phelans shorts
Full Member
feck - misses the Newcastle game, hopefully Berba can put in a great away performance - much like the one against Everton earlier this season.
He wont get a ban.
feck - misses the Newcastle game, hopefully Berba can put in a great away performance - much like the one against Everton earlier this season.
What?He wont get a ban.
He wont get a ban.
He wont get a ban.
I'll have someone to keep me company in the tennis threads now
He wont get a ban.
Is Enigma still raging his anti Nadal campaign?
Congrats on the cricket btw, great final.
He wont get a ban.
You also rubished the idea that he'd get charged. Then rubbished the idea they'd suspend him from games if they did.
They couldn't act on it because the ref had seen it, bias didn't come into it.Rooney got away with the elbow a few weeks ago, so they have to show that they are not biased towards United. Rooney will be banned for no less the 2 games.
You also rubished the idea that he'd get charged. Then rubbished the idea they'd suspend him from games if they did.
The FA's decision has been questioned by Professional Footballers' Association chief Gordon Taylor.
In a statement issued on the PFA website, Taylor said: "Whilst the use of foul and abusive language is not condoned, there is an acceptance by all parties within the game that 'industrial language' is commonly used.
"It becomes an issue when directed towards match officials. However, when used in a spontaneous way in celebration or frustration then it is not normally expected to merit a sanction.
"If sanctions are to be imposed in such circumstances then this has to be done in a balanced and consistent manner, and participants made aware of this fundamental change in approach."
They couldn't act on it because the ref had seen it, bias didn't come into it.
However this will be bias if they ban Rooney for 2 games whilst so many other players swear on the pitch and no-one bats an eyelid.
They'll word it cleverly so that it's justified and doesn't leave them having to ban other players in the future.
He can't not get banned now. One game is the minimum when you challenge the punishment and not the charge itself.I said he won't get banned all along, nothing has changed.
He can't not get banned now. One game is the minimum when you challenge the punishment and not the charge itself.
He can't not get banned now. One game is the minimum when you challenge the punishment and not the charge itself.
Anyone who thinks City fan and ex chairman Bungstein will allow Rooney to play against his beloved bitters are being extremely naive.
Anyone who thinks City fan and ex chairman Bungstein will allow Rooney to play against his beloved bitters are being extremely naive.
The FA's decision has been questioned by Professional Footballers' Association chief Gordon Taylor.
In a statement issued on the PFA website, Taylor said: "Whilst the use of foul and abusive language is not condoned, there is an acceptance by all parties within the game that 'industrial language' is commonly used.
"It becomes an issue when directed towards match officials. However, when used in a spontaneous way in celebration or frustration then it is not normally expected to merit a sanction.
"If sanctions are to be imposed in such circumstances then this has to be done in a balanced and consistent manner, and participants made aware of this fundamental change in approach."
I said he won't get banned all along, nothing has changed.
But he did act upon it, he awarded a freekick after seeing Rooney run into the other player. He just didn't see it clearly enough to notice the elbow.its exactly because the ref saw it and still decided not to act on it, that people deemed it as biased.
The obvious change is the fact the FA have since given him a two-match ban. The punishment United are now appealing.
Apart from that, yeah, nothing has changed at all.
So will the media go crazy about Crouch telling the ref to F*** off in front of all the children?!
So will the media go crazy about Crouch telling the ref to F*** off in front of all the children?!
The FA's decision has been questioned by Professional Footballers' Association chief Gordon Taylor.
In a statement issued on the PFA website, Taylor said: "Whilst the use of foul and abusive language is not condoned, there is an acceptance by all parties within the game that 'industrial language' is commonly used.
"It becomes an issue when directed towards match officials. However, when used in a spontaneous way in celebration or frustration then it is not normally expected to merit a sanction.
"If sanctions are to be imposed in such circumstances then this has to be done in a balanced and consistent manner, and participants made aware of this fundamental change in approach."
I am fairy sure of two things, he said "fcuk off" and secondly, children don't watch Spur's play so even if he had said the bad word, it won't have been that bad.
I am fairy sure of two things, he said "fcuk off" and secondly, children don't watch Spur's play so even if he had said the bad word, it won't have been that bad.
Anyone who thinks City fan and ex chairman Bungstein will allow Rooney to play against his beloved bitters are being extremely naive.