Saido Berahino

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saying this without any BTS knowledge of course, but maybe just maybe Everton are handling the Stones situation more amicable than WBA are handling the Berahino situation, I mean he is obviously mad about something.

I would imagine he's mad about the fact that WBA had already given him permission to talk to Spurs and have a medical - only then for their chairman to issue a statement saying he wasn't for sale. Not to mention the stream of public comments from WBA, most them containing falsehoods.

This is all about Pearce wanting to play the tough guy. Good luck to him, but his games have only left him with a damaged player who will leave later on for far less money than they could have gotten now.
 
Or he could have a great season and leave for more money.
 
I think a big part of the problem is that chairman base their prices on the fees paid by the mega rich clubs. Just because City by Sterling for £50 million, or we pay £36 million for Martial, it doesn't mean price can be set using those fees as a guideline. It's the market that dictates price and each player has an individual market. The same clubs aren't interested in every player, hence supply and demand is different for each player.

No big clubs were in for Berahino. In fact, it seems they only had one club bidding for him. If he was being that under valued, then surely some other mid level club would jump in. But no Prem clubs, such as West Ham or Newcastle made a move. No foreign clubs came in. Everyone is being critical of Berahino and rightly so, but at the same time, we have to recognize that currently, some chairman are valuing their players based on an odd valuing system. This is why it's so much better for English clubs to buy abroad. Their leagues tend to only have 1 or 2 rich clubs, whilst we have 5, that give chairman a totally false idea of what their players are worth.

Berahino is only worth £25 million if a club is prepared to pay it and unless one of us, City, Chelsea, Arsenal or Liverpool are interested, that isn't going to happen as he's not good enough for interest from those clubs. At the end of the day he's not even a full international. He's never played CL football and he's never scored that many goals. A similar player in Germany or France, would probably cost another club in that league around £10 million. Berahino is Prem proven, but he's not proven to be top class. He's alright and his value should be based on him being "alright," and not on how much the world richest clubs paid for other players.
 
I would imagine he's mad about the fact that WBA had already given him permission to talk to Spurs and have a medical - only then for their chairman to issue a statement saying he wasn't for sale. Not to mention the stream of public comments from WBA, most them containing falsehoods.

This is all about Pearce wanting to play the tough guy. Good luck to him, but his games have only left him with a damaged player who will leave later on for far less money than they could have gotten now.

If the make up of your reported bids are true then Berahino would be wise to direct his anger towards Daniel Levy and the circus act he runs at the end of every August.
 
If he's smart (which evidently he isn't) he'll get his head down, work hard, and have a good season. Then next Summer he can get a move to a big club instead.
 
Anything is possible, but his tweet doesn't bode well for such an outcome.

It's nothing compared to the fit Suarez was throwing at the time. Schneiderlin was a bit of a muppet, too.

It can go either way.
 
If the make up of your reported bids are true then Berahino would be wise to direct his anger towards Daniel Levy and the circus act he runs at the end of every August.

The key word in your sentence is 'IF'. The reports from WBA lack credibility. For example, it's not credible to claim that Spurs only offered to pay £5m up front out of a £20m+ fee. And in any case, Spurs have themselves said it isn't true according to the BBC.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Peace

XXrB4Rv.png
 
The key word in your sentence is 'IF'. The reports from WBA lack credibility. For example, it's not credible to claim that Spurs only offered to pay £5m up front out of a £20m+ fee. And in any case, Spurs have themselves said it isn't true according to the BBC.

You're in no real position to assess the credibility of the reports.

What's clear is that West Brom have a player that wanted to leave, and they would have sold given the right offer. Spurs haven't done that.
 
Seems like a total shit bag.

He just needed a good run until the January window and Spurs among others could be in for him again

If he refuses to play, he will probably be fined week after week
 
Last edited:
The key word in your sentence is 'IF'. The reports from WBA lack credibility. For example, it's not credible to claim that Spurs only offered to pay £5m up front out of a £20m+ fee. And in any case, Spurs have themselves said it isn't true according to the BBC.
And yet you somehow think it's credible you only paid £13m for Soldado? :lol:
 
And yet you somehow think it's credible you only paid £13m for Soldado? :lol:

That's not what I've said. I've said the fee was £26m including potential add-ons, with £13m up front - i.e. 50% up front. In contrast, WBA have tried to claim that Spurs offered less than 25% up front for Berahino, which is simply not credible and has been denied by Spurs according to the BBC.
 
