The theory I posted is basically summarizing what Gen. Zaluzhnyi said recently when people started complaining about the speed of the offensive. Yes, not having an overwhelming equipment advantage, or overwhelming air superiority is part of it.
It is like asking ETH if he will use Dave next season before the FA final. If the theory is that the main battles will be between light infantry squads, I would be concerned because how would that be good for UA, which has a lower population and has to be on the attacking side? And there are like hundreds of miles to clear out.Yeah but what else can he say? It's not going that well?
I’m not really sure what you’re getting at here.Yeah but what else can he say? It's not going that well?
I’m not really sure what you’re getting at here.
You claimed the counteroffensive has been “a bit of a fail so far” and said you wouldn’t be surprised to see negotiations in the fall. The commanding general for Ukraine said folks need to realize what the reality on the ground is and be patient before deciding the fate of the counteroffensive.
(Seemingly) thisIt seems way too early to consider it failure, I’m not really sure what people expected.
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-20-billion-fund-stock-ukraine-military-russia-war/The EU will propose a dedicated fund to keep Ukraine’s military stocked for the next four years at a cost of up to €20 billion, according to five diplomats familiar with the plan.
The proposal would not involve the EU directly paying for Ukraine’s weapons. Instead, Brussels would help countries cover their own costs of purchasing and donating items such as ammunition, missiles and tanks. It also would help pay to train Ukrainian soldiers.
It’s an approach the EU adopted shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine. But the new proposal, drafted by the EU’s diplomatic service, would effectively turbocharge the strategy.
Ha, indeed
One of the reasons why UA seemed to stop gaining much territory at the moment is that the Russians kept dropping mines on their trenches or the areas that were already cleared. So it takes even more time now. As everyone said, without a huge amount of equipment to rapidly clear a huge area followed by rapid breakthroughs, I have a hard time seeing UA getting to where they want to any time soon. Or unless the RA runs out of those, which is unlikely soon.So lets say that the UA clears 1 km of mines. Does someone that knows more of military tactics knows if it is feasable that the russian army seeds 1 km new layer at the back so they can just wait for the UA to keep losing equipement and men being sitting ducks?
Is that a possibility taking in a account mine stocks (economically and fastness of producing them) and if they can lay them fast enough?
Is that a normal tactic or i is dumb for me to think that is possible
It's absolutely pathetic, that still no one promises to escort the grain ships in international waters even without an agreement. No Turkey, no NATO, no one. After 1.5 years of war, they still fear Putin so much that they can't even promise protection in international waters. Spineless leaders, it's so frustrating. Just watch how they will give in to some of Putin's demands, so the deal continues. And he will prey on that and use this kind of threats again and again to ease more and more sanctions.
So lets say that the UA clears 1 km of mines. Does someone that knows more of military tactics knows if it is feasable that the russian army seeds 1 km new layer at the back so they can just wait for the UA to keep losing equipement and men being sitting ducks?
Is that a possibility taking in a account mine stocks (economically and fastness of producing them) and if they can lay them fast enough?
Is that a normal tactic or i is dumb for me to think that is possible
This would probably mean breaking the treaty of Montreux and open the doof for Russia moving more ships into the Black Sea.Indeed. It's utterly pathetic, and I can also lay some blame on the US for doing feck all when those are easy points to score with countries in need of that grain.
The US Navy should have elements of its Fifth and Sixth Fleets spearheading a multinational force patrolling the international waters of the Black Sea, especially since China and Russia are already doing the same in the Sea of Japan. Feck those dictatorships and their feelings.
Vegetation in full bloom, very limited sight, everywhere holes and trenches where Russians could ambush you, narrow paths which could be mined. Those people complain about the counteroffensive's speed should watch some videos on how hard it is just to take a single position in a forest strip.
I’m not really sure what you’re getting at here.
You claimed the counteroffensive has been “a bit of a fail so far” and said you wouldn’t be surprised to see negotiations in the fall. The commanding general for Ukraine said folks need to realize what the reality on the ground is and be patient before deciding the fate of the counteroffensive.
Is that the video with people being killed at close range? Better put a spoiler/content warning on it if so.
