Renato Sanches

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think people are harsh on him here. I never watched him live, just the videos, but to suggest he is average when he is just 18 and really made a name for himself this season is a bit over the top. And all the other alternatives, who says Ruben Neves or Thielemans want to move anyway? or to us? If we are after a young CM, then he is the best we can get. I dont see us going for a top CM anyway, they arent available or gettable, so why not go for a gettable talent instead. Dont think the price will be as high as mentioned in the media. The biggest drawback for me is that he is a Mendes client.
 
I think people are harsh on him here. I never watched him live, just the videos, but to suggest he is average when he is just 18 and really made a name for himself this season is a bit over the top. And all the other alternatives, who says Ruben Neves or Thielemans want to move anyway? or to us? If we are after a young CM, then he is the best we can get. I dont see us going for a top CM anyway, they arent available or gettable, so why not go for a gettable talent instead. Dont think the price will be as high as mentioned in the media. The biggest drawback for me is that he is a Mendes client.
He looks crap. 18 or 28, he just doesn't look like a player with much to build on.
Way too casual, without the technique to back it up.

His best skill appears to be making the pitch look bobbly, and under/over-hitting pretty much every pass he makes.
 
If you ask me this is the equal of calling the ones that don't agree with you stupid.

If that equates to calling everyone stupid, it's a good thing I have not asked you. Wow!

However, I do apologize if it will make it well with you. This is a Renato Sanchez not a @the hea v @dichinero
 
I've never seen him play, but if he is already capped for Portugal aged 18, and considered a regular for Benfica, he can't be anywhere near as bad as some on here are making out

If he comes, I'll be happy and be excited to see how good he really is for myself
 
He looks crap. 18 or 28, he just doesn't look like a player with much to build on.
Way too casual, without the technique to back it up.

His best skill appears to be making the pitch look bobbly, and under/over-hitting pretty much every pass he makes.

:lol: dont be silly, of course it makes a difference. What do you expect technique wise? He isnt the next Pirlo
 
Before you put words in mouth.

I don't know how much of Neves you watched before his drop in form because before his drop in form, he was putting in some quality performances in Europe. And how you have concluded that Porto is all a sudden an inferior team to Benfica is beyond me.

Tielemans is playing in the Belgian league, so what? Did you take into account the level of performances he has been putting in over the last 3 years?

Lewis Cook is playing in the championship, is that the basis for your argument or have you actually watched him enough to make that judgement because Dele Alli like I have said was playing for MK Dons, need I say more?

You asked for players in the same age bracket but 2 years in not comparable? Have you taken into account the physical development of the player in question?

You have repeatedly based your argument on two games in the CL against Zenit (not sure whether stages make all the difference) I have based mine on over 10 games across the season to say that he is ok but not as special as you lay emphasis on.

I agreed with you that Neves was a good prospect but he hasn't been as influential as Sanches for his team. Benfica are top of the league and still in the CL, thats why I called Porto inferior.

As for Tielemans and Cook, if you don't think that the level of the opposition matters when assessing a players ability and potential I just have to agree to disagree with you.

2 years is a huge difference at this age, the age from 16-20 is probably the most important for any football player this is the age where the best are sorted out from the rest so I don't think it's fair to compare an 18 year old to a 20-21 year old.

I'm not sure if I have watched 10 games with him or less, I don't count but the 2 Zenit games are the once that really convinced me he could become a really special player in the future.
 
:lol: dont be silly, of course it makes a difference. What do you expect technique wise? He isnt the next Pirlo
What makes a difference?

He looks really poor technically. Like one of those players who seems to have really poor ability to read the bounce of a football, has poor pass appreciation, dribbles loosely (leaving the ball behind one time and then overrunning it the next) He generally plays with the casual style of an autopilot technically gifted player, without being technically polished at all.
And this wouldn't be too bad if he were a winger. But he's supposedly a midfielder.

You build a game on technical ability.
You could see Robben's dribbling ability as a kid. He honed it.
You could see van Persie's tight control and shooting at 18. He honed it.
You could even see Nani's dribbling as a kid.
Go through any top player and the skills they became known for were in evidence from day one.

This guy shows nothing to build on at all. But maybe I'm just watching his very worst performance videos. I hope so.
 

Watched a couple of these videos for him. Maybe they just happen to be the really average-poor games, but he looks dodgy.

He looks like one of those players who always makes the pitch look really bobbly and uneven. The ball always looks like it's escaping him. Which leads to him making most of his passes in a hurry and/or on the stretch.

