Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach

Seeing as via league is 0% then yes. I'm not so confident and worry we will see some bad games in EL as well, starting this Thursday.
The games vs City, Liverpool and Arsenal give me hope. It will be a rollercoaster ride until end of the season but I think we will improve a lot along the way.

Put it this way, EL will be easier to win than FA Cup! IMO, the strongest competitor in EL to us is only Spurs.
 
The games vs City, Liverpool and Arsenal give me hope. It will be a rollercoaster ride until end of the season but I think we will improve a lot along the way.

Put it this way, EL will be easier to win than FA Cup! IMO, the strongest competitor in EL to us is only Spurs.
There's more than Spurs who could knock us out of EL, we've 2 wins from 11, and neither was convincing
 
I don't doubt we can make top 6 if we go back to giving Rashford, Garnacho and Bruno free reign but that's a cycle we've needed to break for a while. Previously it was painful winning games and still knowing we were going nowhere. This is what tearing it up is supposed to look like in the short term. IMO he already won a lot of faith when he came in and knew the old blueprint wasn't going anywhere.
 
It's like he's one of the most exciting and sought after young classical conductors in Europe, and he's revitalised the Lisbon Philharmonic Orchestra.

And we're the promoter of a shit jazz band. And we hire Amorim to transform our shit jazz band into a great classical orchestra.

But he has to work with all the crap jazz players the last band leader brought in.

And we won't give him a violinist, instead we tell him to get a f**king saxophonist to play violin instead.

And we won't get him a cellist, instead we tell him to get the big bass player to play the cello.

And when this f**king frankenstein of a Manchester orchestra churns out absolute shite, we blame Amorim for it and give him the sack 6 months later!

Farcical!
That’s a brilliant analogy.
 
Just a thought regarding those saying he should stick to his system for the longer term gain. If these players aren't and never are going to play, be good enough, or stay in his system then why not change it short term with these players, possibly get better results, then change to his system when he has a chance to buy players he wants.

I agree a reset is needed for your club, but there seems to be a contradiction here where people are saying 'he needs to stick to his system' but also that 'these players won't be here or shouldn't be here.'

If that's the case then he might as well change the system whilst he has them... And if they are still going to be here then that system will not work anyway so what is the point?
 
Very true. But if Ten Hag couldn't get a tune out of the players that he brought in, what are you expecting from Amorim?

Hojlund, Zirkzee, Antony, Mount, Casemiro Malacia, Onana. If all left tomorrow, would a tear be shed by any United fan?

Ten Hag was barely doing any better than Amorim with this team though. W3 D2 L4 when he was sacked, 11 points in 9 games. Amorim is W3 D2 L6, so 11 in 11 but he had to face Arsenal, City and Liverpool all away from home while ten Hag only played Liverpool at home. There's hardly any difference in results between the two (which is damning for Amorim as ten Hag was absolutely abysmal).

Obviously it's a team ten Hag handpicked for more than half a billion so he gets less leeway here.
 
He also had a pre season and a transfer window. Amorim came in just as our season ramped up for the Christmas period.

Our fans want change but don't want to go through the bad period. They just expect things to magically improve. It's not Amorims fault, blame the people in charge of the club for initially sticking with ETH and then hiring a Manager who must have said what he intended on doing but not giving him any tools to do that with. It's honestly a farce.

I'm with you. The mitigating factors are clear to see, and, truth be told, i haven't seen many on here talking about significant improvements. But one way or another, you have to show that you're up to the task, that's what most are trying to say (i think). And what are these unrealistic expectations, exactly? Potter walked into his first big gig after the international break too, he also inherited a horror show (scatter gun approach in the transfers, new ownership learning on the job) and got sacked after getting 28 points in 22 matches. Do we even look like a team that can get 28 points in Amorim's first 22 games in charge?
 
I'm with you. The mitigating factors are clear to see, and, truth be told, i haven't seen many on here talking about significant improvements. But one way or another, you have to show that you're up to the task, that's what most are trying to say (i think). And what are these unrealistic expectations, exactly? Potter walked into his first big gig after the international break too, he also inherited a horror show (scatter gun approach in the transfers, new ownership learning on the job) and got sacked after getting 28 points in 22 matches. Do we even look like a team that can get 28 points in Amorim's first 22 games in charge?
Zero chance. We got 11 in his first 11 so that would require us to get 17 in the next 11. That's more than 1.5 points a game, we are not doing that on current form. Probably closer to 8-10 points getting it to about 20 points in first 22 games.
 
