Fingeredmouse
Full Member
They mirror (no pun intended) their readership.Gotta love how The Sun's major concern is that a number of British holidays to Spain are thrown into doubt
They mirror (no pun intended) their readership.Gotta love how The Sun's major concern is that a number of British holidays to Spain are thrown into doubt
No idea. There have been one or two cases of it returning, but it might have been that they resulted falsely as negative in the first place.Good idea, but if it is like the flu? It will repeat itself in a year and the young ones have to be tested and/or infected and quarantined again to protect the vulnerable. And that year for year, including the economic costs.
And if you don't get it right, it reaches the vulnerable in an outbreak. Sorry, I think we have to ride this one out, while reducing the losses and adjusting our health systems.
Finding the whole 'listening to science' utterly bizarre, sounds like a lot of bollocks. Either that, or the government are actually stupid. Hope it's the former that they're selfish and protecting the economy, I'd rather that than to be living under a stupid government.
I might as well just accept that I will get the virus eventually. Leicestershire has hit 6 cases now.
i mean, it really isn't. but stick to your blind criticism.
I don't pretend to know the long term sustainable measures we should take, but I view as cancelling all social gatherings, working from home, restricting non-essential travel etc as good measures that we can take now to help slow down the spread.
Your partner is clearly an idiot
She's intelligent and academically much more qualified than I'll ever be which makes it more frustrating that she can't see sense here. Her behaviour is extremely selfish more than anything and we've had a few rows over this virus.
Much the same thinking here.No idea. There have been one or two cases of it returning, but it might have been that they resulted falsely as negative in the first place.
I think that this and possibly the next year will be the worst. I believe that within 18 months, scientists would discover efficient anti-virals, if not a vaccine.
I wonder would it be a good strategy to encourage infections on young people (those under 40) who have a low chance of dying but are most active people? If we are going to get it anyway, why not artificially create a scenario when young people get infected first, get quarantined, get healthy and then they won't be able to spread it to other people who are more vulnerable.
I don't think there are ways of doing it, but just as a thought experiment.
I wonder would it be a good strategy to encourage infections on young people (those under 40) who have a low chance of dying but are most active people? If we are going to get it anyway, why not artificially create a scenario when young people get infected first, get quarantined, get healthy and then they won't be able to spread it to other people who are more vulnerable.
I don't think there are ways of doing it, but just as a thought experiment.
Common sense is a meaningless expression.Intelligent people don't always have common sense.
EDIT: I agree with you that it is selfish.
It would seem they're making terrible decisions despite being aware. You have to realise we have a PM in charge who thinks we should just take it on the chin and take it all in one go. So I've absolutely no confidence in the government or their way of dealing with this pandemic.
Is there a breakdown on casualties/age from Italy?
A third more of Covid-19 positive smokers had a more serious clinical situation than non-smokers upon admission, and for them the risk of needing intensive care and mechanical ventilation is more than double. These studies also speculate that the smoker's condition explains the gender difference in the reported lethality rate which would be 4.7% in men versus 2.8% in women.
France closing schools and encouraging companies to telework. That’ll be a full lockdown by next week I’m guessing.
I thought similar. A Chicken Pox party of sorts.
Yeh Leicester in fact, luckily not the worse case of outbreak here.You from Leicestershire?
Some figures from Italy concerning how this progresses and who is most at risk (correct at March 5).
Average of death is 81 (women 83.4, men 79.9)
Average age of patient is 61
Age of death:
90+ - 14.1%
80-89 - 42.2%
70-79 - 32.4%
60-69 - 8.4%
50-59 - 2.8%
Average number of medical conditions at death is 3.4, but broken down:
0-1 - 15.5%
2 - 18.3%
3+ - 67.2%
Hypertension - 74.6%
Heart disease - 70.4%
Diabetes - 33.8%
The median time from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization was 5 days and the median time between hospitalization and death was 4 days.
Yeh Leicester in fact, luckily not the worse case of outbreak here.
Several people have been confirmed to get it second time, so sounds like - no good news there.Is it 100% confirmed that you can't get it again after already having it for a certain period of time? Or do they still not know?
