I think Stoke are the perfect example of hype and glamour playing the defining role of people's views of PL teams. Throughout the season we've heard comments like this:
great to see players going to such "small" clubs, it shows how highly the premier league is rated and of course money plays its role. Also some players might use it as a next step in their careers as premier league is more in the spotlight than any other league I'd say. Who would have thought that Stoke may have Affelay -Bojan - Shaqiri attacking trio one day
This trio of big club rejects may be glamorous but they've had a negligible impact in the league. If Southampton beat them today they'll be in 9th place, exactly the same position they've been in for the last two years. The easy response to that is to say they haven't moved forward because the rest of the league have all improved, but it's not about that. They have the 6th worst attack in the league - worse than the much less glamorous attacks of the likes of Sunderland and Norwich. None of Affelay, Bojan or Shaqiri feature in the
top 100 players in the league. Shaqiri was subbed off today after just half an hour because he was so ineffectual, and that's been true for many of his appearances.
They may have a "great" team on paper in the eyes of PL fans but the reality is very different and is frequently proven in Europe.