VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,380
Clearing mines for an assault and removing all mines are 2 different tasks.So lets say that the UA clears 1 km of mines. Does someone that knows more of military tactics knows if it is feasable that the russian army seeds 1 km new layer at the back so they can just wait for the UA to keep losing equipement and men being sitting ducks?
Is that a possibility taking in a account mine stocks (economically and fastness of producing them) and if they can lay them fast enough?
Is that a normal tactic or i is dumb for me to think that is possible
Clearing mines for an assault and removing all mines are 2 different tasks.
Mine clearance for an assault is usually in narrow channels towards a defined objective. The remaining minefield only comes into play if you have to retreat in a disorderly fashion.
So the Russian approach is aimed at just slowing the Ukrainian advance as they dont have enough airpower to provide close air support or carpet bomb the minefields. The Ukrainians are having to set achievable goals and not get too far ahead of their air support or they will be picked off by Russian helicopters.
When the Ukranians get F16's they will be able to wipe out the Russian helicopter threat and they will potentially be able to "break out" if they find a weak spot.
Russian citizens hoping for Lukashenko to deal with a local problem:
The Wagner mutiny definitely was the biggest PR win for Lukashenko in a long time. I bet he never expected this and will be laughing all day if he hears about this.
I can see Russia taking a few out quite quickly (or taking out runways making them harder to operate), and exploiting the fact that such expensive machinery donated by the West is going to waste.
You seem to ignore the fact that Russia already isn't able to stop Ukraine from operating its MiG-29 and Su-25 fleet. If they were able to take them out they would have done so (and tried it from day one). They don't have time to prepare, they are failing for 17 months to win air superiority.Sadly I also believe this will be the case. It's the same problem with the counteroffensive. If you announce something half a year in advance, you give your enemy that time to prepare. Russians could prepare roughly half a year for the counteroffensive and we see the result now. Minefields and trenches over the whole front, many kilometers deep. Extremly difficult to overcome.
Now they can prepare half a year for a few dozen F-16. I fear the result will be similar to the counteroffensive. Russia has more than enough time to deploy their anti air and scan Ukraine for all possible runways. We just go in circles and it's frustrating. This way, the war will drag on for many years and Ukraine will continue to suffer.
You realize that’s part of what Zaluzhnyi has been saying, right?
You seem to ignore the fact that Russia already isn't able to stop Ukraine from operating its MiG-29 and Su-25 fleet. If they were able to take them out they would have done so (and tried it from day one). They don't have time to prepare, they are failing for 17 months to win air superiority.
In that regard nothing really changes once the F-16 arrive.
No they won't be enough without some sort of AWACS support, but they will hopefully create a deeper band of close Air support.I know you aren’t saying it will be, but whilst we’re on the topic of F16s, I’m not sure getting F16s will be the holy grail some people think it will be.
There is learning to fly them (the easier part), and then learning to deploy weapons systems effectively whilst flying.Training on them normally takes years, even for experienced pilots.
There are logistics and the training of engineers to support them, you need very clean and well maintained runways to avoid damaging engines. You’d probably have to have lots of western contractors on the ground, at least at the beginning.
I can see Russia taking a few out quite quickly (or taking out runways making them harder to operate), and exploiting the fact that such expensive machinery donated by the West is going to waste.
I’m not saying it won’t be a useful tool for Ukraine and they should definitely get them. But I’d warn against it being a quick and decisive route to victory.
First recorded use of cluster shells by Ukrainians?
Never seen this cat before, who is he?
Never seen this cat before, who is he?
Wow.He’s first and foremost a big supporter of Bashar al-Assad, and like all Assadists took up the cause of shilling for Putin after 2015.
They have been using them all war, as have Russia. Turkey was supplying them to the UA
Have you got any source or footage to back it up? I've seen hundreds of videos by now and I never saw Ukrainians use cluster munitions. It goes without saying that Russia has been using them since day one.
Quick google, lots of sources all said the same. As above poster says, also below.Have you got any source or footage to back it up? I've seen hundreds of videos by now and I never saw Ukrainians use cluster munitions. It goes without saying that Russia has been using them since day one.
Here we go...So there is no comment from either side about turkish cluster shells, nor is there any actual video of them being used, or is there?
Because this is the first 155mm cluster munition that can be used more precisely and with longer range than the older 152mmSo the question is why some people think that the offensive would be more effective now with the U.S supplies since they have had and used similar ammunitions already?
Is it that the amount from U.S is way higher? The quality? The range?
Or is it that some people are hyping the expectations again?
Oh I see. Thanks for the information.Because this is the first 155mm cluster munition that can be used more precisely and with longer range than the older 152mm
Girkin arrested? Interesting...
Looks like the Russians starting to feel the cluster shells at their own end. I just hope Ukraine got them in sufficient numbers to take at least the Bakhmut area.