Really loose touches, but can make up for it due to being athletic and quick. Which allows him to get to the ball first. He wouldn't be first to the ball nearly as often in a better league.

It appears that he he thinks he's a better passer than he actually is. His passing isn't very natural, so whilst better passers can do it accurately on autopilot, he just ends under/over-hitting half of his passes. He's not good enough to play as casually as he does.

Wouldn't expect much of this guy.


This is exactly how he's been in the games I've watched, the fact he's powerfully built with natural athleticism covers up for the shortcomings in his game on the ball in a poor league. I think I mentioned before that he's like Bolasie where he is never in full control of his body and the ball at the same time when trying anything bar the simple stuff.

His physical attributes have understandably caught the eye, and if the fee was sensible for such a raw player I could see being interested, but £40M up front? ridiculous for what he is.
 
This is exactly how he's been in the games I've watched, the fact he's powerfully built with natural athleticism covers up for the shortcomings in his game on the ball in a poor league. I think I mentioned before that he's like Bolasie where he is never in full control of his body and the ball at the same time when trying anything bar the simple stuff.

His physical attributes have understandably caught the eye, and if the fee was sensible for such a raw player I could see being interested, but £40M up front? ridiculous for what he is.
Definitely. Bolasie has the same gift of making every pitch look like a Sunday league one with bobbles everywhere. He also has the ability to make every bouncing ball look like a Rugby ball that's been grubber kicked.
 
Last edited:
I agreed with you that Neves was a good prospect but he hasn't been as influential as Sanches for his team. Benfica are top of the league and still in the CL, thats why I called Porto inferior.

As for Tielemans and Cook, if you don't think that the level of the opposition matters when assessing a players ability and potential I just have to agree to disagree with you.

2 years is a huge difference at this age, the age from 16-20 is probably the most important for any football player this is the age where the best are sorted out from the rest so I don't think it's fair to compare an 18 year old to a 20-21 year old.

I'm not sure if I have watched 10 games with him or less, I don't count but the 2 Zenit games are the once that really convinced me he could become a really special player in the future.


You do realise that other than Benfica, Sporting, Porto and maybe Braga, the rest of the teams in the league are not as competitive as the Championship teams. Lewis Cook would not look out of place in the league and I reckon he could out perform Sanchez. Tielemans is a far superior talent to Sanchez regardless of what you think of the league he plays in. He played in the CL as a 16 year old too you know.

Age should really give an indication of experience if physical development is not an issue. It would be ridiculous to compare a physically developed 18 year old Sanchez to an 18 year Oliver Torres for example. For Torres' size, there is no way he would have made it into the Athletico Madrid side at 18, but he is still a superior talent to Sanchez.
 
Bruh, you wanna quote me on that? You seem to just be looking for a cyber confrontation. I have not called anybody stupid, you just took my post out of context and made it personal. And I repeat just chill out!

Oh behave.
 
You do realise that other than Benfica, Sporting, Porto and maybe Braga, the rest of the teams in the league are not as competitive as the Championship teams. Lewis Cook would not look out of place in the league and I reckon he could out perform Sanchez. Tielemans is a far superior talent to Sanchez regardless of what you think of the league he plays in. He played in the CL as a 16 year old too you know.

Age should really give an indication of experience if physical development is not an issue. It would be ridiculous to compare a physically developed 18 year old Sanchez to an 18 year Oliver Torres for example. For Torres' size, there is no way he would have made it into the Athletico Madrid side at 18, but he is still a superior talent to Sanchez.
I don't know about that, Tielemans has been rubbish this year, his performances have been way below what Sanches has been producing, Tielemans at any price is a really big risk. It's been reported too that he has an attitude problem.
 

Watched a couple of these videos for him. Maybe they just happen to be the really average-poor games, but he looks dodgy.

He looks like one of those players who always makes the pitch look really bobbly and uneven. The ball always looks like it's escaping him. Which leads to him making most of his passes in a hurry and/or on the stretch.

Really loose touches, but can make up for it due to being athletic and quick. Which allows him to get to the ball first. He wouldn't be first to the ball nearly as often in a better league.

It appears that he he thinks he's a better passer than he actually is. His passing isn't very natural, so whilst better passers can do it accurately on autopilot, he just ends under/over-hitting half of his passes. He's not good enough to play as casually as he does.

Wouldn't expect much of this guy.


I agree on that video, he looks very average.

Take a look at this one vs. Zenit. He seems more composed and dictates more the tempo.


He's not your typical stylish , technical Portuguese player, even less midfielder.
 
