I've noticed you with some strange statements in the past about all media lie and this one is no better. Just watch the video Simbo posted a few posts above yours. It shows Bucha a couple of months ago and you can there already see how fast they were working on that famous russian armor cemetery road. Bucha was one of the most horrific sites of this war and the focus of Russia's genocide. Of course Ukraine focuses on rebuilding that region as fast as possible to not only try to heal those wounds, but also show Russians their terrorism will not prevail and Ukraine will build everything up again, no matter how much they destoy it.
No one said that Ukraine will rebuild everything in one year. But that particular site? Yes, it can and was achieved apparently. Dozens of Ukrainian reporters tweeted that picture with hundreds of thousands of followers. I've yet to see a proof that it's a fake picture before the war. I'd suggest you scale down a bit with your accusation of a fake if you can't prove it and no, those trees are not a proof.
Thanks for noticing me.
Regarding my post quotes I remit you to the start. "Bucha might be reconstructed and might be impressive but this picture is not true..."
With that sentence I don't discredit Bucha and Ukraine reconstruction nor the video that you mentioned, just the picture that are exposed as the same place. But as per
@Ekkie Thump might not be from the same place
And yes, I am very wary on anything that appears in internet, specially of the ones that favours my interests. Is in my interest that Ukraine wins the war and recovers pre 2014 borders and Russia loses and pays reparations. Aldo Ukraine to recover as fast as possible but fake pictures and data makes no favours to the cause
Then you have 2 approches, yours that is accusing me of something that is untrue and based on you "notice me" that is based on me rebating you a post in the past and being bitter about it or do like
@Ekkie Thump and propose and alternative explanation that I conclude that he might be right and is a matter of perspective and nullify my premise that the picture was from the same place that is what it was complete based on. If they were from the same place it would not make sense to plant big trees and small. but it it is from another place as is a perfect explanation from
@Ekkie Thump then my argument is incorrect
And again, I didn't criticize the war and reconstruction efforts. I criticized the picture that in my opinion is timeline fake but
@Ekkie Thump propose a perfectly plausible explanation. And of course I will not stop and you will not stop me to say what I think is wrong or right (being me wrong or right). You can debate and counter argument or you can ignore me if you don't like it