RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2012/2013)

Status
Not open for further replies.
also, it had been turned into a Liverpool vs United issue, apart from the fact that a London club will always get an easier ride from the "national" press...and of course, Liverpool's ridiculous response ensured a greater focus on that case.

Seriously... those T-Shirts. I still can't get my head around it. :wenger:
 
Teenage Kicks

The mighty reds, so hard to beat,
With the ball at our feet,
The opposition come and go,
Brendan's boys they score more goals.
We're gonna shoot we're gonna score and fight,
Rodger's team are gonna win tonight, oh yeah!


I... I don't even... whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
 
Now I'm seriously offended on behalf on one of the greatest tunes ever. The t-shirts are being printed as we speak. And it doesn't even scan. An abomination and a cultural crime of the highest order.
I wonder what John Peel, who loved that song, would have felt about that abomination of a rewrite from his fellow Kopites?
 
He's also got the Liver bird at the top of the stone.

news-graphics-2008-_655824a.jpg
 
feck's sake, I hate it when people cut off screenshots like that. What do we know about his world class?
 
Fergie's words always bring out the worst in Liverpool supporters. They hate him on a personal level it's just astounding.

Not RAWK but a user on a forum I know is on RAWK said:
While he should, and is doing everything in the interest of his club there are some rules of decency. You cannot go and jump all over the sideline pointing to your wristwatch when your team is holding the game, but then go and blast referees for when they don't give you additional time when your team is down. Being a "Sir" – he should know better.

While it is in the interest of your own team in both cases, it is hypocritical and disrespectful to the match officials and the other team.

Not extending the game for another minute is not "... an insult. It is ridiculous. It is denying you the proper chance to win the football match."

What makes you think, Alex, that your team would have won the game in another minute or two of added time? What makes you think that your team would not have conceded another goal, instead of scoring?

Is it disrespectful to Spurs by saying that they wouldn't have lasted another minute – sure is. Is it disrespectful to Spurs to say the United was denied to win because the referee did not give them enough time – sure is, implying that the Spurs win was less deserved because of that.

Alex, just rewind your clock to the last weekend and look at those points you took off Anfield. You may as well go and kiss the referee's feet for the rest of your life, so be nice to them.

While we all have great respect for SAF in what he has achieved, he is a complete prick of a person and this is one perfect example of why.

Their own manager went to the head of the referees and begged them for some decisions in the upcoming fixtures and had a massive whinge after the game at Anfield yet is heralded as a hero for speaking his mind and having the balls to take on the referees.

:wenger: fecking hell they are massively retarded fans.
 
Theyre ALWAYS in the league.

No matter how shit they seem. That win at our place last year will anger me for years to come. fecking hell. Ive never been so enraged at a game. thats 3 points theyve got on the board they truly should not have

But this tournemant I just dont see them keeping out The two big spanish teams and Bayenr as you say. Would heavily fancy Juve v them at the moment also. Theyve got very very lucky with their draw in the CL this year. Again

fecking bell-end. :lol::lol:

Almost talks sense then throws it all away.
 
We're a one man team again. According to Arsemania and RAWK.

Just like we were with RVN, and Ronaldo and Rooney...
 
Suarez "World Class"


lol. fecking idiots.
 
All I can think about when hes mentioned now is him going in with two feet on Shelvey. Im still absolutely fecking stunned

Mark Halsey I actually thought was decent aswell. i mean he was so proposterously pro united along with the two ridiculous decisions that its almost suspicious.

And agree with you on Evans aswell. One of a few over the years whove rode the waves and got medals way way above their ability

Ugh... :wenger:
 
Gerrard should be posting on RAWK

Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard knows time is running out for him to end his career-long search for a league title but remains hopeful it is not an impossible quest.

The 32-year-old is confident he will play on beyond the end of his current contract, which expires at the end of next season, but accepts factors are loaded against him to win the championship.

Gerrard said: "I'm not really one who looks back, I look forward, and I am never going to give up fighting for the title. But I'm realistic about where the team is at the moment and how much hard work and improvement needs to be done if we are to compete for it. Have I got the time on my side? No. Is it impossible? No."

He added: "I know I am good enough to play in a side to win the league and I know I am a good enough player to win the league but sometimes stuff is out of your control."

Gerrard has been at Liverpool since the age of nine and although he had offers to leave - twice turning down Chelsea - he has remained loyal to Liverpool, a decision for which he has been criticised.

"I have no regrets over the decisions I have made," said the England international at the launch of his new book My Liverpool Story.

"I am really happy I stayed. I am the captain of the club I love and this club means more to me than any other club out there.

Of course I'd love a Premier League winner's medal and that may have happened if I'd moved clubs but would that league title mean as much to me as the other trophies I've won here? No - fact."

Since Liverpool ran United so close in 2009 in the Premier League title race the club's fortunes have taken a significant dip, having finished seventh, sixth and eighth. That combined with the emergence of other clubs has made the Reds' task of regaining a top-four spot, never mind challenging for the title, even more difficult.

"It is no good us worrying about the power of Chelsea and Manchester City," said Gerrard. "But there is no two ways about it, if there was no Roman Abramovich (Chelsea owner) or the guy (Sheikh Mansour) who bought Manchester City I'd have two or three league titles sitting here now."

Press Association

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Starts off fair enough then somehow remembers he's a deluded scouser in the final paragraph.

I've seen a quote like this several times over the last few months or so, is it all the same quote or can't he stop going on about it every other week?
 
On one hand, well done to him for highlighting the problem of sugar daddy owners - I feel there should be more high profile figures at real clubs forever reminding everyone how hollow City and Chelsea's success has been.

On the other hand though - :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Gerrard should be posting on RAWK
"It is no good us worrying about the power of Chelsea and Manchester City," said Gerrard. "But there is no two ways about it, if there was no Roman Abramovich (Chelsea owner) or the guy (Sheikh Mansour) who bought Manchester City I'd have two or three league titles sitting here now."

:lol: :lol: :lol:

How does that work?

In the Mansour years they have been midtable :lol:

In the Mourinho years they always came behind by a long distance (5th and 3rd about 20 points behind) and there was the one time they were third very close behind us.

Maybe that season would have turned out differently, but how is that 2-3 league titles? :wenger:
 
He's trying to promote his new book. He's not going to say, "I've really screwed up my career by being stuck in a rut for the last few years." It's perhaps even financially foolish to say as much as he has; I think he's recognised that and tried to blame the sugar daddy clubs for Liverpool's lack of success rather than standards simply falling.

Unfortunately for Gerrard, the facts (anyone else notice his little Rafa-esque moment there?) don't stand up in his favour. Liverpool's best shot at the title in the last decade came in 2008/9, which was

- the year after Chelsea added £25 million on talent to a side who came the width of a post away from winning the Champions' League.

- the year after Sheikh Mansour bought Man City (and instantly Robinho). Liverpool finished 8 places and 36 points clear of them, a noticeable improvement on the 5 places and 25 points from the previous season.

Sugar daddies haven't done Liverpool much harm, mismanagement at every level (ownership, management and on-field playing) is what's turned them into a laughing stock. Until they stop trying to blame everyone else and take a long, hard look at their infrastructure, Gerrard will never realise his dream of captaining Liverpool to title glory.
 
If Mansour and Abramovich weren't around we'd have had at least 3 more titles. Arsenal might have gotten one but Liverpool surely not.
 
Liverpool wouldn't have gotten 2/3 league titles if Chelsea/Arsenal/Man City/United were owned by beggars picked randomly from the street, never mind Mansour and bloody Abramovic.
 
Good god, what a deluded bellend.

Its true though. This is what I've been trying to work out.. (ok not the 'we would have won trophies bit...)

Most Liverpool fans I know were happy to vicariously bask in City's glory last year when they won the title but it is this team who bought their CL spot. They had a massive hand in them not playing in Europe now and they support them..

It boggles my mind.
 
You guys aren't using your brain to the full RAWK potential, you see, if there was no sugar daddies twisting players arms with all that foul money.

The players would finally be free to follow their heart, to their boyhood club ... Liverpool, all the best players of city and Chelsea would have ended up with them, therefore Chelsea and cities league wins would be their league wins.

Though how any of those players get on the liverpool team is hard to tell, with them having the best 8 players in the league and all but still, they'd have one helluva bench I guess.
 
He added: "I know I am good enough to play in a side to win the league and I know I am a good enough player to win the league but sometimes stuff is out of your control."

Translation: I would have joined a team that could win the PL (Chelsea), but the death threats made me stay.

Considering how close he supposedly was to leaving Liverpool I don't give two fecks for his "the trophies I won at Liverpool means so much more than the ones I could've won elsewhere". No doubt that the scousers will love that bit though - proper club legend etc. etc.
 
If Ferguson wasn't a cheater and Wenger wasn't good at picking obscure French players, Gerrard would've won 20 PL medals by now.
 
Those Liverpool fans were more than ready for the Qataris to buy them up. I doubt Gerrard would be complaining about sugar daddies today.

He probably realizes he fecked up by backing away from the Chelsea transfer. That fluke CL win made him stick around (death threats probably had a helping hand) and created this monster that is Rafa.
 
I really never believed that death threats had anything to do with him not going to Chelsea. I really admire his loyalty. Still not like him though.
 
On one hand, well done to him for highlighting the problem of sugar daddy owners - I feel there should be more high profile figures at real clubs forever reminding everyone how hollow City and Chelsea's success has been.

On the other hand though - :lol: :lol: :lol:

I agree with this especially about the sugar daddies
Its funny to laugh at the 2-3 titles quote but I dont think its a crazy notion to think they might have nicked one a few years ago
/shrug :angel:
 
Why do they always have to blame someone else? Sugar daddies didnt cost you any league titles. Rafa losing the plot did that :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.