble for what will almost definitely be the new transfer record for central midfielders. Now, the gamble might pay off - and those that are skeptics of a potential move might be proven wrong in the long run, but we haven't even figured out the best role for Pogba after almost 2 seasons, and adding Milinković-Savić on top of that existing conundrum might create more questions than answers.
That £100 million or whatever it takes to sign Milinković-Savić could be better allocated towards more coherent fits - for both - bringing out the best in Pogba, and improving our structure in midfield. And identifying the type of players Pogba should play with in a midfield-3 isn't even that hard - one passer who can organize the team, and one hard-working box-to-box or defensive midfielder - that ensures Pogba doesn't have to drop back to collect the ball over and over again, and gives him the freedom to express himself because the midfield setup is fairly sound from an organisational and defensive standpoint. It's a combination that's proven over time as well: Milan with Pirlo (passing organizer) + Gattuso (hard-working ball winner) + Seedorf (more disciplined and industrious than Pogba - but someone who frequently drifted wider and was a factor in attack for Milan), Redondo (passing organizer) + Karembeu (hard-working and mobile defensive midfielder) + Seedorf again, Alonso (passing organizer) + Mascherano (defensive midfielder) + Gerrard (freedom to attack), Pirlo (passing organizer) + Vidal (hard working box-to-box who also scored with aplomb as a bonus) + Pogba (drifted wider and had some freedom to attack), etc.
If Milinković-Savić is paired with Pogba, either or both will have to make some concessions - which might inhibit them from performing at 100% from an offensive sense (that's quite blatantly the forte of both of these players), much like Lampard and Gerrard for England when ideally, only one of them should have started at a time with Scholes (passing organizer) and Hargreaves/Carrick. Simply signing someone without having a proper scheme for the future is what led to situations like Verón-Scholes in the past (Verón had other issues as well, to be fair, and never truly settled in - but he was a less than ideal fit with Scholes all things considered). Likewise for Milinković-Savić when we have Pogba - some players just aren't very good fits with existing players at the club, despite their obvious quality.
The only way I can envision them in the same team and performing at a level that's close to their potential best at this moment in time is with the type of 442 diamond Valverde has used at Barcelona over the season with Milinković-Savić in the Paulinho role and Pogba going wide à la Iniesta (not an exact comparison player-for-player - but Pogba has experience as a wide-ish midfield from his Juventus days):
Of course, Mourinho is not going to train the same high-level passing networks because he prefers more simplicity and verticality - those are some of his core ideologies in midfield and attack, but the basic 442 diamond setup should work with a more direct approach as well. In that sense, it could even be compared to a variant of Atlético with Pogba and Milinković-Savić in roles that are a wee bit similar to Koke and Saúl, except Pogba and Milinković-Savić would be more offensively oriented than the Atlético duo.
Oh no, I'm not a Serie A expert by any means, so all the opinions should be taken with a grain of salt. As regards Barella, from limited viewing — he comes across as a relatively well-rounded and multi-purpose box-to-box player. A wee bit like young De Rossi (or Conte in his playing days for Juventus) in that he's fairly tenacious, seems like a natural ball-winner, and plays with a lot of desire while defending or bursting into the final third. Doesn't have the greatest finesse on the ball though - more of a fair passer than an excellent one, his press-resistance isn't always tested in Serie A, and doesn't score a lot of goals yet despite getting into goods positions given his aggressive box-to-box style, but he definitely has a lot of potential and could develop into a solid midfielder - someone who could excel with Pogba if he's developed properly. That said, his tendency to rush into tackles in Verratti-esque fashion is rather worrisome - might well be a non-issue in the long run, but it could lead to disciplinary issues and wear and tear over time as he picks up cumulative injuries. Dunno about him being a target at this moment in time, either - reckon Fabián Ruiz (Real Betis) would be a better signing for this United team - more developed, has refined positional awareness, and better on the ball while providing good workrate from the heart midfield - albeit not as combative as Barella. Would liken him to a personal favorite in Saúl given the respective styles of play and Ruiz's versatility (centrally or out wide), except Ruiz is a classier passer than Saúl. Could be an astute signing for only €30 million.Great post as usual always insightful and highly informative from what I can gather from your posts is that you are quite an expert on Italian league, so that brings me to my question for you how good is the Barella kid with whom we were linked some time earlier could he take one one of the possible midfield spot if Mourinho decides to go for three man midfield next season. What kind of midfielder is he and is he ready for the step up.
