Christ he refers to himself as WE, is that because he is fat enough to be two people?
RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2012/2013)
- Thread starter Plan M
- Start date
- Status
Christ he refers to himself as WE, is that because he is fat enough to be two people?
why is he referring to himself as 'we'?
This reminds me of when KK was hovering over the shoulder of Hodgson. Hopefully it goes just as well.
It's a common thing in Spanish. It's a way of avoiding the repetition of I smacking of egocentrism.
"Scum of the earth."Christ, we might as well be on RAWK.
you bell end.They aren't all bad. But there are definitely ones that try and use their position and their own agenda to try and publish one-sided bollocks to wind people up. The standard of journalism has taken a huge nosedive and I don't believe in 'you must look past the bullshit to see the great stuff' for me the bullshit just shouldn't be there in the first place.
They're just professionals paid to do their job, the readers are their employee, and they write what they think their readers want to hear.
Just think about that for a second.
They're just professionals paid to do their job, the readers are their employee, and they write what they think their readers want to hear.
Anyway this is supposed to be a laugh at RAWK thread it's getting a bit off topic now in a 'lets just generally talk about Liverpool' sense.
Fantastic:
Rafa thread locked.
is rawk un-lurkable now?
Seems i need to register to browse to have a laugh?
Seems i need to register to browse to have a laugh?
Most RAWK boards aren't available at this time, due to the Hillsborough Report being far more important than football chatter.
Is that why geordies use 'us' instead 'me'?
Wait they locked all the boards so they can talk about Hillsborough?
Yes mate, and understandably so (IMO). I read on there that the other boards might re-open this weekend.
I think its a ridiculous decision personally - but then so many of their mod decisions seem to fall under that umbrella.
There will be people on that forum that lost loved ones that day as well as others who survived the leppings lane death trap and have been riddled with guilt ever since as a result (obviously they shouldn't be but that's how the human mind works). The tragedy that occurred that day will be something that is of incredible importance to all Liverpool fans, and Liverpudlians in general, so I don't see why rawk deciding not to chat about formations or what have you is a bad thing at all. I think they've got this one spot on, if you ask me.
I don't see it as a good or bad thing, just a bit strange.
Why do you think it's strange?
I do fully empathise with Liverpool not wanting to discuss football trivialities (real word?) for the time being. What I don't get though is this http://www.bordgaisenergytheatre.ie/get-in-to-the-mind-of-rafa-benitez-champions-league-dreams.html surely he thinks fans will have more important things on their mind tonight than stroking his ego.
The more public information the better imo.
other liverpool forums i believe haven't done so like rawk has. Just had a look around just now.
They aren't all bad. But there are definitely ones that try and use their position and their own agenda to try and publish one-sided bollocks to wind people up. The standard of journalism has taken a huge nosedive and I don't believe in 'you must look past the bullshit to see the great stuff' for me the bullshit just shouldn't be there in the first place.
They're just professionals paid to do their job, the readers are their employee, and they write what they think their readers want to hear.
Just think about that for a second.
They're just professionals paid to do their job, the readers are their employee, and they write what they think their readers want to hear.
Anyway this is supposed to be a laugh at RAWK thread it's getting a bit off topic now in a 'lets just generally talk about Liverpool' sense.
^ Exactly, they're professional football columnist. They're paid to do their job, which they do it brilliantly, writting shits and bollocks the readers would want to read.
They're not CIA whistleblower, or the Warfront reporter that reports war atrocities, they're at best entertainment section columnist.
What more can you expect from them
I agree.
No gem after their defeat?
Rafa's doing a meet and greet with the LFC supporter though. LOL
that fsw's getting desperate eh?
Wish Brod give him one
Rafa's doing a meet and greet with the LFC supporter though. LOL
that fsw's getting desperate eh?
Wish Brod give him one
RAWK just got boring.
They didnt lose
It's not the end of the world for Liverpool unless you're a typical Pool fan with over the top expectations. They've had a tough schedule to start with and should have won today and against City but instead they're breaking records that they wouldn't want to break.
And long may that continue.
Wasn't it 1-1?
Two penalty claims yesterday. Minimal contact in both claims initiated by the attacking player. Both exaggerated dives.
Some quarters like to cry witch hunt with the party line: 'if that had been Suarez, the media would be going crazy'. Except it was Suarez and the media is focusing on Welbeck instead.
So, yeah... about that media-driven agenda.
Some quarters like to cry witch hunt with the party line: 'if that had been Suarez, the media would be going crazy'. Except it was Suarez and the media is focusing on Welbeck instead.
So, yeah... about that media-driven agenda.
Rooneys elbow, whilst forgetting about brave stevie g's forearm smash on Michael Brown, or the cowardly elbow on Welbeck, or suarez sly kick on parker, or pulling rafaels hair, or elbowing ivanovic. Agenda you say
What's to forget? It was a great moment for football fans everywhere.
It makes me laugh how indignant you lot still get about this. So wee little raffy had his lovely curls tugged a little. Who cares about those things. If Rafael did, he would be the biggest girly man on earth. He's got a forum army performing the role for him though, years after.
I dont care, but what about this agenda? Apparently it's only Rooney and welbeck who get away with elbows and dives.
youre missing the point. its generally brought up as a condemnation of suarez character. I doubt it affected the victim too much. but that he would pull another mans hair while that man had his back to him sums suarez up nicely. the act itself is the issue. and just one in a long list. petty and cowardly.
Meh. I don't buy the conspiracy. I think you do get more calls in your favour than we do, but I don't think there is any concerted conspiracy or corruption behind it.
And Suarez is definitely a dirty player, or at best carelessly clumsy. I actually think this part is worse than his diving, which tends to get way overplayed. He doesn't actually dive that much these days.
Adam, when he was still here, was much more cynical than Luis in that regard. But Chad is an old-fashioned hardworking Scot and Luis is a theatrical South American, so they get a different story spun for them.
I do think he dived for the penalty claim, but he probably didn't see it that way. Reckon most latin players think that as long as there is contact, they are justified in throwing themselves to the ground. There might have been, but not enough to cause that tumble.
Another player might have gotten the penalty and I think we are slowly moving towards a state of affairs where dives like that become seen as legitimately drawing the foul, but we shouldn't be. Contact doesn't and shouldn't automatically equate to "foul."
It's a tug of the hair. An utterly trivial act. Speaking of petty, there is some irony in your lot repeatedly bringing it up more than a year after it happened.
I don't think Rafael was too bothered. It's amusing to see how it still riles your lot. I hope he pulls it again next week.
Was biting an opponent trivial too? I've seen some nasty little footballers in my time but Suarez is by far the worst.
Obviously not, but I am not saying that, am I?
Aside from yesterday, of course
- Status