It's like he's one of the most exciting and sought after young classical conductors in Europe, and he's revitalised the Lisbon Philharmonic Orchestra.

And we're the promoter of a shit jazz band. And we hire Amorim to transform our shit jazz band into a great classical orchestra.

But he has to work with all the crap jazz players the last band leader brought in.

And we won't give him a violinist, instead we tell him to get a f**king saxophonist to play violin instead.

And we won't get him a cellist, instead we tell him to get the big bass player to play the cello.

And when this f**king frankenstein of a Manchester orchestra churns out absolute shite, we blame Amorim for it and give him the sack 6 months later!

Farcical!

You missed the one other farcical bit off the end though....

The new conductor knows he has got a pretty average jazz band... and he also knows that its going to be long while before he can make all the changes to the band he needs to play his brand of classical music.

But rather than adapt the set list, maybe a bit of jazz/classical fusion to bridge the gap until the changes are possible... maybe even making a few of the jazz band he wants rid of look attractive to others on the hunt for players in the process... He keeps on asking them to play back to back Mozart with no hope of them ever being able to play it.

Or in other words... being dealt a bad hand doesn't admonish Amorim from making poor, stubborn decisions.
 
You missed the one other farcical bit off the end though....

The new conductor knows he has got a pretty average jazz band... and he also knows that its going to be long while before he can make all the changes to the band he needs to play his brand of classical music.

But rather than adapt the set list, maybe a bit of jazz/classical fusion to bridge the gap until the changes are possible... maybe even making a few of the jazz band he wants rid of look attractive to others on the hunt for players in the process... He keeps on asking them to play back to back Mozart with no hope of them ever being able to play it.

Or in other words... being dealt a bad hand doesn't admonish Amorim from making poor, stubborn decisions.

Absolutely spot on

and if we want to extend the analogy further, the new conductor already could already see before taking the job that this band only knew jazz but he took the job anyway.

He's now getting them to attempt to perform classical night after night to massive crowds and then telling the music press that they're the worst classical band of all time.

Which is a shame because if he used his creative talents he could create a passable jazz-classical fusion band until his new musicians arrive.
 
Anyone thinking we can limp to the summer in 15th with this run of form continuing and then suddenly turn into a top 4 side next season is in for a rude awakening.

That's not how any of this works. He will need to build some momentum and a platform with the players at his disposal in the next four or five months.

Unfortunately, many United fans have bought into the myth again that he's definitely 'the guy' and we're incapable of being competitive until there's a full squad overhaul.
You clearly didn’t read the message you replied to, I’m actually agreeing with you and saying the club should have recruited a PL proven coach like Iraola, I actually think we have another Villa Boas situation with Amorim, slick PowerPoint presentations wonderful record in Portugal, but far too in flexible to be the next messiah of football coaching!
 
You missed the one other farcical bit off the end though....

The new conductor knows he has got a pretty average jazz band... and he also knows that its going to be long while before he can make all the changes to the band he needs to play his brand of classical music.

But rather than adapt the set list, maybe a bit of jazz/classical fusion to bridge the gap until the changes are possible... maybe even making a few of the jazz band he wants rid of look attractive to others on the hunt for players in the process... He keeps on asking them to play back to back Mozart with no hope of them ever being able to play it.

Or in other words... being dealt a bad hand doesn't admonish Amorim from making poor, stubborn decisions.
First time I’ve seen a manager not be held responsible for only knowing one tactic!

So the players are meant to be these adaptable pros who will understand every instruction from every manager, yet the manager gets to set up one formation, one playstyle and that’s feet up, job done? Makes no sense.
 
Just a thought regarding those saying he should stick to his system for the longer term gain. If these players aren't and never are going to play, be good enough, or stay in his system then why not change it short term with these players, possibly get better results, then change to his system when he has a chance to buy players he wants.

I agree a reset is needed for your club, but there seems to be a contradiction here where people are saying 'he needs to stick to his system' but also that 'these players won't be here or shouldn't be here.'

If that's the case then he might as well change the system whilst he has them... And if they are still going to be here then that system will not work anyway so what is the point?
Because we weren't exactly tearing it up last season with a more traditional formation. In fact, we ended the season with negative goal difference
Those that say the plan should be to change formations over the summer, instead of now, ignore the fact that then we would be beginning next season whilst still coming to terms with the new formation.
 