I can't believe people are considering him to be average, he is one of the biggest talents in football if you ask me.
The guy is 18 and is one of the best players in a team about to play in the CL quarterfinals.

To compare him to some other talents and what they had achieved at the same age:

Verratti: had played a hand full of Serie B games.
Pogba: had started 0 senior matches.
Alli: had a fair bit of League 1 apps but hadn't played any matches at the same level that Sanches has been playing.
Barkley: had 2 PL starts
Weigl: had only played senior matches in the German Regionalliga, it's the 4th tier.
Koke: 9 starts in La Liga.
Oliver Torres: 0 starts for Atletico.
Saul: 0 starts for Atletico.
And then Januzaj? And where is he now. Pointless comparisons.
 
FFS does anyone remember how average players like Schweinsteiger or Fletcher looked at the same age? Kid is fantastic.
Fletcher and Schweinsteiger did not cost north of £30m at the age of 18.

I agree with your point but with the money involved, I think fans are right to be sceptical.
 
Fletcher and Schweinsteiger did not cost north of £30m at the age of 18.

I agree with your point but with the money involved, I think fans are right to be sceptical.
Think you're right about the money thing, let's hope he pays off like Martial. If he costed £5m I think we'd be relatively happy but the prices being quoted are very large.
 
I can't believe people are considering him to be average, he is one of the biggest talents in football if you ask me.
The guy is 18 and is one of the best players in a team about to play in the CL quarterfinals.

To compare him to some other talents and what they had achieved at the same age:

Verratti: had played a hand full of Serie B games.
Pogba: had started 0 senior matches.
Alli: had a fair bit of League 1 apps but hadn't played any matches at the same level that Sanches has been playing.
Barkley: had 2 PL starts
Weigl: had only played senior matches in the German Regionalliga, it's the 4th tier.
Koke: 9 starts in La Liga.
Oliver Torres: 0 starts for Atletico.
Saul: 0 starts for Atletico.

What he is achieving at 18 years old is meaningless, the only thing that matters is what we think he can achieve at from 18 to 35, does he have the tools to be a top player, are these tools easy to unlock?.
 

Watched a couple of these videos for him. Maybe they just happen to be the really average-poor games, but he looks dodgy.

He looks like one of those players who always makes the pitch look really bobbly and uneven. The ball always looks like it's escaping him. Which leads to him making most of his passes in a hurry and/or on the stretch.

Really loose touches, but can make up for it due to being athletic and quick. Which allows him to get to the ball first. He wouldn't be first to the ball nearly as often in a better league.


It appears that he he thinks he's a better passer than he actually is. His passing isn't very natural, so whilst better passers can do it accurately on autopilot, he just ends under/over-hitting half of his passes. He's not good enough to play as casually as he does.

Wouldn't expect much of this guy.

That's actually exactly what it looked like the other day when I watched Portugal. I realized it, as I read this.
 
Fletcher and Schweinsteiger did not cost north of £30m at the age of 18.

I agree with your point but with the money involved, I think fans are right to be sceptical.

To be fair, the price of the average player has increased drastically so using like for like money comparisons isn't really effective.
When Schweinsteiger & Fletcher were 18, the average price for an 18 year old wonderkid was about £5-10m.

Plus Fletcher & Schweinsteiger were youth products that came through the ranks so wouldn't have "cost" as such.
 
I agree on that video, he looks very average.

Take a look at this one vs. Zenit. He seems more composed and dictates more the tempo.


He's not your typical stylish , technical Portuguese player, even less midfielder.


He doesn't look very impressive in that video either. There's absolutely nothing there that suggests he's potentially a top player.

I actually thought he played pretty well for Portugal the other day. His athleticism is very impressive in fairness. You could tell he had the trust and respect of much more senior Portuguese players too. He looked a very limited player technically though.
 
Based on youtube, he reminds me of Anderson when he first arrived at United. He has that combination of speed and energy with the strength and center of gravity to hold opponents off the ball. Like Anderson, he behaves like a winger at times, even though he is really a central midfielder.

I'm not sure about his touch, but his ability to break up attacks and then move the ball to his teammates is impressive. He could do the defensive dirty work alongside a midfield partner who is then given the freedom to orchestrate.
 
Think you're right about the money thing, let's hope he pays off like Martial. If he costed £5m I think we'd be relatively happy but the prices being quoted are very large.

It's funny that people (not you in this case) use Martial as an example like he came out from nowhere. The fact that Monaco paid £5m for him as a 16 year old says a lot. He may not have been known on this shores but he was clearly talented.
 
