Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,418
I think it's the nationalist angle that's hard for anyone else to go up against, there's no doubting that Scotland is their number one priority, whereas Labour treated it like a seat bank and had their best Scots come down to focus on Westminster.The thing is that the SNP aren't even that left-wing. For the most part they're perceived as broadly centrist, but with a bit of a heart and a conscience...not quite seen in the sort of soulless vein New Labour often came to be perceived in.
I think it's often a lot more down to perception. The SNP have been putting across a consistent, understandable message for years, and it's managed to resonate. Labour haven't. The thing about their decline is that 2015 was sort of the final drop-off; they'd slowly been losing votes ever since their first election to the Scottish Parliament in 1999 (albeit very little at first), which eventually saw the SNP take power, saw Labour collapse in Holyrood in 2011, and then at UK level in 2015.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, it would be fascinating to see how the party system would shake out once the SNP could no longer rely on that feeling in the event of independence, and the need to have a connection to parties south of the border ceased. Again, hopefully it won't come to that, but the political nerd in me is intrigued. Davidson would be FM before long, you'd think.