The problem here - and it should have been clear to the people who did this - is that you don't put young, raw players into such pressurised situations because the potential fallout can be ruinous to their development and cost them months, if not years, in recovery - both in terms of confidence and identity.
I have said (it to the point people might be sick of seeing it) that you always need a proper attacker to bear the majority of the goalscoring load and the pressures and pitfalls that come with it. Hojlund is and has regressed under the pressure and weight of expectation and is genuinely a worse player now than he was when he got here because of how we've handled him.
Perhaps Amorim works wonders and gets him up to par - as in a Manchester United calibre squaddie - but I see someone who should be on loan at a smaller club at best when he plays. He does too many things wrong, and the compound of that is someone who looks lost as one piece of poor play follows another and another and another. Even when he is on the ball, he doesn't really have a clue what to do with it or where to go once it's released. You can't help but notice his foibles because he looks so out of place with others in his own game, nevermind the competence or ability of those around him. The more you focus solely on him, the more problems come to light and that's really not where things should be with your lead the line striker who cost a small fortune.
It's going to be a very interesting season for Hojlund and the decision of what the club do with him, for his benefit as well as our own.