"If Celtic can do that, twice, why cant they win the Champions League
This is a serious question "
Definitely CL winning performance
RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2012/2013)
- Thread starter Plan M
- Start date
- Status
Definitely CL winning performance
Surprised they got the ball that much to be honest. It goes to show though, doesn't matter much of the ball you see if you make it count when you've got it.
Waaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh waaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
The only row on that graphic that counts for anything is the top one.
If United won a CL Final with the stats in the left column would anyone enjoy it any less? feck no.
Well done Celtic.
If United won a CL Final with the stats in the left column would anyone enjoy it any less? feck no.
Well done Celtic.
Spot on. He should be given far more credit for his ability to pull all that above off than the Bush administration is given for orchestrating 9/11.
Note: For the record, I find 9/11 conspiracies insane, and SAF conspiraces as well.
I don't believe it... is it legit?
That surely is a CL record, perhaps a UEFA record.
No disrespect to Celtic at all.
I would have enjoyed the win immensely if I it was United instead of Celtic, but that is beside my point. Winning the CL by Celtic means pulling off 5-6 miracles like last night's together.
Well, it depends on their luck in the draw. With a bit of good fortune they could avoid the best sides until the semi-final. Remember, in 2008 Chelsea got the semis by beating Olympiakos and Fenerbahce.
They'd need miracles from the semi-final onwards though, in all probability. And getting that "Chelsea luck" with the draw would be a miracle in itself.
How is it possible to have 11% possession over 90 mins?
I mean even with a few long balls etc. you should be able to get to 20%.
I mean even with a few long balls etc. you should be able to get to 20%.
The possesion thing is bullshit. It has been measured by the amount of passes which is really stupid. The percentage of possesion should be measured by the time teams had the ball, in which case Celtic had about 34%.
955/(955+166)=85%, not 89%.
Ismail you crazy...
Shows, for me that high possession keep-ball is fecking boring. Love that Celtic one with those stats.
You're right Excal, I didn't calculate it. Anyway in UEFA's web page it was 34% (or 36% cause I don't remember) so I though that that was the case.
We're mssing out on an action-packed Europey League match, according to RAWK's in-game commentary:
Does anyone know what Liverpool's Co-efficient is?
I mean if they went out in the group stage of Europa this year, would they be in pot 3/4 next time the CL comes around?
I mean if they went out in the group stage of Europa this year, would they be in pot 3/4 next time the CL comes around?
I'm actually watching it off and on.
That situation didn't look that totally catastrophic, though. Typical drama queens.
They're 18th at the moment with City one place behind. Assuming they don't qualify for the CL next season they'll be way down by the time they get back in; providing they ever actually manage that.
08/09 - 23 points
09/10 - 24.585
10/11 - 15.671
11/12 - 3.050
12/13 - 5.514
Edit: feck off Damien
Beaten
RANDOM FACTS
Manchester United have won more Champions League Games in 6 weeks than Liverpool have won league games at Anfield in the whole of 2012.....
Manchester United have more CL points than Liverpool have Premier League points......
Manchester United have won more Champions League Games in 6 weeks than Liverpool have won league games at Anfield in the whole of 2012.....
Manchester United have more CL points than Liverpool have Premier League points......
They all seem confident that things will turn around in January.
They always do
So, next year ?
No, this year. They are a decent striker away from finishing fourth(at the least). They just hope they don't drop too many points before January and the inevitable deliverance.
January is next year
Shit, so it is.
I mean they are still confident of doing well this season, as opposed to the 'next year is our year' motto.
That's some good slagging material right there
Another loss at Russia
KBRAP!
KBRAP!I wouldn't take any notice of last night given the team they had out. Wouldn't mind an upturn in form so they get something at Chelsea :jol:
If Liverpool do get Walcott and Zaha (which are rumours only I suppose) the. I think they will start to climb a bit.
If Liverpool do get Walcott and Zaha (which are rumours only I suppose) the. I think they will start to climb a bit.
Why would Walcott go to Liverpool? It would be a step down
Because if you can't trade up, trade sideways.
It's a big step down from Arsenal to Liverpool at the moment. He'll be guaranteed to play every week at Liverpool though and although I hate Walcott he will improve the Scouse significantly.
- Status