First time I’ve seen a manager not be held responsible for only knowing one tactic!

So the players are meant to be these adaptable pros who will understand every instruction from every manager, yet the manager gets to set up one formation, one playstyle and that’s feet up, job done? Makes no sense.

Yup.

And just to rub salt in the wounds... the team who rolled us over yesterday, with their brand new, shiny, young manager, played a system that they havent played all season to play to the weaknesses of the system that the KNEW they were going to face.

Not only can't our team play the system... every team know exactly how to prepare for us, because the manager literally tells the press that he only has one way of playing.
 
Because we weren't exactly tearing it up last season with a more traditional formation. In fact, we ended the season with negative goal difference
Those that say the plan should be to change formations over the summer, instead of now, ignore the fact that then we would be beginning next season whilst still coming to terms with the new formation.
No one is saying he should play ETHs suicidal 41- massive gap - 41 of the last 18 months though. Why not try and incorporate elements of the low block, compact, counter attacking 4231 that won us a cup, came third, got to another final, and a European quarter in his first season?

And for everyone saying that style of football wont get you anywhere along the progression route.... Forest say hi!
 
Mount was injured for most of that season. There were only about 5 games where both Casemiro and Mount started. From memory we played 4231 most of the time.

But his plan was to start Mount next to Bruno as an 8. That could never work.
 
Ugarte is tackler with high energy but casemiro can pass better and can actually create at times, he isn't the best at defending as Ugarte is. They aren't the same, they are very different profiles of CDM

They're not exactly the same but they're similar in terms of breaking up play and passing to the technical creative players. Casemiro a few years ago could play box to box like Ugarte.
 
Ok.
Let's say we get a manager who tells them to sit deep and make Bruno send forward balls to the wings on the counter.
The only thing these players have proven to be good at during the years.

Sure, he'll get better current results (probably).

Where does that lead us in the long term?
Vibes FC, best counterattacking team in the league? Glorified Spurs, never winning anything? We've seen that with Ole.

Play more direct to suit the team but add players, specifically in midfield who provide elements of control when needed.

I wouldn't say a few years ago when ETH led you to 3rd United were a counterattacking team. You had the 5th highest possession.

Football tactics and setup is all about balance provided by the players.
 
Play more direct to suit the team but add players, specifically in midfield who provide elements of control when needed.

I wouldn't say a few years ago when ETH led you to 3rd United were a counterattacking team. You had the 5th highest possession.

Football tactics and setup is all about balance provided by the players.

We beat you at Old trafford, scoring from a bunch of counterattacks.
The when you beat us at your place, we had only 1 shot on target. It was 3-2 after a weird Martinez header as our 2nd goal.

ETH led us to 3rd with Rashford being in the best form of his life. The moment this fell apart, we were left without a goalscorer - issue that we can't resolve to this day.

Truth is, we had a lot of worrying games where we were bailed out by De Gea and/or Rashford.
 
Play more direct to suit the team but add players, specifically in midfield who provide elements of control when needed.

I wouldn't say a few years ago when ETH led you to 3rd United were a counterattacking team. You had the 5th highest possession.

Football tactics and setup is all about balance provided by the players.
Plenty of games he had less possession than Ole had, we were very much a team that did not bother with it that much.
 
Just a thought regarding those saying he should stick to his system for the longer term gain. If these players aren't and never are going to play, be good enough, or stay in his system then why not change it short term with these players, possibly get better results, then change to his system when he has a chance to buy players he wants.

I agree a reset is needed for your club, but there seems to be a contradiction here where people are saying 'he needs to stick to his system' but also that 'these players won't be here or shouldn't be here.'

If that's the case then he might as well change the system whilst he has them... And if they are still going to be here then that system will not work anyway so what is the point?
ETH did that and never changed back.
 
ETH did that and never changed back.
Well, he did try to, in his 2nd season before it went all pear shaped with injuries and what not. First season he played a 4-2-3-1 where it fetched him results being pragmatic and 2nd season he tried to play a variation of 4-3-3 with two attacking no.8s and not being pragmatic.
 
Just a thought regarding those saying he should stick to his system for the longer term gain. If these players aren't and never are going to play, be good enough, or stay in his system then why not change it short term with these players, possibly get better results, then change to his system when he has a chance to buy players he wants.

