VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,104
As you read this, the US is importing 700,000 barrels of Russian oil per day.
Next week, the Biden admin sits down with Russian counterparts to remove sanctions form Iran and give them an absurd Nuke deal.
Let that sink in.
My best guess is that if Russian nukes some NATO country, there is going to be a small retaliation, a bit of tit for tat. Likely not nuking Moscow, but nuking some random Russian base, and putting deterrent forces in the highest alert, using the backchannels to tell Russian generals in no uncertain terms that the next time is going to be a full retaliation.Of course they'd retaliate. They're not going to let just Russia live so that the human race goes on.
The more interesting question is what happens if Putin actually goes for a small non nuclear NATO nation. I'd expect retaliation via troops, air etc but what if Putin sends a nuke or 2 to flatten it and threatens nukes for the entire world if they don't back down?
Will US, UK, France etc say, 'Well, country X isn't worth ending the world for even though they're NATO' and let it be? I'd be surprised if Putin hasn't thought of this and push comes to shove, there's a part of me that thinks he'd be right and the west would back down.
Could be a Ukrainian tactic to seed doubts within the Russian security services. If it's real that elements within the FSB helped...then that's interesting to say the least.
Then they would retaliate, whatever the outcome. No way Russia would be allowed to vaporize lets say Vilnius without a proportionate response.Of course they'd retaliate. They're not going to let just Russia live so that the human race goes on.
The more interesting question is what happens if Putin actually goes for a small non nuclear NATO nation. I'd expect retaliation via troops, air etc but what if Putin sends a nuke or 2 to flatten it and threatens nukes for the entire world if they don't back down?
Will US, UK, France etc say, 'Well, country X isn't worth ending the world for even though they're NATO' and let it be? I'd be surprised if Putin hasn't thought of this and push comes to shove, there's a part of me that thinks he'd be right and the west would back down.
This is interesting - can @harms chime in here - is this about how it is?Unfortunately, because of Soviet era and Russian empire times, many Russian people that I know have that feeling of supremacy and arrogance with regards to other nations that were part of USSR. How many Russians bothered to learn Ukranian while having lived there decades? The words from USSR anthem: "союз нерушимый республик свободных сплотила навеки великая русь... (unbreakable union of free republics were united forever by great Russia...)"
Modern deployed physics packages are thermonuclear fission bombs. They use regular fission cores which are boosted by tritium gas, in a process that I won't describe here. That is very different from a hydrogen (fusion) device which although can reach greater yield is impractical and requires certain conditions which are hard to maintain.
I was born in USSR, am native Russian speaker, but not Russian by nationality. Let me give you an example. US ambassador in my country gives a speech in local language when he congratulates citizens on some national hoilidays. The Russian ambassador gives a similar speech in Russian. An absolute majority of Russian people never learnt languages of the ex-USSR republics, despite having born and lived there for 2-3 generations.This is interesting - can @harms chime in here - is this about how it is?
I agree but the 'you' here would be say Latvia, not the US, UK etc. What you're saying is more probable btw but I do think there's a possibility of it going the other route and Putin may take the world up on that question if the cnut doesn't die soon.My best guess is that if Russian nukes some NATO country, there is going to be a small retaliation, a bit of tit for tat. Likely not nuking Moscow, but nuking some random Russian base, and putting deterrent forces in the highest alert, using the backchannels to tell Russian generals in no uncertain terms that the next time is going to be a full retaliation.
And then either someone puts Putin down, or we have a nuclear Holocaust.
Not retaliating with nukes if you get nuked makes no sense.
China standing with Vlad…
Hope so because it's been pathetic to see what's happened at Ukraine. More importantly, I hope Putin believes thisThen they would retaliate, whatever the outcome. No way Russia would be allowed to vaporize lets say Vilnius without a proportionate response.
I even think that Russian direct intervention on some non-Nato countries would provoke Nato to strike back. While Nato won't go to war for the Ukraine, I'm not so sure about EU members Finland and Sweden.
Risk worth taking though. Otherwise, next time he sees a bad dream it is going to be London or Washington.I agree but the 'you' here would be say Latvia, not the US, UK etc. What you're saying is more probable btw but I do think there's a possibility of it going the other route and Putin may take the world up on that question if the cnut doesn't die soon.
Pulling matches because there will be support for Ukraine on showWait im confused, how does pulling PL matches show support for Ukraine?
EPL clubs are going to show support over Ukraine, so China not televising those matches.Wait im confused, how does pulling PL matches show support for Ukraine?