And that Madrid couldn't open the De Gea paperwork because we password protected it :lol::lol:

Oh dear. These attempts to fabricate things I've not said are just pathetic ... and very boring.
 
That's not what I've said. I've said the fee was £26m including potential add-ons, with £13m up front - i.e. 50% up front. In contrast, WBA have tried to claim that Spurs offered less than 25% up front for Berahino, which is simply not credible and has been denied by Spurs according to the BBC.
This was in mid-August...
...we've so far only paid £13m for Soldado, since the other £13m was for potential add-ons that won't materialise if we sell him. Thus, if Soldado is sold, the loss will be marginal.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Peace

XXrB4Rv.png

It gets better

Pissing on Saido Berahino's dreams[edit]
In 2015, he had a confrontation with Berahino over a move to Tottenham. Peace chained up Saido Berahino in his basement, not allowing him any contact with Tottenham Hotspur. However, Peace did allow him one tweet. Berahino was hoping to become the next Doctor Who prior to this predicament. [8]
 
If he's smart (which evidently he isn't) he'll get his head down, work hard, and have a good season. Then next Summer he can get a move to a big club instead.
Weren't there rumours of him the season before last having a massive attitude problem? I don't think there's much chance of that which is sad for his manager, teammates and fans.
 
So he stays put after all. With Spurs looking short up front, and West Brom signing Rondon, was fully expecting this one to go through. Sounds like a case of two chairmen with larger egos than they have sense.
 
Oh dear. These attempts to fabricate things I've not said are just pathetic ... and very boring.

.....

When the entire British and Spanish press, including their own mouth piece, seems to lay the blame at their feet,

This is not actually true. For example, Marca in Spain have claimed that the documents which United sent over to Real were protected by a password, meaning that Madrid bosses could not complete their half of the deal.
.

Yep. 'Fabricated'.
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Oh ffs, I have no idea who this Glaston lad is but he's comedy gold. Password protecting the DDG documents. I've literally heard it all now. Keep it up lad.
 
You're in no real position to assess the credibility of the reports.

What's clear is that West Brom have a player that wanted to leave, and they would have sold given the right offer. Spurs haven't done that.

I doubt there's been a football deal anywhere, ever, that involved the buying club offering less than 25% of the fee up front. As I've said, the claim lacks any credibility except to the credulous.

When I've previously said, backed by the report of a respected journo (not to mention other sources), that Spurs only paid 50% of Soldado's fee up-front, this was widely disputed on here despite their being no evidence to the contrary. Yet now you're keen believe a figure of less than 25% for Berahino. Go figure.
 
Quite amazing some of the reactions to the tweet. It's silly no doubt but like many have said, nothing new. I'll leave this here.

 
Quite amazing some of the reactions to the tweet. It's silly no doubt but like many have said, nothing new. I'll leave this here.



This has already been mentioned. Thanks, though. Did anyone defend that tweet at the time? Berahino has a history of being a bit of a twat. Where exactly will this tweet get him?
 
Can't understand why you'd do such thing, I mean really, has he got no friends or family he can vent his frustration to? He'll get torrent of abuse now from the fans most likely and nobody will benefit from it, including him, as I expect his form to drop.
 
Can you read? I said that Marca made the claim. I didn't ... contrary to your fabricated post.

I said you found it 'credible' (in reply to the original post by @Señor ) which you obviously did, otherwise why post it? Unless, of course, you knew it was BS but wanted to post it anyway just as a WUM? Now there's a shock!
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Oh ffs, I have no idea who this Glaston lad is but he's comedy gold. Password protecting the DDG documents. I've literally heard it all now. Keep it up lad.

I've no idea who this Robbie Boy is, but one day he might hear about Marca and what they've claimed. Keep it up ... your doing so well in the mindless idiocy stakes.
 
