Beans
Full Member
I will help finance this, if we can get a scene where he makes out with a man.You're all wrong.
Sammy l Jackson is the obvious candidate, if only for the sheer hilarity of it.
I will help finance this, if we can get a scene where he makes out with a man.You're all wrong.
Sammy l Jackson is the obvious candidate, if only for the sheer hilarity of it.
It's currently difficult to see a path to sufficient de escalation that will allow him to maintain control of Russia... And certainly not one that protects what he sees as his legacy
In that context the anaology would be a corners animal ... Dangerously unpredictable
It may be he sees massive escalation is the only thing that might give him an off ramp and judgin his actions by conventional game theory / logic might not be the correct thing to do.
I think this is certainly the most geo politically dangerous situation for a long time 1960s or the fall of the wall I'd say?
I would be very surprised if putin stayed as leader in the medium term ... I would be even more surprised if he was alive after that
I will help finance this, if we can get a scene where he makes out with a man.
Any chance we can get somebody to slip some polonium in his coffeeI fear so. I fear that we are very close to the point of no return which then has only two possibilities: 1) Putin getting killed or 2) nuclear war.
While the first is the best-case scenario, the second is the worst-case scenario. The trouble is that all the other scenarios in the middle might be permanently lost within the next week.
So why were you happy to see 190k US soldiers invade another country?What about "The West" ?
I fear so. I fear that we are very close to the point of no return which then has only two possibilities: 1) Putin getting killed or 2) nuclear war.
While the first is the best-case scenario, the second is the worst-case scenario. The trouble is that all the other scenarios in the middle might be permanently lost within the next week.
Why don't you create a thread for that discussion? This war has feck all to do with Iraq and the US. So please take it elsewhere.So why were you happy to see 190k US soldiers invade another country?
If they retreat out of the battlefield, we should restore SWIFT connection. There's no need for innocents to have this sort of immediate economic devastation.
The rest of the sanctions can be negotiated but I would really like to see the whole Kremlin out permanently. I've had enough of this.
That said, it seems they are attacking Ukraine even while talks are happening, so feck them.
He chose his words carefully , what if he didnt choose his words carefully?
I hope you are right. I just think that the percentage for it happening is now non-trivial, although still very low.I still don't see option 2 ever happening. All the top brass have families and assets all over Europe and the US. They're hardly going to authorise an attack on their own. All this talk is for me the ramblings of a desperate man who is backed into a corner. He has been forced to show his strongest hand just 4 days into a conflict with a third tier military.
I'd imagine China are mighty pissed off he's bringing nuclear weapons into it too.
So? Maybe because you were pro US war against Iraq in 2003 and you dont want to see some western media hypocrisy/racism called out.
Agreed, there's also an element of deterring him or his successor from similar actions down the line.You are joking right?
Putin went in full pelt and his agenda is probably to take as much land as he can before sitting on the negotiation table. That being said the damage is done. If even those sanctions don't hold up it means he completely gets away with it.
You are joking right?
Putin went in full pelt and his agenda is probably to take as much land as he can before sitting on the negotiation table. That being said the damage is done. If even those sanctions don't hold up it means he completely gets away with it.
If they retreat fully out of Ukraine, the land can retaken. IF. We should only restore it when we can see they are at least 50km from the border into their own lands
Well the main reason for me is to show how people can be hypocritical. As a war sufferer I understand more than anyone in this thread how cruel war can be and I know exactly how the Ukrainian people feel injustice now. They are left alone to fight against Imperialism and expansionism.We had 19 years to talk about 2003. Many of us, myself included, have talked about it in many of those 19 years. Some of us lost friends and schoolmates in the aftermath.
Anyone bringing it up 19 years later in a specific thread can not expect others not to think he/she has a specific reason to do so.
I don't think simply giving up the land again would solve the issues we have with Putin. There's a general problem at hands and in my opinion, we need to make whole Russia feel it.
The land - yes. But the damage to the cities, lives taken, economical damage of the whole country, bridges, airports?If they retreat fully out of Ukraine, the land can be retaken. IF. We should only restore it when we can see they are at least 50km from the border into their own lands
If you are describing the Donbas especially as pro-Russian, then you may have been watching too much of Russia Today. It has a Russian-speaking majority for sure, but that doesn’t mean the people there prior to the occupation were a majority who identified as Russian and wanted either a separatist republic or to join the Russian Federation.The Ukrainians have the world's utmost respect, support and sympathy at the moment. For them to start attacking a pro-Russian region would be extremely unwise IMO.
Be interesting to see the trading floors opening moves in around 7 hours time
I'm expecting carnage and some very rich / powerful / pissed of oligarchs and potentially more problematic (for putin) than that is a bunch of the officials who facilitate things in Russia but not ones with access to bespoke Swiss banking arrangements being super pissed off
Rub will hit 300 against EUR on Monday no doubt. I see default incoming.
Russia will feel devastation for years to come whether SWIFT is there or not. They must have about 100 sanctions now. SWIFT is just the shock and awe option.
The land - yes. But the damage to the cities, lives taken, economical damage of the whole country, bridges, airports?
It's way more complicated to just retreat, say excuse me and all bans are lifted.
Also Putin already signed a treaty to recognize the separatists areas...
good
Edit: that's the whole point
EU not messing around anymore.
I agree with the SWIFT ban being in place as long as the war is officially still going on.
There's no official war going on, right?