7even
Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
You can add Vidic, Evra, Rooney, Nani and Ronaldo to that list.
Kagawa, DDG, Valencia and Chicaritho also falls to that category. Just mention..
You can add Vidic, Evra, Rooney, Nani and Ronaldo to that list.
Agree. Its nice to get one over on a rival club, but i prefer us to find our own heroes, rather than buying another clubs.
Sure you do...
Sure you do...
I'm sure he'll do very well here for a couple of seasons, but I don't think he'll ever feel like a United player.
I'd be no less confident about the coming season if this signing hadn't happened so it's all a bit meh for me.
RvP was Arsenal's hero, that makes him our mercenary in my book. He's someone who might score 30+ goals next season, and I'd celebrate them all, but his name would never go on the back of my shirt (if I were still into having other men's names there).
Gotta wish him good luck though. He'll need it.
I'm sure he'll do very well here for a couple of seasons, but I don't think he'll ever feel like a United player.
Jesus. We just signed the leagues top scorer and player of the year and you find it a bit meh What the feck is wrong with you?
Cantona, Cole, Yorke, Sheringham, Rio, Carrick were all big players and or heroes at their previous clubs.
WE found none of them. We purchased based on their already existing quality.
Did you object to any of these in the same way as RVP?
What's price, age and wages got to do with someone saying he doesn't want to sign heroes from other clubs?
This.
I'm completely unexcited about this one. It seems that we've given in and have attempted to buy the league back this summer, especially if we'd brought in Lucas too. If Fergie can get that final CL under his belt then I'll be happy for him, but this is such an un-Manchester United signing for me. Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
This.
I'm completely unexcited about this one. It seems that we've given in and have attempted to buy the league back this summer, especially if we'd brought in Lucas too. If Fergie can get that final CL under his belt then I'll be happy for him, but this is such an un-Manchester United signing for me. Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
And I remember games like Newcastle at home, Wigan away and City away when we either did not take our chances or did not create any.
Michael Owen spent most of his time at Liverpool and Newcastle.Cantona, Cole, Rio and Carrick have were all at United longer that at any other club.
I don't object to RVP, im just saying that when he retires, i feel he will be remembered primarily as an Arsenal legend.
Though hopefully, he does enough at United to change that.
Yes but the price, wages and age of those players (combined) is completely incomparable, in truth.
Rio is probably the closest, but he was 7 years younger when we got him.
It's funny how many Arsenal fans are saying now it's a good business for the club to get £20m for an injury-prone player who had one year left on his contract. Don't they remember how amazing he was for them last season and he won player of the year?
I wonder if people actually enjoy football, on the pitch, or they've started enjoying business in football.
Oh I'm sorry, are we not comparing the players here? Funny, I thought that's generally supposed to be the case when someone lists names that are used as examples to compare to the situation we have with our newest signing.
This.
I'm completely unexcited about this one. It seems that we've given in and have attempted to buy the league back this summer, especially if we'd brought in Lucas too. If Fergie can get that final CL under his belt then I'll be happy for him, but this is such an un-Manchester United signing for me. Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
The players don't look at the price nor think of the age. We've signed a quality player and the dressing room will be buzzing.....Sometimes you have to make statements, and that's what we've done but in the process we've bought a really good player.
This.
I'm completely unexcited about this one. It seems that we've given in and have attempted to buy the league back this summer, especially if we'd brought in Lucas too. If Fergie can get that final CL under his belt then I'll be happy for him, but this is such an un-Manchester United signing for me. Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
Agree. Its nice to get one over on a rival club, but i prefer us to find our own heroes, rather than buying another clubs.
Players can become "heroes" at any age. You've been idolising Nani since he was 22. If another club signed him this summer would they not have signed one of United's "heroes"?
With the tactics that Fergie employed against City away, Van Persie wouldn't have made any difference.
This.
I'm completely unexcited about this one. It seems that we've given in and have attempted to buy the league back this summer, especially if we'd brought in Lucas too. If Fergie can get that final CL under his belt then I'll be happy for him, but this is such an un-Manchester United signing for me. Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
I don't understand this logic. We've spent more on Rooney and Berbatov in the past. What's the big deal really? Did we buy the league when we bought Young for 18 million? And if not, then at what point does a signing indicate that?
Buying the league? We did some terrific business already this summer, Kagawa for just £12m will turn out to be a mega-bargain. If Mark Ogden's numbers are true we 'only' spend £15m upfront on RVP, with an additional £7m relating to performances and success on the pitch (and I guess we'd all love to see the club pay the whole fee in exchange for trophies). How this is any way comparable to Manchester City, a club which blew everyone out of the market and paid obscene figures (mainly in wages, and therefore inflating the market) even for squad players is beyond me.Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
I don't understand this logic. We've spent more on Rooney and Berbatov in the past. What's the big deal really? Did we buy the league when we bought Young for 18 million? And if not, then at what point does a signing indicate that?
And the reason why people think City bought the league is:
A) Because their spending was completely disproportionate to everyone elses as were the wages they offered.
And more importantly,
B) Because without their suger daddy they would be languishing in the lower depths of the league. Their revenue was completely disproportionate to their income. Without external help of the Arabs, could you see them paying the wages and fees that they have? On the other hand, we would be able to buy Van Persie with or without the Glazers.
This.
I'm completely unexcited about this one. It seems that we've given in and have attempted to buy the league back this summer, especially if we'd brought in Lucas too. If Fergie can get that final CL under his belt then I'll be happy for him, but this is such an un-Manchester United signing for me. Hope I never hear people talking about City buying the league ever again.
But that doesn't have to be the case always. If we got a chance to sign Messi tomorrow would you say no for that reason? The point is that while I agree that it feels great to make stars, the club's interest comes first. Always.
Maybe someone could explain to me the exact cut-off point in terms of age at which point we're supposed to not be allowed to consider a new signing as a United player?
Van Persie just turned 29, so that apparently rules him out. Carrick and Vidic were 25 when we signed them. Do they make the cut? Eric Cantona was 26
You're weird.
It's 20 mil, not 50 mil or 100 mil for 3 players.
No, we lost it
Carrick and Vidic were 24, and it tends to be the players over 24/25 which don't seem to fit in. Owen, Berbatov, Seba, Hagreaves and so on. We're a club which has long been all about lengthy terms of service, and when a player comes to the club later in their caree and only sticks around for a couple of years it just doesn't feel at all the same. You can say that that's just football, and we've been spoilt by Fergie's way of doing things, but the point is that that's how we've been doing things for decades, and any other way is just going to feel a bit hollow. It is like being City, as your man above was attacked for saying, and when it comes at the cost of spending a season watching a young Mancunian lead the line then, yeah, it sits very uneasily with me.