Lebowski
Full Member
This was the hope when Putin to over from Yeltsin after the corrupt, wild west 90s. A lot of western leaders at the time rather naively thought of Putin as a "tough administrator" willing to make the hard decisions to purge domestic corruption and bring Russia closer to democratic and pluralistic European standard. What they didn't realize is that Putin would simply used his power to megalomaniacally formalize the nonsense of the 90s into state sponsored corruption to meet his venal, neo-imperialist interests; which is precisely what one might have predicted when gifting control of a nation to a KGB officer.
Had he been the guy western leaders hoped and expected, he could set in motion a series of technocratic reforms that used Russia's vast energy resources to gradually divest and diversify away from oil and gas, and towards other sources of revenue; much as some of the Gulf states are doing. Instead, we are where we are today because the guy who replaced Yeltsin turned out to be an organized crime figure masquerading as a statesman.
Russia is a completely different country now to what it was in the 1990s.
You can say a lot of things about Putin, but the country is far more modern and the living standard of the average Russian is far higher than it was at it's nadir during the US-imposed economic reordering of the 1990s. He hasn't stopped corruption, and he's obviously incredibly corrupt himself, but he has made oligarchs pay tax and used it to fund domestic programmes.
This is a useful lens to view the current US - Russian relations too. Most of the current Russian administration are haunted by their experiences during the 90s and are motivated to never again be in a position where the US can impose terms, ignore them, or treat them as a joke. Putin's domestic policies have won him a lot of support in the country, and the 'optics' of being seen publicly to face off against the west and not back down is, I think, a lot more important that a lot of western observers realise because of the country's recent history.
...Obviously none of this should be construed as a justification for Russian military aggression.