Eboue
nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
It sounds like god has some real jealousy issues.
No, the point is, in contrast to the steadfast love God shows those who love him, his wrath is continually over those who hate him, from generation to generation and there is also a sense in which your cultural upbringing has a consequence, yes. We all know that to be true. If a father is a scarlet, unrepentant sinner, then there are consequences for his sons/daughters.
There's no reason to take the bible literally though, is there? It's not (supposedly) dictated word for word by god like the quran, but rather a collection of stories of the creation of the world, the lives of prophets, the life of Jesus, some letters and a doomsday prophecy. The only literal words of god in it would be the ten commandments.To be fair, as much as I think Herman's a loon, if you're going to be religious, you might as well be a literalist. Otherwise what are you actually believeing in? Your own version of someone elses fiction? Which may be more paletable, but is still another fiction removed from the original. You're basically just making up your own morals, like a normal person, but adding in a God that doesn't fit for convenience.
In a weird way, I have some small vestige of respect for people who go full on nutty religious. Those who choose to disregard half the stuff are having their cake and eating it.
It sounds like god has some real jealousy issues.
There's no reason to take the bible literally though, is there? It's not (supposedly) dictated word for word by god like the quran, but rather a collection of stories of the creation of the world, the lives of prophets, the life of Jesus, some letters and a doomsday prophecy. The only literal words of god in it would be the ten commandments.
I've given a few of the reasons for my faith in Christ but it seems like you're asking what led me to the place where I was able to even consider the Biblical claims, or those of any other religion? I'll let you answer before I give my response. I don't want to misinterpret your question. I am happy to answer that question if it is the one you're asking.
Love is jealous. It's not the strictly human jealousy you're thinking of which is the tendency to covet things you shouldn't, which comes from pride. I should have what my neighbour has, etc.
So you admit that this statement does not apply towards towards those who worship him?
"You're wrong, you harlot!"I've often wondered what religious people would think if aliens ever came to earth and they had a different god.
Your skygod is a vindictive, jealous, insecure douchebag. Thankfully he's nothing more than a creation of the human psyche, and most people with sense can now see this. Your belief in him is an absolute joke.
It's strange. I don't particularly feel compelled to sit in a thread for atheists and tell them how all their convictions are a joke and insult things I don't believe in.
It's strange. I don't particularly feel compelled to sit in a thread for atheists and tell them how all their convictions are a joke and insult things I don't believe in.
Well hopefully you'll come back to me with some answers to my earlier questions Herman but far from being all wrath and jealousy I might focus on these texts, maybe; -Indeed. Now could you please identify who God is for me, oates. If I was somebody who didn't know him but wanted to, who would you tell me he is?
It's strange. I don't particularly feel compelled to sit in a thread for atheists and tell them how all their convictions are a joke and insult things I don't believe in.
Well going from atheist to believing the word in the bible is literally true is a massive leap. I'm just wondering what caused that jump. As an atheist I can't imagine anything happening to me or being said to me that would make me question whether I was right or wrong nevermind converting to the extent that I believe that the bible is literally true.
No, you would rather sit in a church with your fellow Christians to hear how the non-believers are going to be tortured in Hell for eternity.
I wouldn't have either. I was lucky enough to engage with a Christian family in debate on the subject, back when I was a fire-breathing atheist and though they didn't tell me at the time, they prayed for me after the long and mostly insulting (on my behalf) debate I had with them. My worldview fell apart in about the space of two weeks following that and when i told them what had happened they told me they'd been praying for me. I am not going to list all the details and reasons for my old worldview falling apart. The significant thing was that I wasn't looking at things the way I used to, with the same old blinkers on. The Bible describes God as opening Lydia's heart to the truth in the book of Acts and the scales are described as falling off Paul's eyes. The same thing happened to me by the grace of God.
