Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

As you read this, the US is importing 700,000 barrels of Russian oil per day.
Next week, the Biden admin sits down with Russian counterparts to remove sanctions form Iran and give them an absurd Nuke deal.

Let that sink in.

with no deal in place Iran are more likely to build nuclear capabilities I think is the logic.
 
Of course they'd retaliate. They're not going to let just Russia live so that the human race goes on.

The more interesting question is what happens if Putin actually goes for a small non nuclear NATO nation. I'd expect retaliation via troops, air etc but what if Putin sends a nuke or 2 to flatten it and threatens nukes for the entire world if they don't back down?

Will US, UK, France etc say, 'Well, country X isn't worth ending the world for even though they're NATO' and let it be? I'd be surprised if Putin hasn't thought of this and push comes to shove, there's a part of me that thinks he'd be right and the west would back down.
My best guess is that if Russian nukes some NATO country, there is going to be a small retaliation, a bit of tit for tat. Likely not nuking Moscow, but nuking some random Russian base, and putting deterrent forces in the highest alert, using the backchannels to tell Russian generals in no uncertain terms that the next time is going to be a full retaliation.

And then either someone puts Putin down, or we have a nuclear Holocaust.

Not retaliating with nukes if you get nuked makes no sense.
 
Could be a Ukrainian tactic to seed doubts within the Russian security services. If it's real that elements within the FSB helped...then that's interesting to say the least.

 
Of course they'd retaliate. They're not going to let just Russia live so that the human race goes on.

The more interesting question is what happens if Putin actually goes for a small non nuclear NATO nation. I'd expect retaliation via troops, air etc but what if Putin sends a nuke or 2 to flatten it and threatens nukes for the entire world if they don't back down?

Will US, UK, France etc say, 'Well, country X isn't worth ending the world for even though they're NATO' and let it be? I'd be surprised if Putin hasn't thought of this and push comes to shove, there's a part of me that thinks he'd be right and the west would back down.
Then they would retaliate, whatever the outcome. No way Russia would be allowed to vaporize lets say Vilnius without a proportionate response.

I even think that Russian direct intervention on some non-Nato countries would provoke Nato to strike back. While Nato won't go to war for the Ukraine, I'm not so sure about EU members Finland and Sweden.
 
Unfortunately, because of Soviet era and Russian empire times, many Russian people that I know have that feeling of supremacy and arrogance with regards to other nations that were part of USSR. How many Russians bothered to learn Ukranian while having lived there decades? The words from USSR anthem: "союз нерушимый республик свободных сплотила навеки великая русь... (unbreakable union of free republics were united forever by great Russia...)"
This is interesting - can @harms chime in here - is this about how it is?
 
Modern deployed physics packages are thermonuclear fission bombs. They use regular fission cores which are boosted by tritium gas, in a process that I won't describe here. That is very different from a hydrogen (fusion) device which although can reach greater yield is impractical and requires certain conditions which are hard to maintain.

Appreciate your clarification.
 
This is interesting - can @harms chime in here - is this about how it is?
I was born in USSR, am native Russian speaker, but not Russian by nationality. Let me give you an example. US ambassador in my country gives a speech in local language when he congratulates citizens on some national hoilidays. The Russian ambassador gives a similar speech in Russian. An absolute majority of Russian people never learnt languages of the ex-USSR republics, despite having born and lived there for 2-3 generations.
 
My best guess is that if Russian nukes some NATO country, there is going to be a small retaliation, a bit of tit for tat. Likely not nuking Moscow, but nuking some random Russian base, and putting deterrent forces in the highest alert, using the backchannels to tell Russian generals in no uncertain terms that the next time is going to be a full retaliation.

And then either someone puts Putin down, or we have a nuclear Holocaust.

Not retaliating with nukes if you get nuked makes no sense.
I agree but the 'you' here would be say Latvia, not the US, UK etc. What you're saying is more probable btw but I do think there's a possibility of it going the other route and Putin may take the world up on that question if the cnut doesn't die soon.
 
Then they would retaliate, whatever the outcome. No way Russia would be allowed to vaporize lets say Vilnius without a proportionate response.