I agree a reset is needed for your club, but there seems to be a contradiction here where people are saying 'he needs to stick to his system' but also that 'these players won't be here or shouldn't be here.'

If that's the case then he might as well change the system whilst he has them... And if they are still going to be here then that system will not work anyway so what is the point?

Because we can't replace a whole squad in the summer to come. So we work on this system now with the view that some of these players will know what to do next year so we won't be starting from scratch next season.
 
Being incapable of adapting is not a virtue, and every time we get into this players v manager debate that seems to be forgotten. This time I don't blame the players, it isn't a lack of effort or application, they just aren't good enough. This is the outcome of horrific club recruitment processes going back over a decade.

Don't blame Amorin either, we knew he wouldn't adapt and handed him a shitshow not of his making, now he is going to have rip this squad to pieces with nothing to spend and that is probably behind the rumours around Garnacho and Mainoo, will have to sell to be able to buy.
 
Fara Williams explained very well on MOTD2, it's sometimes very hard to adjust yourself from back 4 to back 3 system. How the central defenders wanted to push forward and the front 3 didn't help them at all, they didn't press high enough and left the midfield too packed.
Brighton were brilliant at giving our midfield 2 no room to turn with the ball. A lot our players aren't still very comfortable with the back 3.
 
We are One of the 5 biggest clubs in Workd Football!

Do you think Madrid, Barcelona, Liverpool or Bayern would allow any coach more than 10 League games if he’s getting 1 point per game and talking about Relegation and being the worst side in History!

If that’s what he thinks and what he’s able to achieve, WTF did we hire him?

He can’t even get his stats right when he said his team have won 2 from 10!
I’m seriously not impressed and see Iraola right now as a far better solution to the problem.

Iraola's initial results were comparably bad though, weren't they?

My worry is less the results themselves, but that I don't see any pattern of improvement in the way we are playing *and* the results are bad.


Iraola'a first 11 PL games at Bournemouth after signing in July and overseeing their pre-season:

P11 W1 D3 L7 GF9 GA27 GD-18 Pts6


ETH did that and never changed back.

Indeed, it's a trap which I'm happy Amorim has been smart not to fall for, the trap of "temporarily changing style for short-term results." Once you do that and you have a few good results (albeit with doubtful performances), it becomes even more difficult to return to your preferred system as no one would accept the poor results during bedding time after having been used to decent/less-crap results. The best (only) time you can attempt to impose a style and you can be awarded patience in the midst of the crappiest results is when you have just freshly signed and no one (:nervous:) would think of firing you right away. I just hope he has a common understanding with his bosses concerning this plan of action.
 
'What not' i.e. By playing 2 attacking midfielders, leaving Casemiro alone and exposed, and being completing overrun facing 30 shots per game.
I'm not absolving him of any blame but there were plenty of other factors too which contributed to that mess of a season.
 
Iraola'a first 11 PL games at Bournemouth after signing in July and overseeing their pre-season:

P11 W1 D3 L7 GF9 GA27 GD-18 Pts6




Indeed, it's a trap which I'm happy Amorim has been smart not to fall for, the trap of "temporarily changing style for short-term results." Once you do that and you have a few good results (albeit with doubtful performances), it becomes even more difficult to return to your preferred system as no one would accept the poor results during bedding time after having been used to decent/less-crap results. The best (only) time you can attempt to impose a style and you can be awarded patience in the midst of the crappiest results is when you have just freshly signed and no one (:nervous:) would think of firing you right away. I just hope he has a common understanding with his bosses concerning this plan of action.
This whole style debate is overdone. The best coaches have some flexibility, they don't obsess about a rigid system. Certainly Fergie adapted, as has Pep, Slot doesn't obsess about a system which by all accounts a key reason he was chosen. I liked Amorim as an appointment but the rubbish he is serving up is a concern with no sign of improvement. All this 'trap' stuff around changing styes is just BS. A top coach can set up a team to get results, our squad is poor but we should not be getting schooled on the ball by Southampton at home. People say ETH changed and then didnt go back, but his high press chaos ball and no midfield was a close variant to how Ajax played, just with a better overall team and one playing in a hugely inferior league where its shortcomings were masked.
 
2027 - we win the league and you guys are saying "I was wrong" or are not posting anymore.
A plausible future also.
 