I'm on the camp of don't want this lad.Looks like another player whose athleticism made him stand out at youth level.
 
Last edited:
I'm on the camp of don't want this lad.Looks like another player whose athleticism made him stand out at youth level.
Journalists who cover Portugese football say he's been one of Benfica's best players since he made is debut. So it would mean he's also impressing at senior level.
 
After the Martial signing, I have full faith in the club's scouting department. If they see something special in Sanches and are comfortable paying a justifiable fee, then I'm onboard.
 
Journalists who cover Portugese football say he's been one of Benfica's best players since he made is debut. So it would mean he's also impressing at senior level.

Nah rather let the ppl talk that have never seen the lad. If he was English ppl on here would wank themselves silly.
 
I'm on the camp of don't want this lad.Looks like another player whose athleticism made him stand out at youth level.
But he's standing put at senior level as well.

I don't know where I stand on the guy, I've seen matches where he has shown lots of promise and games where I wasn't sure if he was playing. Pretty much like any 18 year old.

Comparisons with Martial are interesting to me. Let's say we had a competitive attack and weren't reliant on Martial, he'd get less minutes and still impress but maybe not shine as brightly as he has due to less minutes.

I do not want to be in a position where we are as reliant on Sanches as we are on Martial so that means I want Sanches playing less minutes. However he's going to cost upwards of £30m. He'd get slated for not playing as often as a £30m player should. How does he deal with that criticism?
 
But he's standing put at senior level as well.

I don't know where I stand on the guy, I've seen matches where he has shown lots of promise and games where I wasn't sure if he was playing. Pretty much like any 18 year old.

Comparisons with Martial are interesting to me. Let's say we had a competitive attack and weren't reliant on Martial, he'd get less minutes and still impress but maybe not shine as brightly as he has due to less minutes.

I do not want to be in a position where we are as reliant on Sanches as we are on Martial so that means I want Sanches playing less minutes. However he's going to cost upwards of £30m. He'd get slated for not playing as often as a £30m player should. How does he deal with that criticism?


I don't think anybody is saying that he is bad, that would be silly. People are just stating that his performances does not justify his hype at all, even for an 18 year old. It is in the same vein as saying that Felipe Anderson is worth, say £80m. While Sanchez might improve, he is nowhere near the level of other CMs his age bracket. Even for 18 year olds, there is a certain level of performances that should warrant the hype as "the best young CM in the world" but he is honestly not showing it, at least not now. In the last 12 months I have watched a lot of U21 players performing at seriously impressive levels, individually, but Sanchez is not one of those based on what I have seen.
 
I don't think anybody is saying that he is bad, that would be silly. People are just stating that his performances does not justify his hype at all, even for an 18 year old. It is in the same vein as saying that Felipe Anderson is worth, say £80m. While Sanchez might improve, he is nowhere near the level of other CMs his age bracket. Even for 18 year olds, there is a certain level of performances that should warrant the hype as "the best young CM in the world" but he is honestly not showing it, at least not now. In the last 12 months I have watched a lot of U21 players performing at seriously impressive levels, individually, but Sanchez is not one of those based on what I have seen.

Bullshit. Is this darling Ruben Neves for example playing decently for Portugal? I really think people overestimate how impressive a young CM needs to be to prove he has talent. Hardest position on the pitch to play without experience for me.
 
Bullshit. Is this darling Ruben Neves for example playing decently for Portugal? I really think people overestimate how impressive a young CM needs to be to prove he has talent. Hardest position on the pitch to play without experience for me.

Your point being?
 
I agree on that video, he looks very average.

Take a look at this one vs. Zenit. He seems more composed and dictates more the tempo.


He's not your typical stylish , technical Portuguese player, even less midfielder.

I already watched that one, and I don't see what's good about it.
Seems like he's really just great at being athletic and having a bit of a gallop, which allows him to get to the ball that he often controls/dribbles loosely. Even the way he jumps for bouncing balls/headers is off-putting.

What's he actually good at doing with a football at his feet?
 
I already watched that one, and I don't see what's good about it.
Seems like he's really just great at being athletic and having a bit of a gallop, which allows him to get to the ball that he often controls/dribbles loosely. Even the way he jumps for bouncing balls/headers is off-putting.

What's he actually good at doing with a football at his feet?

 
That's the type of reception I would expect for a superstar player. Curious to know why he's getting that kind of reception?

Because he's been incredible for the most supported team in Portugal this year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.