I said when it started that it was a strategically confusing move. If its aim was to make Russia remove forces from the Pokrovsk offensive, as the usual gaggle of "experts" (Philips O'Brien, Ben Hodges, CNN's basket of
Raytheon salesmen retired colonels) claimed, then it yet again demonstrates that 2 and a half years into this war, they still have absolutely no clue what Russia's aims are. Their obsessive focus on square miles of territory ("Ukraine has taken as much land in 2 weeks as Russia has taken in 6 months!" - Philips O'Brien, who is STILL, baffingly, sought out by the mainstream media for his 'expert views') seems to me to entirely miss the point. There's a world of difference between taking over land that is vital to Ukrainian logistics, as well as Ukraine's enconomy (they're about to lose their largest producer of coking coal in Pokrovsk, which is essential to their war effort), versus having 10 to 15,000 of your best troops wandering aimlessly around strategically insignificant Russian fields and waffling on about controlling "100 settlements!"
6 days ago, Zelenskiy - wary of another Zaluzhny situation, i.e a general who recognises what a moron he is - promoted Syrsky to a 4-star general, as gratitude for his "brilliant operation in Kursk". Yet another dumb PR-based move. You don't create generals 2 weeks into a reckless operation whose outcome is still far from known. The only reason you do this is for media attention ("Look how successful it's been!"). When those soldiers in Kursk are either routed or else forced to retreat having achieved nothing of value - the Kursk power plant was apparently the minimum goal, which isn't going to happen now - how's he going to explain the promotion? How's he even explaining it now, with countless videos doing the rounds of Ukrainian soldiers in Pokrovsk pissed off at the Kursk move.
The other reason he's done this is to put pressure on Biden to ok his fantasy "victory plan" which he's going to 'deliver' to Biden next month (spoiler alert Volodymyr, the President of the United States doesn't get 'delivered' anything by the likes of you).
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crrlnl2vqe2o
He said that its success depends on Joe Biden okaying what is in the 'plan', which drew pushback from all 3 of the White House, State Department and Pentagon press teams. But this again is typical of how Zelenskiy operates. "It's not my fault if this doesn't succeed!" You don't launch a baffling operation into Russian territory without telling the US about it, only to then 6 weeks later say "Ok America, here's the plan, and if it doesn't work, it's Biden's fault". Especially when that 'plan' is asking for a bunch of stuff that is never going to happen (it doesn't take the strategic acumen of Philips O'Brien to guess the kind of delusional nonsense that will be in it).
Tangentially related, I read an article a few days ago on Responsible Statecraft about Emmanuel Macron. It's worth a read:
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/macron-troops-ukraine/
For those who can be forgiven for not remembering him, Emmanuel Macron is the president of France. Back in February, with elections looming, he went full Napoleon and started telling anyone who'd listen that he "wasn't against" sending French troops to Ukraine, and that Putin must not win, and that every option and weapon must be on the table, and on and on and on. And then, after the elections, he promptly disappeared off the face of the earth and hasn't mentioned Ukraine since. France has continued to be the major European country that does the
least for Ukraine. Cynically using Ukraine to boost his polling turned out not to work. And the bone-deep bedrock conviction of every Western country on earth ("We are not going to war with Russia over Ukraine") remains in tact. Sure, they'll use the opportunity to "bleed Russia" (Lloyd Austin) for as long as Ukraine is content to be NATO's private mercenary army (yes, yes, I'm baiting the hyenas, I know), but fundamentally, they do not care what happens to Ukraine enough to do what would be required to have Ukraine win this war. This was true 2 and half years ago and it will remain true until Russia achieves the 4 aims of its 'SMO'. I said it back in 2016 and I repeated it in 2022: Ukraine will be sacrificed. Yes, some kind of 'Ukraine' will technically emerge from the war as "a free and sovereign nation" (that's the new stated aim of the Biden Admin by the way - they never even mention Ukraine "winning" as Ukraine has defined winning anymore), if 'free and independent' can mean 'saddled by crippling debt for generations and with 15 trillion dollars of its resources now under Russian control. But the cost of this war to Ukraine will be a functionally destroyed nation. And for spending 2 and half years calling for governments to relentlessly push for peace talks, people like me have been called 'Kremlin bots' and 'Putin sympathisers' and what have you. "You can't negotiate with Putin!" said strategic genius Jake Sullivan (have I mentioned Jake Sullivan is in my view the single dumbest political operative on the face of the earth, and I say that as someone who works for someone who has had several meetings with him) and Tony Blinken . The exact same people who are now saying that the best-case scenario for Ukraine is to put them in a position where they can negotiate with Putin. This is what happens when you have no coherent strategy*
*On that last point, back in May I made a post about how one of the stipulations of the 60 billion dollars for Ukraine was that the Biden Admin provide a strategy for the war to Congress by June 8th (because after 2 years of war they apparently still didn't have one). I posted a video of Lloyd Austin being asked by the House Armed Services Committee if he would guarantee to provide one, and he said he would. I said he
wouldn't, because they very clearly had no strategy (that 'Nato' guy who everyone's enamoured with on here instantly called for me to be banned from the forum for posting Russian propaganda - apparently the on-camera words of the US Secretary of Defense is Russian propaganda).
Well guess what? The deadline came and went and no strategy was provided.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/08/21/biden-ukraine-war-strategy-congress-military-aid/
https://nypost.com/2024/06/10/us-ne...line-for-providing-strategic-plan-to-end-war/
Exactly as I predicted. And this is why Ukraine is being destroyed. Dumb 'experts' and 'analysts' armed to the teeth with a million bar charts and pie charts and graphs and stat tables and reams of weapons info, and absolutely no coherent strategy for Ukrainian victory and no fundamental understanding of Russia and its goals. All they can do now is deliberately misrepresent what Russia's goals are so they can claim Putin 'failed'.
Alright, I'll go back to casually lurking now. See you again in a month or so when Pokrovsk is the latest city to be in ruins while Zelenskiy continues to play his stupid PR games.