Spoony
The People's President
That's racist. You actively won't employ a white Jinn.
Why is black magic evil whereas white magic's pure and full of goodness?
Racism.
That's racist. You actively won't employ a white Jinn.
It's a totally awesome argument. You will believe nearly any shit some scientist tells you as long as it coincides with your worldview.
Hmm. Religious flock do the same when clergy speak.
The ironing is delicious.
The religious on FB are lapping up Kirk's 'Unstoppable' movie. I read about his 'Monumental' film and that it was criticized by, well basically anyone that understands history while not being clouded with religious bias.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monumental:_In_Search_of_America's_National_Treasure
Monumental has received mixed reviews. Joni Eareckson Tada, a renowned author and radio host, wrote, "Informative... Enlightening... Amazing... these are the words that aptly describe my response to this remarkable movie." Francis Chan praised the movie's message, saying "After seeing this film, I have never been more proud of our country’s heritage and more concerned about our future."[11]
Americans United for Separation of Church and State’s Joseph L. Conn wrote "The theme of the movie seems to be that the Pilgrims came to America seeking religious liberty, and they set up a model Christian community that we ought to emulate today," and continued "Well, here’s some news, Kirk and Company. The Pilgrims and Puritans did come here seeking religious liberty, but they set up a regime that gave freedom only to themselves, denying it to others. In keeping with its religious viewpoint, Plymouth Colony prescribed the death penalty for adulterers, homosexuals and witches, whipping for denying the scriptures and a fine for harboring a Quaker." He ended his review saying "Don’t be misled by Kirk Cameron’s charming smile. It masks a chilling agenda." [12]
Gawker's Rich Juzwiak, in a review titled "Kirk Cameron: A Bigot in Pilgrim’s Clothing", said the movie "is too petrified to say anything, a relic of this era of the shameful bigot who’ll spew hatred and then get mad when it’s recognized as such. Monumental is a neutering of even Cameron’s cowardly waffling, in which he stood by his comments about homosexuality … while clarifying that he loves gay people and don’t [sic] think they should be mistreated. Last night, he didn’t even have the balls to be contradictory." [13]
Radio commentator Glenn Beck said, "This is A) a great movie to see. B) a great movie to bring your kids to, and teach them about the history of our country, and C) it is important, because we need to start supporting people that are doing things like this..." [14]
The documentary was reviewed in episode 74 of The Cognitive Dissonance Podcast (along with fellow podcaster George Hrab guesting).[15] The hosts criticized it for the elements of revisionist history, bias, and general poor quality.
Anyone who prescribes movies as a good way to learn the history of anything needs re-educating.
Anyone who prescribes movies as a good way to learn the history of anything needs re-educating.
That is incredibly disturbing. I can usually laugh these things off, but that one is too much. I'm actually horrified.
How anyone can look at that and go "yeah, that's a good message" is beyond me. They must be severely twisted.
What's the problem with the message? Don't lie, forgive, be thankful, etc. I'd say that's a pretty good message. The presentation however is a bit weird. And using 'Collosians 3 something' as actual song lyrics is also weird. Having said that I have no idea about the background of whatever show that is and clearly it's all edited.
What's the problem with the message? Don't lie, forgive, be thankful, etc. I'd say that's a pretty good message. The presentation however is a bit weird. And using 'Collosians 3 something' as actual song lyrics is also weird. Having said that I have no idea about the background of whatever show that is and clearly it's all edited.
The presentation was extremely creepy, and that's ignoring the fact that there's a bunch of kids running around in circles happily singing "OBEY OBEY OBEY THIS PLEASES THE LORD".
"Clearly it's all edited"? It's a music video, of sorts. That's how they work.
The presentation was extremely creepy, and that's ignoring the fact that there's a bunch of kids running around in circles happily singing "OBEY OBEY OBEY THIS PLEASES THE LORD".
"Clearly it's all edited"? It's a music video, of sorts. That's how they work.
Ciderman I like the documentary you posted, havent had time to watch the whole thing but looks very interesting. Let's see what the old chap has to say.
Is it a music video? I thought it was a montage of clips from various different songs.
"Only way we could know what happened in the past is if someone was there to tell us".
Now that's just sound logic right there.
What is your definition of agnosticism?David Mitchell is one of many people I've seen that misunderstand the definitions of 'agnosticism' and 'atheism'. He says that agnosticism is the most rational position is as though it's a mid point between theism and atheism, when in fact anybody who does not completely accept theistic claims is an atheist ("I'm not convinced there's something").
"I'm not ready not reject it" makes it sound like atheism is claiming no God exists, which not the case. You can choose not to believe 'X' without saying anything about 'Y'.