Andycoleno9
matchday malcontent
Yes.
He has 5 goals and zero assists in 16 games. First choice Man Utd striker.He's had maybe 2/3 poor games? At most, in a dysfunctional side at 20 years old?
If that is good season then.......
Yes.
He has 5 goals and zero assists in 16 games. First choice Man Utd striker.He's had maybe 2/3 poor games? At most, in a dysfunctional side at 20 years old?
He has 5 goals and zero assists in 16 games. First choice Man Utd striker.
If that is good season then.......
He has 5 goals and zero assists in 16 games. First choice Man Utd striker.
If that is good season then.......
We are talking here about his form, performances and impact this sesson, not his potential or talent.The stats don't tell the whole story in this case. If you have an eye for talent you could tell very early that he's going to be great.
Also, he's played the equivalent of 12 games if you count his minutes, had 2 goals disallowed and at one point the team didn't generate a single chance for him for more than 160 minutes in the league.
We are talking here about his form, performances and impact this sesson, not his potential or talent.
What is context here exactly? That he is talented and has potential to be top no9 in the future? Yes, he is. But do we need to look at his every performance based on that?Do you always talk about things with absolutely no context whatsoever?
What is context here exactly? That he is talented and has potential to be top no9 in the future? Yes, he is. But do we need to look at his every performance based on that?
And who was Rashford then? Rasmus is several times more efficient than Rashford this season
He’s been the biggest disappointment of all.
Funny that his performances have tanked after getting that huge juicy contract extension.
Not related but you crack on with the slagging off mate. I'd recommend going for a beer.
Are we not allowed to criticise his abysmal form now?
The stats tell as much story as is needed. Strikers are rated based on how many goals they score. That's how it's always worked. That's their primary job.The stats don't tell the whole story in this case. If you have an eye for talent you could tell very early that he's going to be great.
Also, he's played the equivalent of 12 games if you count his minutes, had 2 goals disallowed and at one point the team didn't generate a single chance for him for more than 160 minutes in the league.
EDIT: He's tall, strong, pacey, getting into really good positions be arrive at the end of chances and he has surprisingly good technique for a striker. He also seems to be up for the occasion every time we play a big game and didn't look intimidated at all vs Arsenal or Bayern's defenders when we played them. He has all the tools to be a world class poacher and it seems like his mentality is great too.
With context ofcourse you are. You are essentially suggesting he's on the take.
The stats tell as much story as is needed. Strikers are rated based on how many goals they score. That's how it's always worked. That's their primary job.
If Haaland had 5 goals this season - and none in the league - no one on here would be coming to his defence saying "ah but he had a couple ruled out for being offside". We'd be laughing at his shit form.
It is what it is. Doesn't mean he wont keep improving and one day be a top striker, but right now he's not a £70m forward ready to lead the line for United. Not that it's his fault. Ten Hag's disastrous recruitment has put us in this situation
He is Man Utd first choice striker. Not his fault that we planned badly but it is reality. So he is as such rated by his impact on the pitch. For strikers goals and assists are basically everything.Probably mate yeh.
And assists. It’s just as valuable as a goalThe stats tell as much story as is needed. Strikers are rated based on how many goals they score.
And yet Lukaku came to Utd in his prime and was worse than Hojland is now. I wouldn’t trade those players at all.And yet like another poster pointed out was doing much better at the same age range as Hoijlund has for Atalanta and us. Not saying Hoijlund won't come good but it's an interesting short term comparison.
The stats tell as much story as is needed. Strikers are rated based on how many goals they score. That's how it's always worked. That's their primary job.
If Haaland had 5 goals this season - and none in the league - no one on here would be coming to his defence saying "ah but he had a couple ruled out for being offside". We'd be laughing at his shit form.
It is what it is. Doesn't mean he wont keep improving and one day be a top striker, but right now he's not a £70m forward ready to lead the line for United. Not that it's his fault. Ten Hag's disastrous recruitment has put us in this situation
He's had maybe 2/3 poor games? At most, in a dysfunctional side at 20 years old?
Really? I remember he actually scored in the leagueAnd yet Lukaku came to Utd in his prime and was worse than Hojland is now. I wouldn’t trade those players at all.
Nah he hasn't. You're just saying that because he plays for us. If Arsenal had signed him for example I doubt you'd think the same.Yes.
Nah he hasn't. You're just saying that because he plays for us. If Arsenal had signed him for example I doubt you'd think the same.
Lukaku scored 16 league goals and 27 in total in his first season. In what way is that worse than Hojlund?And yet Lukaku came to Utd in his prime and was worse than Hojland is now. I wouldn’t trade those players at all.
Football is an entertainment and watching Lukaku is akin to having my balls rubbed with sandpaper. Fecking horrific footballer.Lukaku scored 16 league goals and 27 in total in his first season. In what way is that worse than Hojlund?
. This is illegal move.Really? I remember he actually scored in the league
Gets worse ever appearance. 72m down the drain. Just not mobile enough to play for a top team.
Gets worse ever appearance. 72m down the drain. Just not mobile enough to play for a top team.
Conpared to the like of Isak or even Nunez he is static as hell.What does that even mean?
Whilst this isn’t true to anyone with eyes, I do think he’s too bulky and therefore slow off the mark. Not sure he won any headers either which I assumed he’d be quite good at.Conpared to the like of Isak or even Nunez he is static as hell.