- Joined
- Aug 1, 2023
- Messages
- 178
Yes too true you’re dead right about that.I agree, but alas, that has been a tactic used by Ten Hag in multiple games this season whether we like it or not.
Yes too true you’re dead right about that.I agree, but alas, that has been a tactic used by Ten Hag in multiple games this season whether we like it or not.
Very threatening in and around the box, just put him up top .
Completely different skillset to play as a striker vs an unmarked midfielder making late runs into the box.
I agree but I can't think of a more suitable alternative. He will at least bring presence in the box which is a big advantage over anyone else.Completely different skillset to play as a striker vs an unmarked midfielder making late runs into the box.
He has some value outside the box in his duel play, and he is decent running with the ball. If only he could pass is too.McTominay has no value outside of the penalty area. His feet are nowhere near good enough for a Man Utd midfielder, either is his use of the ball.
It's actually laughable for Ten Hag to talk about building from the back when he's picking McTominay in his midfield.
McTominay cannot afford to miss the chances he missed tonight. Cos it just highlights how, when he doesn't bury the opportunities we give him, he brings nothing to the team.
Agreed. False nine could work for him, and maybe even help us pack out the middle v city.Completely different skillset to play as a striker vs an unmarked midfielder making late runs into the box.
Agreed. Case and Mainoo to stay deep, Bruno and McT to push up along with Rashford and Garnacho on the break.Agreed. False nine could work for him, and maybe even help us pack out the middle v city.
Should have scored. Was terrible in a deeper role as usual.
It's so obvious he's a forward. He makes smart runs and knows where to be.
Give him the ball in the midfield and he looks like a Championship player.
Yeah, that's how I see McTominay. Not a DM, or a playmaking #10, or a #9. He pretty much works if he's allowed to play as almost a 'spare player' in midfield, able to ghost into the box and find himself in space and then he's a good finisher for a midfielder. So a system player really, who works well if utilised correctly and the other midfielders offer what he doesn't - ball winning, playmaking, etc.There's a reason he's played his best football for Scotland in a 3-4-2-1 as one of the 2 attacking midfielders.
That might genuinely be the only formation for him to excel in because it means he's not charged with playing deep and there are other creators (the other #10, the wingbacks, a passing mid in the 2 behind him) so he doesn't have to play as a typical #10 and be the primary creator.
Basically Tim Cahill. Hopefully Dyche wants him.
Yeah, that's how I see McTominay. Not a DM, or a playmaking #10, or a #9. He pretty much works if he's allowed to play as almost a 'spare player' in midfield, able to ghost into the box and find himself in space and then he's a good finisher for a midfielder. So a system player really, who works well if utilised correctly and the other midfielders offer what he doesn't - ball winning, playmaking, etc.
Wasn't that similar to the role van de Beek played in that Ajax system that all gelled so well? And just one of the reasons why he struggled when taken out of it and trying to fit into our midfield system.
He was just lost out there. Ten Hag doesn't really know what to do with him apart from "get on the end of things". But there's nothing to get on the end of in a game like that.
I mean that's the only skill McTominay has, which is why he should exclusively be a pseudo Fellaini super sub. Was stupid to play him today, he isn't even very good at winning duels so it's not like we needed him defensively.
If you start him surely it's in a false nine position right? At the very least he won't get involved too much near our own goal but might cause some issues for opposition with late runs into the box. And you can still have a better midfield behind him
I'd agree with you bt it would still be the position with the most positive in using him. Him as dm doesn't work. Him behind the striker doesn't work in a midfield three doesn't work. The only other position is maybe in a back three? But then you take away his late runs into the box when we are already missing our strikerTo be fair the options were limited, the main alternative was Rashford striker and Antony on the wing, which is hardly much better.
He doesn't have the subtlety for a false 9 role, poor enough technique. There would be a big emphasis on the "false" part if he played there.
Lineup was a good guess, wasn't itAgreed. Case and Mainoo to stay deep, Bruno and McT to push up along with Rashford and Garnacho on the break.
Onana
Lindelof Varane Evans Dalot
Casemiro Mainoo
Bruno
McT
Garnacho ________ Rashford
To be fair the options were limited, the main alternative was Rashford striker and Antony on the wing, which is hardly much better.