I even think that Russian direct intervention on some non-Nato countries would provoke Nato to strike back. While Nato won't go to war for the Ukraine, I'm not so sure about EU members Finland and Sweden.
Hope so because it's been pathetic to see what's happened at Ukraine. More importantly, I hope Putin believes this
 
I agree but the 'you' here would be say Latvia, not the US, UK etc. What you're saying is more probable btw but I do think there's a possibility of it going the other route and Putin may take the world up on that question if the cnut doesn't die soon.
Risk worth taking though. Otherwise, next time he sees a bad dream it is going to be London or Washington.
 
China standing with Vlad…


More like China killing off any modicum of protest based on anything before it gets to China.

This is why they're much, much more dangerous than Russia. More money, more people and actual competence in evil studies.
 
Wait im confused, how does pulling PL matches show support for Ukraine?
Two separate issues: the PL no longer wants to broadcast in Russia, and separately China won't broadcast the PL whilst there is a big focus on paying respect to Ukraine before matches.
 
I don't think he's being racist? He's suggesting that the idea of it being used in the continent where he lives is stomach churning, which it is.

Not sure I see the issue in this report to be honest. People can see what they want I guess
What I got from it was him saying that it's not so stomach churning being used in the middle East..... Take from that what you will
 
So Nato saying going to discuss a no fly zone in Ukraine today, but we already know this can't happen unless Nato are prepared to kill Russian troops and destroy Russian planes etc

It's just crazy.

Do we really believe that even if attacked, Putin would seriously launch a Nuclear war?

He will just carrying on evading other nations just by waving his Nuke banner each time.

Nato are prepared to launch nuclear war if they attack a nato country but not if its Ukraine.

Doesn't sound realistic either.
 
My best guess is that if Russian nukes some NATO country, there is going to be a small retaliation, a bit of tit for tat. Likely not nuking Moscow, but nuking some random Russian base, and putting deterrent forces in the highest alert, using the backchannels to tell Russian generals in no uncertain terms that the next time is going to be a full retaliation.

And then either someone puts Putin down, or we have a nuclear Holocaust.

Not retaliating with nukes if you get nuked makes no sense.

I'm not sure that would be wise. I could see a full scale air attack going for every known missile launching site in Russia. Probably the biggest air attack in history. If it required putting special forces in to disable facilities then so be it. The problem would be the Nuclear Subs.

I think the intention would be to try and limit the amount of sites they could launch more Nukes from. Rather than us simply trading one Nuke with another.
 
What I got from it was him saying that it's not so stomach churning being used in the middle East..... Take from that what you will
As i say, people will read into it what they want, from my perspective it was suggesting that the bombs being used on civilians in a European capital is slightly different (and more relatable) then being used on caves in Afghanistan against potential terrorist threats, which really for a western reporter living/working in Europe it is!

Certainly doesn't make it racist, also doesn't mean that using bombs of such destruction is right in any situation, but there you go.
 
I'm speaking to my friend in Moscow and she says it's getting pretty bad there. The price of basic things like milk etc goes up everyday and they're shutting down all independent TV and radio.

She can't access her savings in Euros/dollars and can only use russian currency, which is getting worse and worse.

A lot of the population, especially older folk are completely brainwashed. Half her friends have already fled the country. Some others are trying to pretend like nothing is happening and others are still trying to protest but people are more and more afraid because of jail sentences. People on the streets generally look scared and afraid, avoiding eye contact etc.

Says her friend works high up in government and nobody expected this to happen, it was kept very secret. Apparently only 5 people have close access to Putin and they're all very much under his influence. All the elite are scared of him.
 
Why?

Just means the rest of the world gets to wake up and see how these countries act to murder.
Any sign of them backing Russia is a bit concerning to our civilisation.

Maybe there’s another angle?
 
I was born in USSR, am native Russian speaker, but not Russian by nationality. Let me give you an example. US ambassador in my country gives a speech in local language when he congratulates citizens on some national hoilidays. The Russian ambassador gives a similar speech in Russian. An absolute majority of Russian people never learnt languages of the ex-USSR republics, despite having born and lived there for 2-3 generations.
Wasn't aware of that - thanks. Then no need for Harms to chime in ;)
 
Wasn't aware of that - thanks. Then no need for Harms to chime in ;)
Harms is an absolutely terrific person, that much I am pretty sure of. It takes some courage to go out and protest like he did. Hats off to him.
 
