Ron Vlaar

Nice to see people ignoring his performances for Villa over the last 2 years then.

Not sure. There is clearly a good defender. Not good enough for us, but he is decent.

Look at Gary Cahill. People were laughing at Chelsea for signing him because of how many goals Bolton were conceding. It's not easy for Vlaar playing alongside all these young defenders at Villa.
 
I was surprised when he went to Villa to be honest. He has always struck me as a good defender and could play at a higher level than a woeful Villa side.

He has had a brilliant WC and fair play to him. Not saying I want him here, but he is definitely better than a Villa player.
 
Not sure. There is clearly a good defender. Not good enough for us, but he is decent.

Look at Gary Cahill. People were laughing at Chelsea for signing him because of how many goals Bolton were conceding. It's not easy for Vlaar playing alongside all these young defenders at Villa.
This is the key point, I think somewhere like Southampton would be his level esp when Lovren leaves. I really don't think he's much more than a decent, honest centre half for all that he's had a very good world cup.
 
and we've been used to playing with CB's who have decent pace, aside from the last season of course.

Unlike in a tournament, CB's in a challenging Prem side, need to able to push up & have the pace to cover counter attacking forwards, like Suarez, (oh wait, not Suarez ;)) er, Aguero (oh wait, he's fecked) er, come to think of it, who's the quickest forward our CB's will face this season???
 
Concrete Ron was the best player on the pitch last night.
 
If he has any sense he'll look for a big money move to the likes of QPR, or some other more-money-than-sense club now that his stock is at an all time high and people have forgetting that he's been pretty pony since joining Villa.
 
Vlaar was great last night, he's not the player for us...different player for club vs country.

Would love us to get Hummels far far better.
 
I don't know why people are quick to dismiss him as an option for us? No one is saying he'll set the world on fire - heck, no one is saying he'll even be first choice. But it's a position we need cover in, at a club who need money, and so we could probably get him at a relatively cheap cost. I would take him over Vermaelan, who spends the majority of a season injured.

It's funny how quick people are to dismiss players on some stereotype impressions of a player.

Is he a world class CB? No. Is he good enough to be a first choice at a top club? No, probably not. Is he a decent cover option? Yes, I do think he is.
 
He's been solid enough for Villa, but surely we're not going to sign him on the basis of 6 good games? Look at Chile's back 3, club form is much more important.
 
I don't know why people are quick to dismiss him as an option for us? No one is saying he'll set the world on fire - heck, no one is saying he'll even be first choice. But it's a position we need cover in, at a club who need money, and so we could probably get him at a relatively cheap cost. I would take him over Vermaelan, who spends the majority of a season injured.

It's funny how quick people are to dismiss players on some stereotype impressions of a player.

Is he a world class CB? No. Is he good enough to be a first choice at a top club? No, probably not. Is he a decent cover option? Yes, I do think he is.
Villa won't let him go cheap, and I doubt he will be happy to sit on the bench. He isn't really good enough to be a main starter for us so it's a no go in my eyes.
 
and we've been used to playing with CB's who have decent pace, aside from the last season of course.

Unlike in a tournament, CB's in a challenging Prem side, need to able to push up & have the pace to cover counter attacking forwards, like Suarez, (oh wait, not Suarez ;)) er, Aguero (oh wait, he's fecked) er, come to think of it, who's the quickest forward our CB's will face this season???
Sturridge, Sterling, Hazard, Willian, Benteke, Navas, Walcott, Remy, Schurrle etc... There's more than enough pace to threaten in the league
 
Sturridge, Sterling, Hazard, Willian, Benteke, Navas, Walcott, Remy, Schurrle etc... There's more than enough pace to threaten in the league

Yep. I was thinking out & out no.9's but they seem to be a dying breed - Schurrle - how many starts will he get?
Anyway cheers ;)
 
Yep. I was thinking out & out no.9's but they seem to be a dying breed - Schurrle - how many starts will he get?
Anyway cheers ;)
Yeah, more teams are going for more slower but perhaps technically gifted forwards to bring the pacey wingers/inside forwards into play.
 
I think De Vrij has been just as good, although he did give away the penalty against Spain. He's also 7 years younger
 
I think De Vrij has been just as good, although he did give away the penalty against Spain. He's also 7 years younger
It was a phantom penalty in his defence. Poor call. I do agree de Vrij has looked equally impressive; Vlaar is very last ditch, no-nonsense, de Vrij has looked assured and composed, bringing the ball out when he has been surronded by a fair few players not very good on it (Janmaat, Vlaar, Wijnaldum).
 
Wouldn't mind him if we sign two CB's. Should need experience with Rio, Vidic and Evra gone in defence.
 
I'm with you there.

But then I've always thought Vlaar was a decent defender... hampered massively by a shoddy defense and an often non-existant midfield at Villa...

If LVG can make Vlaar perform like has done at this World Cup... why not?

29 years old, PL experience and in the last year of his contract at Villa, if the plan is to give Jones and Smalling the chance to cement themselves then he seems an ideal signing to me.
 
29 years old, PL experience and in the last year of his contract at Villa, if the plan is to give Jones and Smalling the chance to cement themselves then he seems an ideal signing to me.

Exactly, some of our fans think every player in the squad needs to be a huge name and are dubious about anyone with a price tag under £30m.

He's a leader, has experience in the league and with Louis, big, strong, brave and good in the air which are all attributes that Vida was still our best at last season.

As for playing for Aston Villa, good players sometimes end up at small clubs, Martin Laursen was excellent at Villa for example even though it was towards the end of his career.
 
Good in a 532 or 352, not good in a 442 or 433, 4231 etc.
 
Last edited:
Would we even have this thread of LvG wasn't managing him with the Dutch? It's Ron Vlaar ffs I know we've just come off the back of a poor season but we aren't in this much trouble.

He's an average player and unless we're gonna sign someone at centre half who's guaranteed to be first choice it's pointless signing one. We have enough problems with getting a solid back line going as it is, we need someone who's a starter.
 
I think De Vrij has been just as good, although he did give away the penalty against Spain. He's also 7 years younger

De Vrij has been better, for me. Also, with a higher line, Vlaar being very slow and only getting slower would be trouble.

I'm really starting to wonder why we didn't just give Rio one more year. He didn't play that badly last year, Evra and Vidic leaving means we're a bit short on experience and unless we sign a top CB, I'm not sure Vermaelen or whoever we end up with will do any better.
 
Because there's the least pressure on, knowing you have 4 to salvage it if he misses.
Bullshit. You let your best penalty takers take first. They score, someone in other team misses. Chances are you won't need the 5th taker. Every penalty counts the same. Probably more pressure on a decisive penalty but after that I reckon the biggest pressure is on the first taker. No one has scored and he can immediately take the lead. Statistics also show that the team that scores first from penalties usually wins.