SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Nothing changed in Wales , the message is still in Lockdown , stay at home . Police told to fine and turn tourists away . We are basically being told to carry on exercising on the beach(going fishing) and we will see how things pan out in England as restrictions are eased there.
 
Very much a make up your own mind what is acceptable behaviour kind of speech. Employers will want their employees back. People allowed to sit in parks now. This is just a recipe for disaster and another spike in 4 weeks time. They shouldn’t even think about these measures for another month at least. We had nearly 400 deaths just yesterday. The government have been an absolute shambles on this for weeks.
 
So what, are they going to end the furlough scheme?

I assume so. I expect most self employed people will have to start working again now. The scheme for claims against loss of earnings hasn't even properly started yet, but I doubt they will cover any further losses after today, given this announcement.

This isn't leadership, it's passing the buck.

I want to emigrate.
 
Nothing changed in Wales , the message is still in Lockdown , stay at home . Police told to fine and turn tourists away . We are basically being told to carry on exercising on the beach(going fishing) and we will see how things pan out in England as restrictions are eased there.
People here are still ignoring the advice, roads as busy as ever.
 
We shouldn't pretend, we should be smarter and act like responsible adults instead of panicking sheep.

If we were halfway useful creatures we could've delt with this at a local level. Instead we pass the buck and whinge.

Quite agree Mr Cummings.
 
So that's everyone driving to the Lake district and swimming in a lake tomorrow then? Unless you work in a factory and you just randomly turn up for a shift on Monday morning because Boris says so?

What an imbecile!
 
"Practically unlimited" time outside and the ability to travel between regions is quite a big change, surely? Seems like a more bold outdoor policy than most countries.


That's part of retail which won't be re-opening until phase 2 / June 1st. Though I'd imagine part of the reason the public announcement comes before parliament has signed anything into law is to move the discussion forward, set out the broad agenda and end some of the infighting around how significant the changes should be, as some ministers were poles apart. Now they've got a much smaller area to debate within so there'll probably be some special exceptions for retailers.

I didn't see anything about the region travelling bit?
 
Aspects people aren't talking about enough, and I'm sure these will creep up on people:

1) Increase in fines for not abiding distancing - zero detail on this.
2) Fascinated to hear more about this Covid tracking technology, but also the reaching function/storage capacity - at the very least, who made it.
3) Just how the government are planning on ensuring more/safer PPE on the frontline.
4) Zero comment on testing figures and routine failures.

I'm not as critical as some of the government. I think they responded slow, have messed up on care-homes massively (my nan sadly was a victim of this non-policy), and have been regularly embarrassed on testing/PPE.

But, on the other hand, I think the furlough scheme can only be applauded, yes it had it's troubles/people falling through the gap but there's no way to avoid this. Cancelling exams early was good and took considerable immediate pressure off teachers (my partner is one who had GCSE classes) who frankly have enough on their plate as it is, and the permitting of daily exercise has almost certainly kept mental health/overall wellbeing higher than if we'd all been hulled up for the last 6 weeks. Yes, I'm sure there has been transmission because of this, but I think the abstract negatives of not pursuing this were worth the risk.
 
We shouldn't pretend, we should be smarter and act like responsible adults instead of panicking sheep.

If we were halfway useful creatures we could've delt with this at a local level. Instead we pass the buck and whinge.

It seems that asking people to be responsible is asking way too much of many adults.

When theres a global pandemic thats killing hundreds of thousands of people, with more dying each day. I think people are right to feel some level of fear, that hardly amounts to people being like ''panicking sheep''.
 
Me too man. I’m massively left wing on almost anything. But I’d censor the shit out of Media if there was a non slippery slope way of doing it.

Where I used to work, there were a group of staunch Tories.
And they always got their 'information' from their beloved Daily Mail.

Talk about being brainwashed.
What am I saying. None of them had a brain to wash...
 
And why rush some of the youngest school children back. Are they supposed to always stay 2m apart....
This is one of the few measures that makes sense. Childcare will be a massive barrier to people returning to work etc and “the science” suggests they aren’t key transmitters of the virus. I was just surprised they were not getting Year 10 students in at the same time.
 
This is one of the few measures that makes sense. Childcare will be a massive barrier to people returning to work etc and “the science” suggests they aren’t key transmitters of the virus. I was just surprised they were not getting Year 10 students in at the same time.

Also the key worker children who currently go to school don’t social distance as it’s impossible.
 
Also the key worker children who currently go to school don’t social distance as it’s impossible.
That really depends on the school. I know of plenty who have maybe 10 kids max a day so the distancing is easier even with primary. I would expect with a full year group or two in school you’d have to really be stringent especially in corridors and classroom environments
 
I have to say, I am disappointed we are still not able to visit in a meaningful way, people from other households (I know you technically can if you remain 2m apart but does this does not count as a visit for me). I guess it is understandable, but having to wait at least 3 more weeks or more for this is quite depressing.
 
