No again you're completely wrong. I actually hate rating sites as they can skew arguments any which way you like. The rating system was to show that he was solid, not rubbish like some said. Averaging a 7 is fine, it's not great but it tells a player was solid. Those sites generally mean feck all though. You're saying he's average even though he was the best RB in the league the previous season? That logic, to me, is bizarre. I'm not saying he's world class or anything of a sort, but he's certainly an above average player who proved that in both the second half of the 12/13 season and throughout the whole of the 13/14 season. So your logic is to call him average because of last season? Ok great argument.
Yes I would still say he was one of their 'better' players all things considered. A lot of the Everton team were truly woeful last season but Coleman was solid throughout. That doesn't imply he was one of their best players, merely one of their better players. That's not saying all too much considering Everton were appalling until they somewhat got their act together. I think a dip in Colemans form near the start of the season really let him down but he ended the season well and had some good games against the top sides.
F365 done a piece on him yesterday, here it is:
http://www.football365.com/f365-says/9898058/F365-Says
Now for someone so average, he certainly done a lot of good plastic season despite being far from his best.
As I've also said a million times, I don't think we will sign him so all the bollox in here the past few days will be for nothing. He's a good player, I like him and if we sign him I will be happy, if we don't, I won't lose any sleep. I also believe he would improve further if he joined us and would offer a great outlet on the right flank. But again, I'm not calling for him to be signed. I just find the whole "he's average / poor" debate quite tedious as he's clearly proved he's above average and a good solid PL player that could potentially improve at a better club.