Why are we pretty much the only country in Europe that's taking this genius approach then?
Truth. The only "weapon" we have is social isolation and acting quickly to slow things down and prevent the kind of overwhelming of hospitals that Italy is suffering from. On both these fronts (closing things and doing it quickly) UK, US etc. seem to be failing in a major way. To make things worse, neither of these countries seem to be ready for doing enough tests so the numbers may be totally underreported.Our Government our fecking this up and people will pay with their lives. Incompetent cnuts.
I wonder would it be a good strategy to encourage infections on young people (those under 40) who have a low chance of dying but are most active people? If we are going to get it anyway, why not artificially create a scenario when young people get infected first, get quarantined, get healthy and then they won't be able to spread it to other people who are more vulnerable.
I don't think there are ways of doing it, but just as a thought experiment.
Several people have been confirmed to get it second time, so sounds like - no good news there.
Several people have been confirmed to get it second time, so sounds like - no good news there.
The big worry is that young people might have a low mortality rate but have a similar chance of ending up in ITU as the older people who end up dead.
They might much less likely to die than old/frail people providing they have access to an ITU bed in the 5-10 % of cases who need it. Hence if huge numbers of young people get infected at once, the health service still gets overwhelmed.
I have no idea if this is the case or not. I can’t find any data, other than the anecdotal stuff from Italy about 10% of all cases - young and old - ending up in ITU.
If "genius approach" means delaying measures until the point where you will get most effect from them then you're not the only country doing so.
If you're asking why the UK seems to think that ideal moment is later than other countries do then that's a more interesting question.
It might simply be that the situation isn't quite as advanced in the UK as other countries. For example in terms of cases per million the UK today was in a slightly better position than Ireland was in the day before, with the subsequent worsening of that position being what prompted further measures from Ireland.
Or it might be that while the UK is following similar basic principles as other countries, the actual data modelling they're using is different enough to suggest a different approach in terms of measures. In which case ye may have a problem. Or, I suppose, be proven right.
I think some of you are just trolling now.
If you want to reduce the number of deaths COVID-19 causes long term, you need to build up resistance in the population. Without a vaccine, the only way to do this in a pandemic is to manage the rate of transmission in such way to allow a steady number of people to acquire the virus and develop antibodies against it, which overtime reduces the virus’ R rate. Chris Witty and Sir Patrick Vallance were transparent and honest about this. Perversely, the more people that get the virus and develop resistance to it, the safer the rest of the population is as it is harder for the virus to spread and produce an unmanageable spike in cases. This is the principle behind vaccinations.
Could be done in a prolonged case, for example within the next 2-3 months.The big worry is that young people might have a low mortality rate but have a similar chance of ending up in ITU as the older people who end up dead.
They might be much less likely to die than old/frail people providing they have access to an ITU bed in the 5-10 % of cases who need it. Hence if huge numbers of young people get infected at once, the health service still gets overwhelmed.
I have no idea if this is the case or not. I can’t find any data, other than the anecdotal stuff from Italy about 10% of all cases - young and old - ending up in ITU.
One of the government's failings on this is informing people enough on the severity of the situation and because of their lack of prohibitions, people simply aren't taking this seriously or taking notice.
The amount of people I've spoken to who just have no idea what's going on, what the virus is, or how damaging it could be to our community is frankly quite staggering.
Just been out to Tesco, seems things are now so panicked that people have bought out the whole-wheat pasta as well, they've even started buying the free-from stuff!
People are buying the pre-cooked rice bags as well, I said to the missus that would be the sign that people are really starting to panic buy. Not sure the woman in front of me needs 4 packs of grated cheese for the week either...
Just been out to Tesco, seems things are now so panicked that people have bought out the whole-wheat pasta as well, they've even started buying the free-from stuff!
People are buying the pre-cooked rice bags as well, I said to the missus that would be the sign that people are really starting to panic buy. Not sure the woman in front of me needs 4 packs of grated cheese for the week either...
If you are referring to the numbers i have posted, i only post what comes from the Italian health service or the government in their daily updates.