RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2011/2012)

The conspiracy angle on this really surprises me. If the panel were all Ferguson's friends then why would they engineer a situation where Liverpool's most highly rated player misses games against Manchester City, and returns for a game against Manchester United? This ban isn't actually in United's interest.
 
kietotheworld said:
The conspiracy angle on this really surprises me. If the panel were all Ferguson's friends then why would they engineer a situation where Liverpool's most highly rated player misses games against Manchester City, and returns for a game against Manchester United? This ban isn't actually in United's interest.
Click to expand...

Also do they really think their beloved club wouldn't have vetoed on the penal if they believed that there was a chance of one of the panel being associated with Fergie.
 
Some prick on RAWK said:
Ferguson went out of his way to speak on TV saying "The boy Suarez was diving all over the place". The implication being that Suarez is a cheat and a liar of course, what with him being a foreigner and all.
Click to expand...
More like him having a history of diving
suarezzxo00.gif

suarezg6ujn.gif

suarezbeingsuarezmkvei.gif
 
I've read the RAWK thread and it's mindboggling how they continue to believe that Suarez is innocent and that the evil Patrice Evra made up racial allegations to tarnish his name and get him banned in some sort of Evra-Man Utd-FA conspiracy.

They believe that Evra is a liar despite Suarez changing his story to fit video evidence and generally talking bollocks when video evidence clearly showed his intentions were to annoy Evra. The people apparently on his side Kuyt, who was found to be lying about Evra saying he was booked because he was black, and Commolli both said Suarez said "because he was black" but apparently both misunderstood him in Spanish and Dutch respectively.

It's just utter retardation. I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt prior to all this but they are really a bunch of complete idiots.
 
anyone else find it slightly hypocritical for Evra to claim verbal racism and be so hurt and offended by it, yet he wares Nike boots (I presume for which he is sponsored to do so), a company with numerous associations with human rights violations in regards to forced/child labour in Asia.
Click to expand...


I'm not fussed.
I work in a garage with Poles and Asians and there at each other all day
One of my mates is black - English, and we were talking about this the other day and his thoughts were if someone calls him a black x in an argument he couldn't care less, he said he aint a slave, no one in his family was.
Click to expand...


I think we can all agree on that but in all honesty Blatter, as much as I don't really have time for him, wasn't all that wrong. Even when used in negative context racist words only have as much power as the person on the receiving end let's them. It's not as though either player tired to expell the other from the pitch because of their skin color or nationality or continent of birth. Adrenaline was flowing and heated things were said in the moment. It's something that can be resolved by a handshake or at the worst just not talking to that person. The best way to combat it in sports is play the person responsible off the park
Click to expand...


:wenger:
 
africanspur said:
anyone else find it slightly hypocritical for Evra to claim verbal racism and be so hurt and offended by it, yet he wares Nike boots (I presume for which he is sponsored to do so), a company with numerous associations with human rights violations in regards to forced/child labour in Asia.
Click to expand...

:wenger::wenger:

What in the absolute feck are you talking about? He wears nike boots so shouldn't be offended by racism?

Child labour and human rights abuse aren't racism.

EDIT: reading your whole post, seems you are being sarcastic, fair enough
 
Eugenius said:
:wenger::wenger:

What in the absolute feck are you talking about? He wears nike boots so shouldn't be offended by racism?

Child labour and human rights abuse aren't racism.

EDIT: reading your whole post, seems you are being sarcastic, fair enough
Click to expand...

I think he was quoting posts from RAWK.
 
africanspur said:
anyone else find it slightly hypocritical for Evra to claim verbal racism and be so hurt and offended by it, yet he wares Nike boots (I presume for which he is sponsored to do so), a company with numerous associations with human rights violations in regards to forced/child labour in Asia.


I'm not fussed.
I work in a garage with Poles and Asians and there at each other all day
One of my mates is black - English, and we were talking about this the other day and his thoughts were if someone calls him a black x in an argument he couldn't care less, he said he aint a slave, no one in his family was.


I think we can all agree on that but in all honesty Blatter, as much as I don't really have time for him, wasn't all that wrong. Even when used in negative context racist words only have as much power as the person on the receiving end let's them. It's not as though either player tired to expell the other from the pitch because of their skin color or nationality or continent of birth. Adrenaline was flowing and heated things were said in the moment. It's something that can be resolved by a handshake or at the worst just not talking to that person. The best way to combat it in sports is play the person responsible off the park


:wenger:
Click to expand...

Yep. All three are extracts from RAWK.
 
Eugenius said:
:wenger::wenger:

What in the absolute feck are you talking about? He wears nike boots so shouldn't be offended by racism?

Child labour and human rights abuse aren't racism.

EDIT: reading your whole post, seems you are being sarcastic, fair enough
Click to expand...

:lol::lol:
 
I think RAWK will find that Satan is performing favours for Fergie in the hopes that he'll manage their next onslaught on the Heavenly Domain.
 
United did play in their black jerseys, didn't they?
If the problem starts there, with suarez being competitive against all the black-clothed pricks, his " because your black" gets another meaning. Far fetched, I know.....
Click to expand...

Jesus wept.
 
I've tried to keep up with this thread, but every hour another 7000 pages are added! So my apologies if this has already been shown.

Credit to RedLFCBlood over on LFCREDS, here is video of Evra going down after contact with Suarez. Before you watch it, here are the FA's words:
In the 58th minute of the game, Mr Suarez fouled Mr Evra between the edge of the Manchester United penalty area and the corner flag at the Kop end. It seemed to us to be a deliberate foul, and the referee awarded a free kick. The foul was committed by Mr Suarez kicking Mr Evra on his right knee. Mr Evra explained that he had previously had a bad problem in that knee. He remained on the ground receiving medical treatment for about one minute after the tackle.


2nd point: Mr Evra said that while he was lying on the ground, Mr Kuyt came up to him and said "stand up, you fecking prick". Mr Kuyt said "This is untrue. What I did say was something to the effect of "Stand up, stand up", as if to say that it had been a foul but he was making too much of it". The video footage did not show Mr Kuyt speaking to Mr Evra at this time, but Mr Kuyt admitted that he did so.

Now watch the video starting at about 1:15. Suarez did not kick Evra deliberately, and Kuyt did say something to Evra. Both points are obvious on the video to even the most biased United apologist, yet the FA gets both points horrendously wrong. They had zero desire to get the facts right. They put their blinders on and set out to find whatever they could to convict Suarez, discounting any evidence that didn't fit their wishes.

It's a fecking witch hunt! :no


Click to expand...



What the feck ?
I just showed that to the Mrs, a manc, and asked her to explain what foul she saw take place .
She said, after viewing it four times says 'Perhaps he (LS) pulled at his arm'

I then showed her the FA report and she agrees its ridiculous to suggest it was a deliberate kick in the knee.
The same with Kuyt, in that he obviously says something.

feckin witch hunt.
I hope the club use that Video.
Click to expand...

:lol:
 
No wonder Suarez's defence was inadequate - obviously, he should have brought his missus to study the video evidence (cf 'The FA versus Maradona's Missus', 1986).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.