I've personally stopped reading into this idea of Putin is 'weak' or 'strong', it's relatively clear his internal image has been dogshite for a long time but no one can do anything about it. Internationally I'd wager most governments see him as nothing more than a crook, even most of his allies. In any democratic country he'd have been hounded out of power years ago, the question really is how long will Russia suffer him now it is clear they won't win in Ukraine (not that Ukraine will 'win' either for a long time) and their economy is shot. They seized Carlsberg and Danone's in country assets yesterday which seems a desperate last resort for them long term if they want to try and attract international business back to Russia.The upcoming BRICS summit in South Africa also seems to become a bit embarassing for Putin. SA is a member of the Den Haag court and therefore would have had to arrest Putin. They did ask for an exemption from this rule, but so far none was granted.
Now it is confirmed that Putin will not attend at all. So it looks like the leader of the (until recently looking like it) second biggest power in the world no fears being arrested by a generally friendly and not that big country.
No matter what is going on on the battlefield, Putin himself looks weaker and weaker in recent weeks.
There are no kills, just some shooting into dark holes without any visible Russians there. Position looks abandoned, but the video shows how hard it is to take such positions on a daily basis. But sure, I can still put it in a spoiler.
I blame the media a little bit to be honest, they hype ukraine so much they create a lot of silly expectations on people. The way some news channels talked about the counteroffensive it made it sound like ukraine would be marching on moscow by christmas.It seems way too early to consider it failure, I’m not really sure what people expected.
I think earlier Russian incompetence and underestimating of the opposition lead to this perception that if you kick the door lightly it will collapse . Once the RA came to terms with the situation and their actual abilities, and their switch to a focus of defense (Bakhmut excluded) , which they had ample time to prepare lead to this WW1 style grind, which seemingly cannot have a quick resolution without CAS.I blame the media a little bit to be honest, they hype ukraine so much they create a lot of silly expectations on people. The way some news channels talked about the counteroffensive it made it sound like ukraine would be marching on moscow by christmas.
The media hyped their capabilities up a lot in the beginning, which they deserved for obvious reasons. But that had a lot to do with Russians being sh*t. Russians getting some of their sh*t together with new UA recruits learning the rope probably didn't meet the expectations of some.I blame the media a little bit to be honest, they hype ukraine so much they create a lot of silly expectations on people. The way some news channels talked about the counteroffensive it made it sound like ukraine would be marching on moscow by christmas.
Yeah, and not to mention that people usually ignore the noises coming from sources close to the UA army that it is not so much better than the RA in many senses. It is too rigid, too centralized, and not flexible enough.I think earlier Russian incompetence and underestimating of the opposition lead to this perception that if you kick the door lightly it will collapse . Once the RA came to terms with the situation and their actual abilities, and their switch to a focus of defense (Bakhmut excluded) , which they had ample time to prepare lead to this WW1 style grind, which seemingly cannot have a quick resolution without CAS.
These things at least can be subject to change with the gradual Nato style trainingYeah, and not to mention that people usually ignore the noises coming from sources close to the UA army that it is not so much better than the RA in many senses. It is too rigid, too centralized, and not flexible enough.
I follow the media a lot and never have I seen journalists from the likes of BBC, Reuters, CNN etc make the implication that Ukraine was going to walk over the Russians.That may all be true but I know people who just casually watch the news at dinner time and they are surprised why it's taking so long. The only media they watch created those expectations.
And who invented that narrative?I suppose the thought is that Russia's weaknesses are bad moral and bad organisation and political incompetence. The most likely expected route for the counter offensive to succeed was if soft underbellies were exposed that led to key defences crumbling and a cascade of chaos that the Ukranians could capitalise on. So far that seems not to be looking that likely.
Vegetation in full bloom, very limited sight, everywhere holes and trenches where Russians could ambush you, narrow paths which could be mined. Those people complain about the counteroffensive's speed should watch some videos on how hard it is just to take a single position in a forest strip.
These are the top 4 resultsI get if I search "cnn portugal advances in ukraine".I follow the media a lot and never have I seen journalists from the likes of BBC, Reuters, CNN etc make the implication that Ukraine was going to walk over the Russians.
It seems to me that it isn't the "media" to blame but simply people not understanding how tough the situation is for Ukraine. Maybe that's something to blame the media for but even then the media regularly invites field experts and they tend to be neutral/cautious too.