Liver_bird
Full Member
Question, theoretically if one was to fly to Poland to cross the border would they be allowed to join the resistance movement?
What a tweet. Don't do something barbaric like ensuring a landlord doesn't get quite as much as he would normally. Instead, just order the deaths of thousands of men on an industrial scale
Hear, hear.I’m not at all religious, but I pray that I will get the full satisfaction of ramming this post right back down your throat before this is out. The choice between being the next Belarus or a member state of the EU is well worth fighting for. You are ignorant to think otherwise.
On the ignore list for now. Enough of your shit.
Question, theoretically if one was to fly to Poland to cross the border would they be allowed to join the resistance movement?
The last line shows it's a joke.Is this an actual opinion, or some idea of a joke?
Yeah. Ukraine have been asking for people with military experience to join.Question, theoretically if one was to fly to Poland to cross the border would they be allowed to join the resistance movement?
It has been for the last 50 years. We've gone to great lengths to avoid direct confrontation between NATO and Russia, and a few times it's been a close run thing.
There's every possibility that NATO getting involved in Ukraine will prompt the Russians to start launching the ICBMs pre-emptively.
Imagine how many analysts in Western militaries are studying the Russian military right now.
Question, theoretically if one was to fly to Poland to cross the border would they be allowed to join the resistance movement?
A tweet not likely to age well, if ever there was one.
Is this an actual opinion, or some idea of a joke?
Ah bugger, so it seems to be. Never mind...Not a real account according to the replies
Out of his arseAgain, absolutely no-one on here is licking their lips 'at the prospect of the Ukrainian population being absolutely annihilated'. Where are you getting this from?
If a NATO fighter downs a Russian one, or vice versa, that is nuclear war territory in reality not just actuality. Semantics will not matter should this happen.
I don't think it is, as a NFZ would incentivize both sides to avoid conflict. It would also incentivize Putin to change tactics not involving air surpremacy.
Pro Nazi US Republican congressman expressing his love for Hitler and Putin...
No it's not, you just want it to be so you can go on one of your irrational rants.And this thread is full of it. A bunch of people thinking this is Command & Conquer, and generational damage isn't being done to multiple countries.
Imagine how many analysts in Western militaries are studying the Russian military right now.
Well, we're all calling Putin "Pulter" now, and making these comparisons quite easily. If Hitler had a nuclear bomb he would have used it when he was in his bunker and losing was inevitable. So hopefully the comparisons aren't accurate.I still don't understand why people think this is a given just because Putin says so.
What I am really surprised abiut is how easily will Putin jump into nuclear war territory if one of his fighter jets are shot down. It feels surreal to read that Putin is just longing for this opportunity. It is not. He is a corrupt leader, who has done tons of atrocities and is shit scared of his own citizens. He clearly values his life and well being above all. Should NATO just continue to watch while the cnut kills thousands of innocent people defending their motherland. This is happening right in front of NATOs doors and being executed by NATOs main potential enemy. Ffs, Putin should be afraid of NATO army and its ammunition both conventional as welll as WMDs.
There have been many occasions where such has been ignored, but have there been any where it was war on the Russian border? This is a different level.Happened on the Syria-Turkey border not too long ago.
Well, we're all calling Putin "Pulter" now, and making these comparisons quite easily. If Hitler had a nuclear bomb he would have used it when he was in his bunker and losing was inevitable. So hopefully the comparisons aren't accurate.
There have been many occasions where such has been ignored, but have there been any where it was war on the Russian border? This is a different level.
Well, we're all calling Putin "Pulter" now, and making these comparisons quite easily. If Hitler had a nuclear bomb he would have used it when he was in his bunker and losing was inevitable. So hopefully the comparisons aren't accurate.
No, don’t listen to this man, the people demand to know the liquor laws of Pennsylvania!Please, don't derail this particular thread.
Time to kick Russia out of SWIFT.
Their stock market will be worth zero on Monday, probably the highest ever drop in a single day for any stock market. The Russian Ruble will also match the soviet era ruble ... almost zero as well.
But if Putin concedes a NFZ, that makes whatever he's trying to do a lot more difficult. It would be seen as direct interference (an act of war). It's like rolling the dice then as to whether it all escalates to the point where no one wants it to.I don't think it is, as a NFZ would incentivize both sides to avoid conflict. It would also incentivize Putin to change tactics not involving air surpremacy.
I agree, I think the Putin/Hitler comparisons are misplaced.It's an absurd comparison.
Agreed, but the self-economic-suicide of this whole invasion tells me that the Russians are not playing from the same playbook as before.They've basically placed a worldwide embargo on themselves and did it knowingly.Yeah there are obvious differences, but perhaps the lesson from that incident is that ultimately each side can find an excuse to overlook it/back down, if they feel it’s in their interest. I.e. nuclear war is not inevitable in the event it happens.