Hammerfell
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2015
- Messages
- 7,778
So, Brexit?30 years of isolation should do it.
So, Brexit?30 years of isolation should do it.
I'm not down for most of the schadenfreude relating to this absolute nightmare. But you can't tell me this isn't funny.
YesSeems you've done it without trying!
1. ECDC provides no source, i.e. cites no studies whatsoever.Being sceptical about a claim isn't quite the same as asserting that a claim is such outright bullshit that you can't believe people even believe it.
I also wasn't making an appeal to authority as I wasn't asserting that they were correct. I was acknowledging that they undoubtedly have more expertise in the area than you do, then asking for evidence for your own assertions that might undermine their arguments.
As for evidence for their claims, see my above posts for the advice of the ECDC that these governments are basing their decisions on. Unless the ECDC are also people you don't trust on science.
Think they literally just got one.Zero cases in Turkey with so many in the countries around them. Are their borders shut or just not reporting any data at all?
Zero cases in Turkey with so many in the countries around them. Are their borders shut or just not reporting any data at all?
Zero cases in Turkey with so many in the countries around them. Are their borders shut or just not reporting any data at all?
What's Norway's deal? Too fancy pants to give an answer?
Seriously though, it’s obviously extremely suspicious. The government is repressive in many ways, but the society is still open enough that I find it hard to imagine they’d be able to successfully conceal dozens or hundreds of these cases for much longer (if indeed that’s what is happening).
Zero cases in Turkey with so many in the countries around them. Are their borders shut or just not reporting any data at all?
Look at us Portuguese clean folks, eh?
Seriously though, it’s obviously extremely suspicious. The government is repressive in many ways, but the society is still open enough that I find it hard to imagine they’d be able to successfully conceal dozens or hundreds of these cases for much longer (if indeed that’s what is happening).
Nation of liars, is what you are.Look at us Portuguese clean folks, eh?
I did the the online questionnaire to see if I should phone 111 and this is the reply I got.
If you haven't been to an infected area or been in contact with some one who is a confirmed case they wont even talk to you.
It's them Theodosian Walls stopping the virus from invading.
I can tell you it isn't funny. At all for that matter.I'm not down for most of the schadenfreude relating to this absolute nightmare. But you can't tell me this isn't funny.
Urgh, get a room.Thank you brother. And thank you for (seemingly) reining in some of your more alarmist posts in the past few days. Your daily update post from the factual source is helpful and I appreciate it.
I’m sure we’ll both think the other is too dramatic or too ostrich like in the coming weeks. But that’s life.
I'd appreciate a river.Urgh, get a room.
Well, separate rooms in case one of you is infected.
Freddo Escobar hath spoken.Urgh, get a room. Well, separate rooms in case one of you is infected.
Oh, I stand corrected.I can tell you it isn't funny. At all for that matter.
1. ECDC provides no source, i.e. cites no studies whatsoever.
2. ECDC is an EU agency. I'd expect them to say whatever your health minister would say.
Besides, their only definitive claim is that it's "costly", which I suspect the is the real reason. What the government presented is an unsupported claim. So you're not asking me for an evidence that supports an assertion I made that undermines an evidence that they have presented; rather, you're asking me to provide an evidence that supports the negation of their claim. That's not how it works, I'm afraid. You keep appealing to their authority again, but I wouldn't trust any government advisor or agency to not be pressured to tweak their views for whatever policy the government is pushing. Many people have quit over the years because they were being asked of that, in fact.
Now, this conversation is dragging. Go and try to find any scientific publication that supports what the government is claiming. I very much doubt it exists.
As someone else suggested I think the social distancing and look after yourself advice has already started working in England. At the match on Sunday, people seemed to be spending longer (and using more soap) watching their hands than I've ever seen before in public toilets.
While the TV play it up as hoarding (and there probably is some of that) most people are probably just heeding the "prepare" advice and trying to make sure they've a week's worth of food in the cupboard.
I suspect that as of now there will be more work absences/working from home requests for a "bit of a cold" than normal. People are cancelling holiday plans or postponing them. A trade show I was going to at the end of March (at the NEC) has been cancelled today. Same with a couple of other techie events.
When we get told to stay home if we've got a cough, or stop visiting granny if a workmate has got a fever, or avoid crowds if you are a granny, or indeed told that a football match is off - more people are mentally prepared. Hopefully peer group pressure on the ones who aren't bothered will be higher, bad employers well be getting exposed on TV.
It all adds up to a more compliant population, rather than a complacent one. At any rate, I reckon that's part of why "don't rush into the dramatic actions" is still the public health advice for the government in the UK.
I can tell you it isn't funny. At all for that matter.
That's not funny. But the fact she's been all over no. 10 is.She lives with her 84 year old mother who has started showing symptoms.
Okay then. Who do you recon this health minister spends her working day with? Senior and junior health officials I bet. Oh and on many occasions hundreds of hospital staff. If you think that's some great big joke then fair enough but I don't. Wash your fecking legs.Oh, I stand corrected.
No, hang on, it's still funny.
That's not funny. But the fact she's been all over no. 10 is.
Okay then. Who do you recon this health minister spends her working day with? Senior and junior health officials I bet. Oh and on many occasions hundreds of hospital staff. If you think that's some great big joke then fair enough but I don't. Wash your fecking legs.
Quick question, unrelated of anything you two/three are talking about, are you actually victim if you simply contract Coronavirus?No it's not, firstly - I don't think any reasonable person really wishes illness upon their political enemies.
But more seriously, all those people in number 10 are going to become 'spreaders' themselves, and plenty of those victims will have no political connection to them at all.
No it's not, firstly - I don't think any reasonable person really wishes illness upon their political enemies.
But more seriously, all those people in number 10 are going to become 'spreaders' themselves, and plenty of those victims will have no political connection to them at all.
I reckon she went to number 10. As we've been told she did.Okay then. Who do you recon this health minister spends her working day with? Senior and junior health officials I bet. Oh and on many occasions hundreds of hospital staff. If you think that's some great big joke then fair enough but I don't. Wash your fecking legs.
Quick question, unrelated of anything you two/three are talking about, are you actually victim if you simply contract Coronavirus?
Glad you're finally getting it.Let's all laugh with @DiseaseOfTheAge , the absolute legend who thinks it's funny that the people who we are depending on to attempt to deal with this virus are getting ill from it. It will be doubly funny when the health officials supposed to be coordinating the response get it too.
Seriously though, it’s obviously extremely suspicious. The government is repressive in many ways, but the society is still open enough that I find it hard to imagine they’d be able to successfully conceal dozens or hundreds of these cases for much longer (if indeed that’s what is happening).
As someone else suggested I think the social distancing and look after yourself advice has already started working in England. At the match on Sunday, people seemed to be spending longer (and using more soap) watching their hands than I've ever seen before in public toilets.
While the TV play it up as hoarding (and there probably is some of that) most people are probably just heeding the "prepare" advice and trying to make sure they've a week's worth of food in the cupboard.
I suspect that as of now there will be more work absences/working from home requests for a "bit of a cold" than normal. People are cancelling holiday plans or postponing them. A trade show I was going to at the end of March (at the NEC) has been cancelled today. Same with a couple of other techie events.
When we get told to stay home if we've got a cough, or stop visiting granny if a workmate has got a fever, or avoid crowds if you are a granny, or indeed told that a football match is off - more people are mentally prepared. Hopefully peer group pressure on the ones who aren't bothered will be higher, bad employers well be getting exposed on TV.
It all adds up to a more compliant population, rather than a complacent one. At any rate, I reckon that's part of why "don't rush into the dramatic actions" is still the public health advice for the government in the UK.