It’s January 2027, after consecutive bottom half finishes for Manchester United they once again languish at 12th as Amorim is still trying to drill ‘the system’ into the team.
Yeah, I find it mental to think that professional players that have largely played well for other teams (even top teams for some of them) can't adapt to play a couple of different formations.

I don't understand it, but yet I watch the horror show unfold nearly every game, so apparently it is the case.
 
Yeah, I find it mental to think that professional players that have largely played well for other teams (even top teams for some of them) can't adapt to play a couple of different formations.

I don't understand it, but yet I watch the horror show unfold nearly every game, so apparently it is the case.

I'm not sure how much of it is tactical awareness though. If you drill Dalot to tactical perfection it won't change the fact he does not have the footballing ability to be a Premier League attacker.
 
If we're getting outplayed by bottom half teams by end of season then sure he can go, but no one is losing sleep in January that we're not adapting quick enough to finish 8th.
 
If we ask our new Manager to adapt his tactics to suit the squad then we're simply falling back into the same trap of the previous few Managers where they have to use a system they aren't comfortable training in. Remember when all of you lost your collective shit because ETH decided to play a style that wasn't his Ajax style? I remember. You're now all asking Amorim to do exactly this. It's bonkers. Just be patient and accept that this season is going to be a shit show but it will give us medium/long term gains. Stick with the Manager and his tactics. Allow him, the staff and club to identify the players that simply cannot adapt to this system and we attempt to get rid and replace in the Summer. We'll be stronger in the long term if we go through this process now. Why not go through this process in a season that was also trashed by ETH? We can play for the cups.
 
If we ask our new Manager to adapt his tactics to suit the squad then we're simply falling back into the same trap of the previous few Managers where they have to use a system they aren't comfortable training in. Remember when all of you lost your collective shit because ETH decided to play a style that wasn't his Ajax style? I remember. You're now all asking Amorim to do exactly this. It's bonkers. Just be patient and accept that this season is going to be a shit show but it will give us medium/long term gains. Stick with the Manager and his tactics. Allow him, the staff and club to identify the players that simply cannot adapt to this system and we attempt to get rid and replace in the Summer. We'll be stronger in the long term if we go through this process now. Why not go through this process in a season that was also trashed by ETH? We can play for the cups.
People are trying to get history to repeat itself and as bad as Ten Hag was we don't acknowledge the part we played. This was just last year.

Ten Hag: 'We will never play the football we played at Ajax here,' 'I now have other players, that's not why I came here.' 'The player material you have determines how you will play. That's why we play here in a different way than I did at Ajax. That will have to be the case, because I can't play the same way here. 'That is not in the DNA of Manchester United at all. The football at Ajax is very typical, here we will play much more directly. We also have the players for that, especially at the forefront.'
Same movie. Apparently some tool in the hierarchy told him to adapt to the players and he had to come up with these weird, two headed, homunculus hybrid tactics where the attack and defence looked like they were coached by different managers. Let Amorim cook. If he fails, he fails on his own merit.
 
That's untrue. ETHs second season, you played 433 not 4231. He moved from a double pivot to isolating an aging Casemiro in midfield with Mount and Bruno in the 8s. Those two together provide zero balance and wrecked the cohesion from your 22/23 campaign.
There was also many injuries and it seemed some mismanagement.

Amorim not coaching a system before is irrelevant. Footballs about principles regardless of the system. People like you just overcomplicate a simple game. Coaching is far too overemphasized in modern football than it actually is. This is why I feel Pep has confused a lot of football people; fans, pundits etc. The game is simple, pick a system and style which suits your players confidently perform and win matches.

Too many football manager heads nowadays
This post is a reminder of the fifa playing modern football fan, where they think by changing formation, play pacey players everything will be rosey.. This isn't the real world.. tactics, philosophies, styles are fundamentals that most top managers these days stick by.. Amorim was hired for having just that.. A system that he knows and has always coached and has worked for him, so it would be bonkers to change that now because the poor players can't play it. Those who can't, will be coached to learn it, and if there is no hope, then they'll be replaced. In this system, the wingbacks are specialists and are the most important part of the team, and until he gets them, it's going to be tough. He's the right person for the job, and will turn it around. It's not his fault that the club had a terrible terrible manager and a board just as bad during the last few years, but one has to admire RA for believing that he will turn it around.