Daniel "The Poucher" Sturridge
He steals pouches? He's truly doing everything to blend in there! Five-finger salute, obligatory "best club in the world" remark and now robbing women.
Daniel "The Poucher" Sturridge
Jellies@RAWK said:I'm developing a serious mancrush on Hendo, though to be fair, I could fall in love with all our players after today. WHAT a performance!
Has the poetry & prose commenced?
Scary stuff on the hilarious Post Match thread:
Henderson must have the stupidest face of all time.
There is however an increasing concern about short termism and persistent pessimism from a few but vocal set of posters.
This may be due to the non stop demand for news from 24hr multi platform news sites, feeding off and analysing every little scrap and titbit, actually hyping seeming nonsense into the status of 'important news' as there isn't anything else to talk about.
Or it may be that some of the fan base has changed into those who don't get it.
I've deleted a couple of posts on here, because this isn't the thread to be perpetuating your own agenda and opinion, be it right or wrong, about the club.
That's up there with Stubbins' diving header in the snow and the full impact of the Liverpudlian communion in terms of sheer comedy gold.Ill leave a picture as its visually easier for people to comprehend.
I think that Daniel Sturridge is going to make a difference for them. It was a terrible decision to sell a young England international with a proven track record of goals in the PL to a rival for 12 million. Sturridge was never given a proper chance at Chelsea, despite outscoring Torres from wide right in his first ever season. He scored 8 goals in 12 PL games at an average Bolton side and I think will be a 20+ goal a season striker for Liverpool.
He is younger, quicker, more skillful, more powerful, a more lethal finisher and has better support play than Fernando Torres 2013 and we played Torres no matter how bad he was and how many games he hadn't scored for, cos he was told after Munich when he threw a strop that he would be the main man.
Sturridge was desperate to impress on the very few chances that he got and took to shooting from anywhere, he is selfish anyway but I think that added to it. Selfishness can be a good thing through the middle, ask Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. I (sadly) think that someone who attacks the space, gets into the box and shoots a lot is exactly what they need.
It pisses me off every time I see him score a goal for them.
I think that Daniel Sturridge is going to make a difference for them. It was a terrible decision to sell a young England international with a proven track record of goals in the PL to a rival for 12 million. Sturridge was never given a proper chance at Chelsea,
Wish I could still post on RAWK. Just saw a thread talking about our debt and how it's not going down. The amount of uninformed bollocks that gets talked about at United is incredible.
Had a feeling the Suarez-Sturridge partnership was going to work.
Wish I could still post on RAWK. Just saw a thread talking about our debt and how it's not going down. The amount of uninformed bollocks that gets talked about at United is incredible.
Wish I could still post on RAWK. Just saw a thread talking about our debt and how it's not going down. The amount of uninformed bollocks that gets talked about at United is incredible.
It's spoken by Manchester City fan though. The Manchester City fans are a lot more retarded than Liverpool fans. Still deluded that we're gonna implode under Glazers.
Our debt should be gone come 2016/17 or something like that if all goes to plan, right?
We're going off topic now, but yes, if all these super-sized sponsorship deals go towards paying off the debt, it'll be around 2017* by the time we're debt-free.
*It could even be earlier depending on our success on the pitch in the interim. For example, a Champions League win is worth approximately £100 million to the victorious team.
We're going off topic now, but yes, if all these super-sized sponsorship deals go towards paying off the debt, it'll be around 2017* by the time we're debt-free.
*It could even be earlier depending on our success on the pitch in the interim. For example, a Champions League win is worth approximately £100 million to the victorious team.
It's spoken by Manchester City fan though. The Manchester City fans are a lot more retarded than Liverpool fans. Still deluded that we're gonna implode under Glazers.
But offset by increased payouts to squads etc etc.
It's hard to tell when our club will be debt free. Indeed it's probably worth staying in debt somewhat.
What is certain however that we've gone through the worst of the Glazer owndership in regards to debt levels troubling our club. Our debt levels now are completely manageable. The missing PIK money should have hopefully been paid off with the share issue as well.
I think that Daniel Sturridge is going to make a difference for them. It was a terrible decision to sell a young England international with a proven track record of goals in the PL to a rival for 12 million. Sturridge was never given a proper chance at Chelsea, despite outscoring Torres from wide right in his first ever season. He scored 8 goals in 12 PL games at an average Bolton side and I think will be a 20+ goal a season striker for Liverpool.
He is younger, quicker, more skillful, more powerful, a more lethal finisher and has better support play than Fernando Torres 2013 and we played Torres no matter how bad he was and how many games he hadn't scored for, cos he was told after Munich when he threw a strop that he would be the main man.
Sturridge was desperate to impress on the very few chances that he got and took to shooting from anywhere, he is selfish anyway but I think that added to it. Selfishness can be a good thing through the middle, ask Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. I (sadly) think that someone who attacks the space, gets into the box and shoots a lot is exactly what they need.
It pisses me off every time I see him score a goal for them.
Have another go there, Rob.
Fourth time lucky?
From RAWK's Photoshop thread
Gap down to 21 points. It's onnnnnn.
I suppose we're a one man team then according to RAWK?
I'm with Big Papi. I fear that one day Liverpool will be good again. I just want them to die. Just go away and don't come back.
They don't have the financial resources or infastructure to compete. Their best hope will be if a rich Arab or an oligarch comes in, which could plausibly happen given their 'istree, although Moores was trying to hawk them round the Middle East when he sold them to Hicks and Gillette () to no avail.
I don't think they're a well enough run club to "do a Tottenham". Their scouting network seems pretty awful - although I fear Sturridge will come good for them, most of their signings seems to be overrated and overpriced British players.
Wish I could still post on RAWK. Just saw a thread talking about our debt and how it's not going down. The amount of uninformed bollocks that gets talked about at United is incredible.