RAWK Goes Into Meltdown | 2013/14
- Thread starter Buchan
- Start date
RAWK are making fun of us appointing van Gaal.
It's the last thing they wanted. They were praying we would stick by Moyes. Now we have a winner with huge character.
PhaseOfPlay likes this.RAWK are making fun of us appointing van Gaal.
Who is that phase of play gimp? Half the posts are like: 'ooh I'll just wait to see what phase of play thinks before I'm brave enough to give my own opinion (as long as it agrees with his!)'
Long story short, failed coach/local school boy coach who thinks he's the big billy bollocks and knows how the real world works. Quite funny as well.
RAWK are making fun of us appointing van Gaal.
Sure they are! Guess they know their days of champions league football are gonna be short lived. We go (back to the europa league) again! (as they say!!)
Please tell me that's a (male) Dipper cleverly stealing a couple of footballs.
They broke it twice in one summer. Money is nothing to Real.
Whatever happened to that Andy of Allerton twat?
Didn't Real state they made more revenue from Beckham merchandising than his actual transfer fee cost?
Granted 75-100m is much more than 25m and Suarez has a tenth of the commercial appeal of Beckham.
Not quite that simple. The club (and the player if it's in his contract) gets their share and it's individually in every case - but it's something like 100% to manufacturer for the first 1000 (random number) shirts, 50% (random number again) to the club and 50% to the manufacturer for the other usually.
But still it's incredibly hard to earn the transfer fee back on the shirts, you're right.
Also got banned from caf's newbie forum.
IIRC, the shirt manufacturer makes the money. The club gets the "sponsorship" payment from the manufacturer in return.
The club could of course, make a huge chunk back on image rights from the player etc. But the whole shirt sales thing is a bit of a myth and it would be very, very difficult to calculate the effect 1 player has on shirt sales. For instance, most fans who buy replica shirts, would buy them regardless of whether the club signed player X or not. They might simply just change the name on the back of the shirt. There will obviously be some plastics following players (and not clubs) - who'd buy their shirts, but the manufacturer would benefit there.
The club could obviously, in the long run, re-negotiate their contract to earn a bigger sponsorship deal.
They definitely said it about Ronaldo.
With us, yes, but not for Madrid. I've read in a lot of different places that they get a chunk of the actual sales too.
Their policy. I think that it started with Sir Alex Ferguson being autocorrected to Mr. Alex Ferguson and then continued with AVB being autocorrected to Luís André de Pina Cabral e Villas-Boas. The funny thing is that if in a small post you write AVB several times, then that post becomes almost unreadable after the autocorrection. If they had autocrrected Van Gaal or LVG to that big name then I'll enjoy writing LVG several times in my posts there.
Nope. He said that it is a good appointment (unlike to last time when he said that Moyes will miserably fail). He seems to rate Van Gaal and his coaching methods.
The imaging rights make Madrid an absolute fortune, Ronaldo's fee has reportedly been paid back over and over already, Madrid players can afford to leave for less wages and still be better off due to gaining back control of their imaging. Shirt sales go hand in hand with Madrid's imaging and hence allows them to pay these ridiculous fees.
Back to the original point Madrid could simply pay Suarez release fee and be guaranteed the increased revenue from shirt sales and imaging rights will go a long way to cover the outlay. If they want him, they will get him, plus Liverpools shirt sales might take a small boost from the requirement for a seemingly recurrent shirt burning.
Interesting. The unwashed are amass on facebook re posting that Mirror article about his quotes saying that this season 'will be hilarious'.
To be fair he was right if he said that.
Fecking Madrid
I wouldn't be too mad. If the rumoured numbers for our incoming deal with Nike are anywhere near true (and it's not an unreasonable assumption - they're in line with the huge hike in our shirt sponsorship money from Chevy), then our income from that deal will far outstrip Madrid's even with their slice of the sales. That's especially impressive given how much of their commercial might is build on merchandise (as opposed to ours, which leans more towards sponsorship.)
Fecking Madrid
Wouldn't surprise me 1 bit.
Their shirt sponsorship will reflect it though.
We signed our Nike deal in 2001 or 2002 and it was worth nearly £30m a season. Real recently renewed with Adidas for just over £30m a season while we are looking at double that from our next sponsor.
Just think, one day all our debt'll be paid off and we can start buying every good player under the sun.
RAWK Goes Into Meltdown
These things start quietly and grow. Van Gaal does something that a player or group of players are not happy with. The players start criticizing him behind his back. Then giggs comes on board and agrees with them. And very quickly the butterflies flap of its wings becomes a tornado and the morale of the team drops. Im not saying it will happen, but it could.
For all successful coaches, one thing is certain. They have full control and authority. giggs is a big personality in the dressing room. PLayers respect him. Ferguson always was quick to get rid of these types of individuals when they crossed the line. keane, ince, stam, beckham. Fergsuon said it himself: the minute a player starts dictating how the club should be run, it spells disaster.
Giggs i hope will be quiet and on the sidelines.
Seriously? Never knew that.
That lad was a fake.
That's a highly improbable scenario that could happen with anyone.
Replace Giggs with RVP. Replace him with Mata or De Gea, or Rooney. Replace him with unnamed assistant coach that that Van Gaal himself brings. He develops good relationships with players and when things go south he does what you wrote for Giggs. It could happen with all of them.
Yeah! That was fun. I should have been more active back then.
not so much from shirt sales though...a club will make a max of a tenner a shirt...all the rest goes to kit maker, advertising etc.
But what they did recoup back plus some more was from all the advertising with Beckham becoming a world wide brand.
Torres ( Hard to believe) has allegedly been worth millions to Chelsea through similar circumstances ( not huge like beckham though) with him being Samsung and Adidas golden boy appearing in all the adverts plus the smaller companies in partnership with Chelsea/Adidas/samsung. hence one of the reasons why he is still there. He brings in revenue to help pay back the 50m ( because it sure aint for footballing reason
)Seriously.. the above posts are pretty boring for those looking to have a good laugh a RAWK which this thread is obviously supposed to be used for.
Yea but you wouldnt replace them with someone held in such regard. Its assistant manager so its not a deal breaker. ferguson had mike phelan who was the polar opposite of ferguson. When Brian kidd started questioning ferguson on who he was buying, he was out the door pretty fast. Its just my opinion but i would have went for someone like nicky butt as assistant. Someone who is inconspicuous and stays quite.
You are inferring as well that things go bad and then giggs starts questioning the manager. I am saying that things go bad the minute giggs questions the manager and thats when it goes downhill.
What happened with moyes was he lost the support of key people. Scholes, giggs and the senior players. Its a bit like the roman senate in that when the emperor lost the support of key allies within the senate, he lost his job usually. The class of 92 were great players but they are a bad influence. It bears similarities to how liverpool went, in that all these footballers retired and went into the media and started questioning what subsequent managers were doing. The man in charge simply cannot run the club with these voices.
And the fans as well hold them in high regard. If paul scholes came out tommmorow and said Van Gaal was a bad choice as a manager, Van gaal may as well get a new job straight away. The presence of these guys, scholes and giggs in particular carry so much weight, and when they are not happy the players, fans and board of directors feed into it.
How do you know what Nicky Butt is like as an assistant? Or Ryan Giggs?
Your post is filled with weird scenarios, hypotheticals and guessings, none of which is important to your original post, that Ryan Giggs would be a bad influence if things go bad.
There's just no reason to believe so, no matter what his standing with the club is.
Your post is filled with weird scenarios, hypotheticals and guessings, none of which is important to your original post, that Ryan Giggs would be a bad influence if things go bad.
There's just no reason to believe so, no matter what his standing with the club is.
Sorry Julius...you're sacked fella.
You are fired, alan sugar style.
Happened to louis already, king louis that is; the french revolution got him. Once you lose support, you are doomed
The assistant takes part of training. His job is not to motivate players, thats where the manager comes in. So nicky butt or anyone would make a good assistant as long as they are knowledgeable about the game and have good interpersonal skills.
Hypotheticals yes, guessings, well everything is speculation. I dont know what you are talking about weird scenarios. It is pretty simple. van Gaal has a huge ego. he falls out with players. Now i am suggesting that if a player falls out with him and giggs sides with that player maybe not publicly, then you have a serious problem.
One of the reasons moyes faltered is that he lost the support of key people in the club from early on. Ferdinand was tweeting, G neville and David may were on tv, as was scholes. RVP didnt like the training. Danny welbeck threatens to quit. All this leads to a manager who isnt respected, the morale is low and the team suffers
When ferguson was in charge this rarely happened and when it did, it was dealt with swiftly.
Now i am entitled to my opinion as much as you are to yours, so please dont insult my post by saying it is weird. What i am suggesting happens in clubs all across the world. Disagreements happen in football and many of them happened under ferguson and he was ruthless in getting rid of them.
I would have preferred kluvert to come in because he would unconditionally back van gaal regardless of what happened.
Knock Knock
Who's there?
Rawk-goes-into-meltdown.
Rawk-goes-into-meltdown who?
........................................................?
Who's there?
Rawk-goes-into-meltdown.
Rawk-goes-into-meltdown who?
........................................................?
There is no rule that the assistant has to take any training sessions. It was the case under Ferguson because he preferred to delegate but by all accounts Van Gaal is a much more hands on guy who considers himself as much a coach as a manager so there may be very little need for Giggs to take any sessions. If he does he has experience taking them in order to pass all his coaching badges as well as his short time in charge at the club.
Moyes lost the support of key people because the players quickly came to the conclusion through his coaching and the results they brought that he wasn't up to much. If Van Gaal suffers the same then the problem will be his coaching (not likely to happen) or the results not the fact that he hasn't been surrounded by yes men who will back him no matter what.