Oh no, I'm not a Serie A expert by any means, so all the opinions should be taken with a grain of salt. As regards Barella, from limited viewing — he comes across as a relatively well-rounded and multi-purpose box-to-box player. A wee bit like young De Rossi (or Conte in his playing days for Juventus) in that he's fairly tenacious, seems like a natural ball-winner, and plays with a lot of desire while defending or bursting into the final third. Doesn't have the greatest finesse on the ball though - more of a fair passer than an excellent one, his press-resistance isn't always tested in Serie A, and doesn't score a lot of goals yet despite getting into goods positions given his aggressive box-to-box style, but he definitely has a lot of potential and could develop into a solid midfielder - someone who could excel with Pogba if he's developed properly. That said, his tendency to rush into tackles in Verratti-esque fashion is rather worrisome - might well be a non-issue in the long run, but it could lead to disciplinary issues and wear and tear over time as he picks up cumulative injuries. Dunno about him being a target at this moment in time, either - reckon Fabián Ruiz (Real Betis) would be a better signing for this United team - more developed, has refined positional awareness, and better on the ball while providing good workrate from the heart midfield - albeit not as combative as Barella. Would liken him to a personal favorite in Saúl given the respective styles of play and Ruiz's versatility (centrally or out wide), except Ruiz is a classier passer than Saúl. Could be an astute signing for only €30 million.
City also play a different way. The have a press and a higher line. Also, Fernandinho isn't that indisciplined in his current position.
They dont know shitI don't understand people not wanting to sign him due to PP similarities.
Our midfield barring PP and Matic is woefully lacking in any quality. We should be after any top tslents in those positions. He's young powerful with an eye for goal.
Still not nothing about this lad as I haven't watched Lazio this season.
Is he really that good or is the hype train misleading people? There is a player every season who is very good but the more he's mentioned the better the hype seems to make them, even with half the time people who mention them in conversation haven't seen much of them.
Also, surely he's not as good as Pogba as some have mentioned.
Not on Pogba's level in terms of top potential but he seems to have less flair and more grit. He's a player that I imagine Mourinho will love. Almost a Matic/Pogba hybrid in a sense. He could really compliment them in a 4-3-3. Pogba RCM, MSM RCM, Matic CDM.Still know nothing about this lad as I haven't watched Lazio this season.
Is he really that good or is the hype train misleading people? There is a player every season who is very good but the more he's mentioned the better the hype seems to make them, even with half the time people who mention them in conversation haven't seen much of them.
Also, surely he's not as good as Pogba as some have mentioned.
Are you serious? I would trade Pogba for any of those 3 at the same age without a single doubt. You just mentioned 3 of the greatest players in our history, Pogba has done nothing compared to any of those 3.We just HAVE to build around Pogba. If we had Roy Keane I’d sell him as he may frighten PP. Beckham would need to go as PP may be jealous of superior crossing, Giggs too good at running at people.... As for Cantona? The two wouldn’t work back hard enough....
Why are people so concerned with PP here? If Mourinho is as good as I think he is, surely he’d be able to sort it. Scholes wasn’t the best defensively but was the best CM I’ve ever seen. The issue with Pogba (my favourite current player) is that he either has no discipline or has been given freedom to do as he likes, and judging by recent events I’d say it’s a discipline issue. Shame he messes about bloody dancing rather than focusing on his talent, as on his day he’s brilliant.
It's not that hard to understand, though. Signing Milinković-Savić when we have Pogba in the team would be like Liverpool signing Lampard in lieu of Alonso or Mascherano - two players that helped elevate Gerrard to some of his highest levels of performance. It would be an enterprise fundamentally fraught with risk from the beginning - and an almighty gamble for what will almost definitely be the new transfer record for central midfielders. Now, the gamble might pay off - and those that are skeptics of a potential move might be proven wrong in the long run, but we haven't even figured out the best role for Pogba after almost 2 seasons, and adding Milinković-Savić on top of that existing conundrum might create more questions than answers.
That £100 million or whatever it takes to sign Milinković-Savić could be better allocated towards more coherent fits - for both - bringing out the best in Pogba, and improving our structure in midfield. And identifying the type of players Pogba should play with in a midfield-3 isn't even that hard - one passer who can organize the team, and one hard-working box-to-box or defensive midfielder - that ensures Pogba doesn't have to drop back to collect the ball over and over again, and gives him the freedom to express himself because the midfield setup is fairly sound from an organisational and defensive standpoint. It's a combination that's proven over time as well: Milan with Pirlo (passing organizer) + Gattuso (hard-working ball winner) + Seedorf (more disciplined and industrious than Pogba - but someone who frequently drifted wider and was a factor in attack for Milan), Redondo (passing organizer) + Karembeu (hard-working and mobile defensive midfielder) + Seedorf again, Alonso (passing organizer) + Mascherano (defensive midfielder) + Gerrard (freedom to attack), Pirlo (passing organizer) + Vidal (hard working box-to-box who also scored with aplomb as a bonus) + Pogba (drifted wider and had some freedom to attack), etc.
