MalcolmTucker
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,818
Why does anyone care about 'the general play' for a pure no 9? Same with CB's and fullbacks. Its insane.
We had great 'general play' last night but lost, and OleOut want to sack OGS anyway.
No 9 are there to score goals. That is their only metric. And Lukaku is bossing it on that front for Inter, and did well enough for us on that front too.
Sorry but this might be one of the stupidest posts I've ever read on here
Do I really have to explain to you how being able to control a ball, being able to consistently pass to a team mate and being able to create as well as score goals might be beneficial as a forward? As for as CBs and FBs, you've literally ruled out 'general play' for 50% of the players on the pitch - are only the midfielders meant to actually have good general play? Have you watched any football since 1983?
Liverpool just won the league and their number 9 scored 9 league goals this season so your understanding of what a number 9 does is dated to put it kindly. Even so, even by your own 'metric' Lukaku's goalscoring record for us wasn't good enough to mask his shortcomings. If we look at his PL stats, he got 16 and 12 goals in his two seasons here. That's pretty average for someone who by your own admission is there to only score goals. Rashford and Martial beat those goal tallies and better goal to minute ratios with Greenwood having the best goal to minute ratio of all 4.
It's honestly baffling that there are still people who think Lukaku would work here when we literally had two years of him and in turn us being ridiculed for his bad play. Meanwhile our front 3 have outperformed his stats this season while also being able to trap a football and actually being able to score against teams in the top 6.
Last edited: