RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2012/2013)

Status
Not open for further replies.
With intent? fecking hell. It is just mind boggling.

Evans is running toward the sideline and Shelvey is coming on a direct path straight at him.
Ugh. It's absolutely ridiculous.

But hilarious :D
 
JohnLennonAirport.jpeg




Apologies if already posted :lol:

:lol::lol:
 
Apart from all the other nonsense in that post, former referee Jeff Winter simply isn't a credible 'witness'. As an example of his attitude regarding Sir Alex, I recall seeing Winter physically shove SAF off the field post-game, when one of Winter's decisions was questioned by the boss. Winter is thuggish, and a chancer.
 
That's it, I'm convinced. Why hasn't someone applied logic to this discussion before and enlightened us poor delusional fools.
 
LFC fans have a tendency to ignore inconvenient little facts like the refereeing decisions which actually cost us Premier League championships in the (very) recent past.
 
...and Oliver Stone.

Anyway, the trouble with conspiracy theories is that pretty much nothing can change the thinking of a person once he/she believes in a particular theory...even the actual truth.
 
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=298048.0

All scouser delusions concised and put into one post. Good for reference.


I love this crap.

What were the Cantona and Ferdinand's suspensions ... the LONGEST bans ever imposed by the FA... favoritism?

How about Rooney's suspension for SWEARING in the thick of a title race two seasons ago... favoritism?

Demba Ba's clear non-peno vs the Barcodes last season... favoritism?

How about the number of penalties we've ever won at Anfield?

I could go on and on, as I'm sure all of us on here could.
 
When asked to prove the conspiracy theory, Brentie responds....

Im a 31 year old living in Beirut with a job. To have hard evidence will require me to move to England and devote myself full time to this.

Absolute gold. :lol:

Get your tin foil hats on....
 
The Howard Webb thing annoys me. He has given Liverpool a penalty against us, sent off Vidic against Liverpool and also sent off Ronaldo against City. If he's supposed to be on our side then he's not doing a very good job of it.
 
The Howard Webb thing annoys me. He's give Liverpool a penalty against us, sent off Vidic against Liverpool and also sent off Ronaldo against City. If he's supposed to be on our side then he's not doing a very good job of it.

that one was mind boggling
 
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=298048.0

All scouser delusions concised and put into one post. Good for reference.

To be honest until he starts bashing United/Ferguson I actualy agree with him, corruption is always present nowadays, I too am of the kind that's unlikely to simply believe everything handed out infront of me without thinking for myself.

However he deliberately leaves out facts that would go against his claim that we're "cheaters", while only bothers to point out things that would support it.

I don't know how many or which games Howard Webb officiated, however, a sentence prior to him pointing out 18% of penalties Webb has given were to United, he also says the majority of United's 34 PL games after the City defeat have been officiated by him, doesn't that agrument sort of collapse on itself right there? It'd only be logical he'd have a higher percentage of penalties given to us than other teams if he's also officiated several more United games compared to other teams.
 
Nice to see the FA handing out their fair judgements again, as calling someone a "F*cking black c*nt" is a tad more tolerable than calling someone "Negerito" in his own native tongue. Well done the folks on the hill. Great call! ;)

AAaaaaaaaagghhhhhhhhhh
 
If they scousers read the report like they ALL claim to have, they'd see that the repetition of negro was the aggregating factor for the ban. If Terry had called him a black cnut 7 times he'd have got 8 games too.
 
Why? They have very evidence of him actually saying the word black you-know-what, while there's far more nuance to what Suarez actually said. If Suarez got 8, Big Man should have got at least 15.

Err no, they both used insulting racial terms. One repeatedly.

Both admitted saying it, both lied about the circumstances and got found out.
 
Does this mean no ref will give him the benefit of the doubt or is it just Suarez who gets no protection from referees.

Yeah. The reason Suarez gets "no protection" from the referees is because of the racism case and has absolutely nothing to do with him having a reputation for diving and other things.
 
That's really all too familiar these days.

terry-suarez-headlines.jpg


:lol::lol:

feck knows theyre a bunch of feckwits, but the difference in the way the media has been reporting the two incidents are wildly different, I dont blame them for being paranoid on this...journalists who tore into suarez are letting terry off very lightly indeed....I dont its cause one plays for liverpool and the other chelsea though...its cause one is an england international ( well was) and the other a foreigner.
 
Yeah, there is a certain amouont of irony in the reporting of the 2 stories
 
feck knows theyre a bunch of feckwits, but the difference in the way the media has been reporting the two incidents are wildly different, I dont blame them for being paranoid on this...journalists who tore into suarez are letting terry off very lightly indeed....I dont its cause one plays for liverpool and the other chelsea though...its cause one is an england international ( well was) and the other a foreigner.

Media racism?
 
I get that Liverpool fans are pissed, and I agree up to a certain extent, however when they start blaming us for this it turns pathetic. The reason Terry's getting off easy is because he's an England international, one that's very famous footballer-wise and it'd put a bad light on him and England, it's not because Suarez was being a dick to a United player, it's not even because it's Chelsea and not Liverpool, it's simply because one's English and the other one's from Uruguay.
I "hate" them both, but I do feel as if "justice" is yet to be done regarding this matter if you compare the 2 cases.
 
I think the shitstorm is less pronounced over Terry than it was over Suarez. Part of that is because of Liverpool fans' impetuous defence of Suarez on a wide scale making the issue more visible. They literally swamped phone-ins and all the ex-pros were defending him left, right and centre.

That, and the fact there are far less Chelsea fans on the planet to do the same for Terry.

There's also an element of bias still lingering around Terry at the top, it would seem.
 
I think the shitstorm is less pronounced over Terry than it was over Suarez. Part of that is because of Liverpool fans' impetuous defence of Suarez on a wide scale making the issue more visible. They literally swamped phone-ins and all the ex-pros were defending him left, right and centre.

That, and the fact there are far less Chelsea fans on the planet to do the same for Terry.

There's also an element of bias still lingering around Terry at the top, it would seem.

also, it had been turned into a Liverpool vs United issue, apart from the fact that a London club will always get an easier ride from the "national" press...and of course, Liverpool's ridiculous response ensured a greater focus on that case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.