If Milinković-Savić is paired with Pogba, either or both will have to make some concessions - which might inhibit them from performing at 100% from an offensive sense (that's quite blatantly the forte of both of these players), much like Lampard and Gerrard for England when ideally, only one of them should have started at a time with Scholes (passing organizer) and Hargreaves/Carrick. Simply signing someone without having a proper scheme for the future is what led to situations like Verón-Scholes in the past (Verón had other issues as well, to be fair, and never truly settled in - but he was a less than ideal fit with Scholes all things considered). Likewise for Milinković-Savić when we have Pogba - some players just aren't very good fits with existing players at the club, despite their obvious quality.
The only way I can envision them in the same team and performing at a level that's close to their potential best at this moment in time is with the type of 442 diamond Valverde has used at Barcelona over the season with Milinković-Savić in the Paulinho role and Pogba going wide à la Iniesta (not an exact comparison player-for-player - but Pogba has experience as a wide-ish midfield from his Juventus days):
Of course, Mourinho is not going to train the same high-level passing networks because he prefers more simplicity and verticality - those are some of his core ideologies in midfield and attack, but the basic 442 diamond setup should work with a more direct approach as well. In that sense, it could even be compared to a variant of Atlético with Pogba and Milinković-Savić in roles that are a wee bit similar to Koke and Saúl, except Pogba and Milinković-Savić would be more offensively oriented than the Atlético duo.
Are you serious? I would trade Pogba for any of those 3 at the same age without a single doubt. You just mentioned 3 of the greatest players in our history, Pogba has done nothing compared to any of those 3.
Did you seriously not sense the sarcasm in his post?Are you serious? I would trade Pogba for any of those 3 at the same age without a single doubt. You just mentioned 3 of the greatest players in our history, Pogba has done nothing compared to any of those 3.
He's obviously not no
Well not really, he mentioned how Pogba is his favorite player, but then went on a rant about the dancing so I'm not sure it was sarcasm, he goes on the extremes this guy.Did you seriously not sense the sarcasm in his post?
It's not that hard to understand, though. Signing Milinković-Savić when we have Pogba in the team would be like Liverpool signing Lampard in lieu of Alonso or Mascherano - two players that helped elevate Gerrard to some of his highest levels of performance.
That setup just doesn't seem right to me, mate. Could very well work like a charm under a manager who's an expert midfield organizer in a high-possession setup, but the odds will be stacked against them under current management because Mourinho prefers to play football in a different way that has worked very well for him over the years, and I reckon the structure will get over-run against good high-pressing teams. If we are to sign Jorginho, the third midfielder should ideally be in the mold of Davids/Gattuso/Kanté as opposed to Milinković-Savić because a high-intensity terrier will help us in the press and counter-press and dislodge balls for Jorginho and Pogba (who are good enough as a tandem in terms of controlling games or providing a punch from midfield) - aside from doing a staggering amount of running work in transitions and the defensive phase.Why can't we sign 2 MF's, for example Jorginho, to sit behind Pogba and SMS, to dictate the game?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thefootballtacticsblog/2011/05/how_manchester_united_can_beat.htmlDarren Fletcher missed the 2009 final, and his suspension was viewed as a contributing factor to Barca's midfield dominance.
We should just sign the time bandits for rotation.I reckon we need an agile midget over another midfield giant. Someone who holds onto a ball easy with great technical ability. Another Scholes if you will.
Thiago(Bayern), Iniesta(Barca), Silva(City), Modric(Real), Verratti(PSG), Pjanic(Juv).. all top teams have one
Does anyone think maybe the problem is Matic?
I’ve nothing against him but I wonder if the plan is to sign two first pick midfielders and have Matic as rotation/tactical option.
I know we spent £40m on him in the summer but is that so much, these days, for someone who’d still likely play a lot.
It’s then about which two new signings would compliment each other, and Pogba.
I really take issue with this idea that we have to have one passer, one presser, one DM etc. To of the very best teams in recent years, Barca and the current City, utilise their best passers, those most comfortable on the ball, in midfield. De Bryune, Silva, Xavi and Iniesta are not players we'd traditionally associate with being central-ish midfielders in this country.
Don't think this is the case for most. The majority would rather a 'controller' (there's probably some fancy Italian term for it) that can dictate play. We already have a dynamic playmaker (mezzala) in the form of Pogba and a destroyer in the form of Matic, so to stop all of the creative responsibility being forced on Pogba, someone else should be there to also playmake and set the tempo from a slightly deeper position as well as support Matic in defence. This would allow Paul to roam more, not having to come too deep to retrieve the ball. From what I've watched of SMS, he's more similar to a mezzala than a controller and so, with both him and Pogba in the team, one would have to go against their natural instinct to attack and drop deeper at times to defend and start off attacks rather than provide the killer pass or the late run into the box as they both prefer. I'm not sure how SMS would fair in the deeper role, so I don't know if a system where they alternate between the roles throughout the game would work (I could imagine them getting in each other's way), but I feel it would be an experiment that isn't worth the risk.I really take issue with this idea that we have to have one passer, one presser, one DM etc.