Well hopefully you'll come back to me with some answers to my earlier questions Herman but far from being all wrath and jealousy I might focus on these texts, maybe; -
A perfection of his character which he exercises towards his creatures according to their various circumstances and relations "(Ps. 145:8, 9; 103:8; 1 John 4:8). Viewed generally, it is" benevolence; as exercised with respect to the miseries of his "creatures it is mercy, pity, compassion, and in the case of" "impenitent sinners, long-suffering patience; as exercised in" "communicating favour on the unworthy it is grace. "Goodness and" "justice are the several aspects of one unchangeable, infinitely" "wise, and sovereign moral perfection. God is not sometimes" "merciful and sometimes just, but he is eternally infinitely just" "and merciful." God is infinitely and unchangeably good (Zeph." "3:17), and his goodness is incomprehensible by the finite mind" "(Rom. 11: 35, 36). "God's goodness appears in two things, giving" "and forgiving."
They talk of an infinitely merciful God I suppose Herman.
Shall we talk a bit about your church for a while Herman? Can you tell me what the Clarendon Trust has to do with Newfrontiers?
I wouldn't have either. I was lucky enough to engage with a Christian family in debate on the subject, back when I was a fire-breathing atheist and though they didn't tell me at the time, they prayed for me after the long and mostly insulting (on my behalf) debate I had with them. My worldview fell apart in about the space of two weeks following that and when i told them what had happened they told me they'd been praying for me. I am not going to list all the details and reasons for my old worldview falling apart. The significant thing was that I wasn't looking at things the way I used to, with the same old blinkers on. The Bible describes God as opening Lydia's heart to the truth in the book of Acts and the scales are described as falling off Paul's eyes. The same thing happened to me by the grace of God.
There are millions of people who share your experience, only with reference to another religious truth. Whether it's the truth of the Quran, the Catholic Church, the Book of Mormon or countless other 'truths'....they all believe, with just as much sincerity as you do, that their experience was a spiritual one and a revelation of truth. Your experience is not unique or special, and it certainly is not evidence of what you claim it to be.
So you are quite happy to quote texts that say that he loves his people and show this steadfastly while saying that these people will not go to Heaven to be with him, in addition ignoring the fact that he is an infinitely merciful God?Oates, your quarrel isn't with me it's with God. You don't accept the gospel. I accept all of the scriptures you give to me on the goodness of God. I'll say it again, it is God's good purpose to bring as many people as will freely come to his Son, the Lord Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins. There is no other way that man can be saved. That is God's plan of restoration for man and the whole creation. Salvation is by faith alone in Christ alone. That's the gospel. I'd prefer you just accepted or rejected it rather than trying to obfuscate and bring in red herrings.
Well he did do that several times Malcolm.Couldn't he just save time by appearing in front of us all?
Well he did do that several times Malcolm.
Well he did do that several times Malcolm.
So you are quite happy to quote texts that say that he loves his people and show this steadfastly while saying that these people will not go to Heaven to be with him, in addition ignoring the fact that he is an infinitely merciful God?
I also have to feel that I've had no quarrel with God but that it seems that you are at odds with the Bible itself.
Au contraire mon ami, it is you that is having the trouble. However I can understand your difficulty.I am not ignoring anything. I've stated the gospel, which testifies of the goodness of God and his steadfast love and forgiveness. I can see you're still having trouble with this.
When? I must have missed it. I miss so much living in Japan.
I think several very good artists have attempted to 'capture' his image down the centuries.Not since the development of cameras, interestingly.
It's strange. I don't particularly feel compelled to sit in a thread for atheists and tell them how all their convictions are a joke and insult things I don't believe in.
I think several very good artists have attempted to 'capture' his image down the centuries.
I think several very good artists have attempted to 'capture' his image down the centuries.
Now, back to the Claredon Trust. Can you explain its relationship to your church and its function?
I did see what you done there.That's not at all the sane thing.
Herman, I understood that you attended a church within the Newfrontiers group, is that not so? Have I got that wrong?My church or all newfrontiers churches? I don't have a clue about the latter. Obviously you're leading somewhere with this, so feel free to divulge your information to me (in a private message would be most helpful) and I will bring up any concerns with the pastor of my own church.
I think several very good artists have attempted to 'capture' his image down the centuries.
As usual Malcolm, you are in possession of more information than I am.Weren't they forced to do it on threat of death? I'm sure I heard that recently.