That really depends on the school. I know of plenty who have maybe 10 kids max a day so the distancing is easier even with primary. I would expect with a full year group or two in school you’d have to really be stringent especially in corridors and classroom environments

I speaking to one of the parents where we live and she said that they don’t at school so her kids are confused when they meet other kids. I’m not sure how you would get young kids to social distance at school in times like playtime etc.
 
You don't believe constriction/manufacturing companies halted building/production?
Not many around where I live, no. The only ones that have were not doing very well before all this and used the furlough scheme to get a few weeks cashback on paying employees.

My firm hasn't stopped and everyone I know who works in construction and manufacturing haven't missed a day of work, the government actively didn't want to halt these sectors, the message was clear from the beginning "only go to work if you can't work from home" (or something along them lines I forget :lol:)

Yet we aren't classed as key workers, just key workers to the economy.
 
"Practically unlimited" time outside and the ability to travel between regions is quite a big change, surely? Seems like a more bold outdoor policy than most countries.
If the general public were adhering to prior parameters I would agree but this "new" rule is essentially what the majority of the public were doing all this time anyway.

No one was only going outdoors "once" per day, they had confirmed we could drive for exercise a few weeks ago, so I believe this new adjustment is not as material. Sure, if police were out sending people home, arresting people like a proper lockdown then sure, but they haven't been doing it near enough. Rightly or wrongly we've seen Street parties, too many people in parks and public spaces already. So the new rules aren't going to change much.
 
I have to say, I am disappointed we are still not able to visit in a meaningful way, people from other households (I know you technically can if you remain 2m apart but does this does not count as a visit for me). I guess it is understandable, but having to wait at least 3 more weeks or more for this is quite depressing.

Agreed. Personally I can deal with a lockdown for many months, if I can just hug my family members.
 
The term social distancing is one of the most confusing and least understood terms that's emerged during this whole shiteshow. In some countries it is 1 meter, in others it is 2. Some studies recommend 3 meters. Some say the virus can spread through air conditioners, this scientist says it hangs suspended in the air for 30 seconds and that one says for 3 minutes.

Nobody really knows how to practice effective social distancing. Kids don't. They don't even know what a meter is. As for feet, they know they have 2. That old bag standing behind me in the supermarket certainly doesn't understand social distancing. And she represents the majority. God help us all.
 
Not many around where I live, no. The only ones that have were not doing very well before all this and used the furlough scheme to get a few weeks cashback on paying employees.

My firm hasn't stopped and everyone I know who works in construction and manufacturing haven't missed a day of work, the government actively didn't want to halt these sectors, the message was clear from the beginning "only go to work if you can't work from home" (or something along them lines I forget :lol:)

Yet we aren't classed as key workers, just key workers to the economy.
I see, well you're right in that I don't think the government wanted so many workers to completely stop working but where I am it's largely grinded to a halt.

In London it has done too. I remember seeing the pictures of pack trains, where a sizable portion of those workers were in construction and after some pressure from the media and others, that grinded to a halt too.

There will be a real issue with those construction workers in London though, as train capacity has dropped significantly due to fewer trains and social distancing on board too, so I'm not really sure how it can be managed effectively there.
 
On BBC it states a government official has confirmed that we will be able to see 1 person not living in our household as long as we are 2 metres apart from them.
 
Not many around where I live, no. The only ones that have were not doing very well before all this and used the furlough scheme to get a few weeks cashback on paying employees.

My firm hasn't stopped and everyone I know who works in construction and manufacturing haven't missed a day of work, the government actively didn't want to halt these sectors, the message was clear from the beginning "only go to work if you can't work from home" (or something along them lines I forget :lol:)

Yet we aren't classed as key workers, just key workers to the economy.

Most of the major house builders did shutdown but they’ve been back at work for a week or two now. Lots of construction sites did stay open all the way through though. Many tradesmen carried on too, if only part time. Ive noticed lots more have been working round my end in the past few weeks. One roofer has done 3 roofs on my street and the neighbouring one through the lockdown.
 
I didn't see anything about the region travelling bit?

Might be wrong on that one actually. When he said "you can even...drive to other destinations" after saying you can go out for an unlimited period and for no particular reason, I heard that as essentially removing all movement restrictions.

If the general public were adhering to prior parameters I would agree but this "new" rule is essentially what the majority of the public were doing all this time anyway.

No one was only going outdoors "once" per day, they had confirmed we could drive for exercise a few weeks ago, so I believe this new adjustment is not as material. Sure, if police were out sending people home, arresting people like a proper lockdown then sure, but they haven't been doing it near enough. Rightly or wrongly we've seen Street parties, too many people in parks and public spaces already. So the new rules aren't going to change much.

Are you seriously suggesting that most of the UK were not significantly limiting their movement?
 
On BBC it states a government official has confirmed that we will be able to see 1 person not living in our household as long as we are 2 metres apart from them.
Wasn't this always the case if you meet outdoors?

How will they police this in people's houses?