China standing with Vlad…
Two separate issues: the PL no longer wants to broadcast in Russia, and separately China won't broadcast the PL whilst there is a big focus on paying respect to Ukraine before matches.Wait im confused, how does pulling PL matches show support for Ukraine?
What I got from it was him saying that it's not so stomach churning being used in the middle East..... Take from that what you willI don't think he's being racist? He's suggesting that the idea of it being used in the continent where he lives is stomach churning, which it is.
Not sure I see the issue in this report to be honest. People can see what they want I guess
China standing with Vlad…
We are still yeh to pull Anastasia off of Disney+Have we reached our limits when it comes to sanctions or can we afford even harsher ones? If the latter, then what's holding us back?
My best guess is that if Russian nukes some NATO country, there is going to be a small retaliation, a bit of tit for tat. Likely not nuking Moscow, but nuking some random Russian base, and putting deterrent forces in the highest alert, using the backchannels to tell Russian generals in no uncertain terms that the next time is going to be a full retaliation.
And then either someone puts Putin down, or we have a nuclear Holocaust.
Not retaliating with nukes if you get nuked makes no sense.
Concerning at the very least
As i say, people will read into it what they want, from my perspective it was suggesting that the bombs being used on civilians in a European capital is slightly different (and more relatable) then being used on caves in Afghanistan against potential terrorist threats, which really for a western reporter living/working in Europe it is!What I got from it was him saying that it's not so stomach churning being used in the middle East..... Take from that what you will
Any sign of them backing Russia is a bit concerning to our civilisation.Why?
Just means the rest of the world gets to wake up and see how these countries act to murder.
Wasn't aware of that - thanks. Then no need for Harms to chime inI was born in USSR, am native Russian speaker, but not Russian by nationality. Let me give you an example. US ambassador in my country gives a speech in local language when he congratulates citizens on some national hoilidays. The Russian ambassador gives a similar speech in Russian. An absolute majority of Russian people never learnt languages of the ex-USSR republics, despite having born and lived there for 2-3 generations.
Harms is an absolutely terrific person, that much I am pretty sure of. It takes some courage to go out and protest like he did. Hats off to him.Wasn't aware of that - thanks. Then no need for Harms to chime in
I share your opinion based on his posts, absolutely. I was only asking that he verify what you said as a Russian (not knowing your background).Harms is an absolutely terrific person, that much I am pretty sure of. It takes some courage to go out and protest like he did. Hats off to him.
He might be of completely opposite opinion to that of mine though. We all hate Putin, we all want peace and prosperity in our countries.I share your opinion based on his posts, absolutely. I was only asking that he verify what you said as a Russian (not knowing your background).
This is interesting - can @harms chime in here - is this about how it is?
An attack on nuclear forces is called a first-strike, and because the message is loud and clear ("I'm taking your nukes away"), it is to be prosecuted with nuclear weapons not conventional ones, to maximize the chances of destroying all of the launchers and bases.I'm not sure that would be wise. I could see a full scale air attack going for every known missile launching site in Russia. Probably the biggest air attack in history. If it required putting special forces in to disable facilities then so be it. The problem would be the Nuclear Subs.
I think the intention would be to try and limit the amount of sites they could launch more Nukes from. Rather than us simply trading one Nuke with another.
That guarantees a full retaliation from Russia though. It takes longer to shoot Russian ICBMs (and we don't know where many of them are) deep in Russia, then for Russia to throw them. And as you said, there are the Russian subs, who then would retaliate.I'm not sure that would be wise. I could see a full scale air attack going for every known missile launching site in Russia. Probably the biggest air attack in history. If it required putting special forces in to disable facilities then so be it. The problem would be the Nuclear Subs.
I think the intention would be to try and limit the amount of sites they could launch more Nukes from. Rather than us simply trading one Nuke with another.
That's my take, too, but if you really think about it, does he really need such a settlement? If he's forced to retreat, he could just spin it like "see? We denazified Ukraine and took out their military. There's no threat to Russians anymore". It would probably weakens his political position against people who know what really happens. But if the sanctioned didn't lead to a coup, this wouldn't either I suppose. Russia has moved past facts, they'll just sell to their public whatever suits their narrative the most.
I think the real question is: How much is the population willing to accept? We see at North Korea that "modern" dictatorships can completely dominate the population but in contrast to North Korea, the Russians actually got a glimps what freedom and luxury (relatively speaking) tastes like.