I doubt there's been a football deal anywhere, ever, that involved the buying club offering less than 25% of the fee up front. As I've said, the claim lacks any credibility except to the credulous.

When I've previously said, backed by the report of a respected journo (not to mention other sources), that Spurs only paid 50% of Soldado's fee up-front, this was widely disputed on here despite their being no evidence to the contrary. Yet now you're keen believe a figure of less than 25% for Berahino. Go figure.

I'm not sure whether I believe it or not, but it would fall in line with the reckless manner in which Spurs approach transfer windows and its conclusions.

West Brom are standing by their belief that the offers weren't acceptable. It's very, very clear that West Brom were willing to sell for a price they considered reasonable, having brought in attacking replacements over the course of the summer and allowing Berahino permission to talk to other clubs.

Spurs have failed here and failed horrendously, symptomatic of the Daniel Levy's entire transfer strategy over an extended period of time.
 
I've no idea who this Robbie Boy is, but one day he might hear about Marca and what they've claimed. Keep it up ... your doing so well in the mindless idiocy stakes.

Mate, I have no idea of your history on here but from people's reactions, I can see the general consensus on what you're like. Why are you so invested in the DDG story? It's nothing to do with your club. And you actually believe that 'password protected document' story. Bless.
 
I said you found it 'credible' (in reply to the original post by @Señor ) which you obviously did, otherwise why post it? Unless, of course, you knew it was BS but wanted to post it anyway just as a WUM? Now there's a shock!

Yet more fabrication. I didn't say that it was credible, nor imply that it was. I cited the Marca report as an example, in response to a poster who falsely claimed that the entire Spanish press was blaming RM for the deal collapsing.

Do you and others realise how much the whole standard of discussion gets dragged down and destroyed by the continual inventions and lying about what other posters have said? It's a fecking waste of space.
 
When I've previously said, backed by the report of a respected journo (not to mention other sources), that Spurs only paid 50% of Soldado's fee up-front, this was widely disputed on here despite their being no evidence to the contrary. Yet now you're keen believe a figure of less than 25% for Berahino. Go figure.
I don't believe that you offered £5m up front for Berahino either because that would be stupid as feck. Just like I don't believe you paid only £13m for Soldado. What evidence do we have to provide? :lol: If you really paid £13m, then it would've been reported as £13m rising to £26m and a whole lot of reporters would've mentioned it rather than one Jason Burt a long time after the transfer had already happened! You do seem to pick and choose who you want to believe.

You also assume that if what you say is true, that the other £13m is purely addons and not installments. I find it hard to believe that Valencia are that stupid that they'd only take a guaranteed £13m for their star striker.

And finally who are these respectable sources other than one solitary Jason Burt who was only speculating himself iirc, saying he was 'led to believe' it was that.

But that won't stop you from believing we spent more than we did on our players and made loss after loss on our outgoings.
 
.... I can see ... what you're like. ...

Ditto for you: just another mindless poster who thinks that posting numerous laughing emoticons and fabricating the view of others amounts to worthwhile posts, because they lack the nous or intelligence to do anything else. And meanwhile any reasonable discussion gets destroyed because of posters like you.
 
Ditto for you: just another mindless poster who thinks that posting numerous laughing emoticons and fabricating the view of others amounts to worthwhile posts, because they lack the nous or intelligence to do anything else. And meanwhile any reasonable discussion gets destroyed because of posters like you.

:lol:

You're fab.
 
Ditto for you: just another mindless poster who thinks that posting numerous laughing emoticons and fabricating the view of others amounts to worthwhile posts, because they lack the nous or intelligence to do anything else. And meanwhile any reasonable discussion gets destroyed because of posters like you.
Is the Spurs forums really that dull that you invest so much time here? ..and who uses Ditto nowadays?
 
I don't believe that you offered £5m up front for Berahino either because that would be stupid as feck. ...

They why are you disputing what I've said about WBA's claims lacking credibility?

As for the rest of your post about Soldado, that been done to death elsewhere. Go search if you're that bothered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.