As for China, given what they have done to the Uighurs, why would we expect anything less than their support for Russia?

What the west needs to be doing is investing in self sufficiency. Stop buying China tat, invest in renewables, in short do everything to minimise reliance on anything produced or extracted from either China or Russia. If that means selling fewer fecking phones, then so be it.
 
Harms is an absolutely terrific person, that much I am pretty sure of. It takes some courage to go out and protest like he did. Hats off to him.
I share your opinion based on his posts, absolutely. I was only asking that he verify what you said as a Russian (not knowing your background).
 
I share your opinion based on his posts, absolutely. I was only asking that he verify what you said as a Russian (not knowing your background).
He might be of completely opposite opinion to that of mine though. We all hate Putin, we all want peace and prosperity in our countries.
 
This is interesting - can @harms chime in here - is this about how it is?

They are correct, based on my experience. I am from Moldova and we have a big russian ethnic minority. It's quite widespread that Russian speaking people don't bother to learn Romanian, which is the official language.
 
I'm not sure that would be wise. I could see a full scale air attack going for every known missile launching site in Russia. Probably the biggest air attack in history. If it required putting special forces in to disable facilities then so be it. The problem would be the Nuclear Subs.

I think the intention would be to try and limit the amount of sites they could launch more Nukes from. Rather than us simply trading one Nuke with another.
An attack on nuclear forces is called a first-strike, and because the message is loud and clear ("I'm taking your nukes away"), it is to be prosecuted with nuclear weapons not conventional ones, to maximize the chances of destroying all of the launchers and bases.
 
I'm not sure that would be wise. I could see a full scale air attack going for every known missile launching site in Russia. Probably the biggest air attack in history. If it required putting special forces in to disable facilities then so be it. The problem would be the Nuclear Subs.

I think the intention would be to try and limit the amount of sites they could launch more Nukes from. Rather than us simply trading one Nuke with another.
That guarantees a full retaliation from Russia though. It takes longer to shoot Russian ICBMs (and we don't know where many of them are) deep in Russia, then for Russia to throw them. And as you said, there are the Russian subs, who then would retaliate.

So, if Russia nukes Ukraine, I think there are two options: a) NATO does nothing; b) NATO does massive non-nuke air strikes in Russian troops in Ukraine.

If Russia nukes some NATO country, I guess we have 3 options: a) NATO does nothing; b) NATO does tit for tat to de-escalate the situation; c) NATO fully retaliates which means Russia fully counter-retaliates.

If Russia nukes US, then I think we expect a full immediate retaliation, in fact before the ICBM/SLBM hits the US, the US has thrown hundreds of nukes towards Russia with thousands being prepared.
 
That's my take, too, but if you really think about it, does he really need such a settlement? If he's forced to retreat, he could just spin it like "see? We denazified Ukraine and took out their military. There's no threat to Russians anymore". It would probably weakens his political position against people who know what really happens. But if the sanctioned didn't lead to a coup, this wouldn't either I suppose. Russia has moved past facts, they'll just sell to their public whatever suits their narrative the most.

I think the real question is: How much is the population willing to accept? We see at North Korea that "modern" dictatorships can completely dominate the population but in contrast to North Korea, the Russians actually got a glimps what freedom and luxury (relatively speaking) tastes like.

A dictator lives and dies based on his (projected) strength. Brainwashing his own population is one thing, but if he were to leave Ukraine empty handed after more or less humiliating his military, losing thousands of soldiers and wrecking his own economy, then I assume the people around him would get their daggers out.
The same goes for his foreign policy: I assume Nato could relatively easily stop his forces in Ukraine, but it's this image of a strong and unscrupulous leader that makes them too afraid to get actively involved.
And even this idea that he has absolutely nothing to fear about on the domestic front might be a bit naive. It sure doesn't feel like it, but we're just a couple of days into the war and the sanctions, war enthusiasm and emotions are probably at their peak. But that doesn't mean it will always be like that, once the economy deteriorates further and the coffins come home, going on and on about Nato and Nazis in Ukraine might not be so effective anymore.
 
Last edited: