[/QUOTE]
A test that looked for antibodies against the virus would allow you to know who has been exposed and is now immune to it. In some cases it can even dostonguish between active disease and previous exposure.
It shouldn't, from what understand. Hence one of the importances of mass testings in my opinion. It's a test that searches formthe virus' RNA and amplify it, so it should find nothing if the virus has been eliminsted.Does the same test for the virus confirm that somebody who has recovered from it had the virus?
@Arruda
A test that looked for antibodies against the virus would allow you to know who has been exposed and is now immune to it. In some cases it can even dostonguish between active disease and previous exposure.