VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,404
He just doesn't seem to have any inventiveness in his play.
Funnily, I thought he was a little bit better today, though not by much.@Jev Now that was a crap performance!
Apart from work rate and "good lad" vibes, I'm struggling to see anything that he's above average at or where there's massive potential.
Funnily, I thought he was a little bit better today, though not by much.
@Jev Now that was a crap performance!
Better than the first match. But yes still bad and he is even beginning to worry me now.
Hardly.A standard Hojlund performance.
The only thing going for him? Some of the tripe you read on here.Bit crap isn’t he? I mean he’s young that’s about the only thing going for him but he’s miles off being a top striker
Hate to say it but he just doesn't offer much of a threat as a striker.
In no way, shape, or form should this kid be our main striker next season. He is backup quality at best.
I thought he was alright actually. Denmark also looked better with him around.
We did. He is struggling at the moment but he is by far Denmarks best number 9 at the moment.
He scored 7. Against Finland, Slovenia and Kazakhstan. Not bad but also nothing special. His inability to show presence in games is a problem. In these two games he was nowhere to seen.He also scored a shitload of goals in qualifying if I remember correctly.
People here put far too much emphasis on international tournament performances either way.
He scored 7. Against Finland, Slovenia and Kazakhstan. Not bad but also nothing special. His inability to show presence in games is a problem. In these two games he was nowhere to seen.
Also, apparently wanted Kane in the first place. How did that go? "Harry would've been perfect for us but is not available, so let's just get the complete opposite kind of player". It really is bizarre what we did last summer.He’s young. He’s allowed bad games. It is a worry how completely out of his depth he looks when he’s struggling. Just looks so easy to defend against. The other worry is the type of striker he is. We were crying out for a different option to Rashford. Someone who can hold the ball up and pose an aerial threat. But we seem to have signed someone who is awful with his back to goal, doesn’t win any headers and also wants to run in behind like Rashford. Our transfer strategy is so fecking haphazard.
We’ll keep on hearing until it’s fully accepted he is his own worst enemy.Was a decent game from him imo. Literally no one on the field created anything, so you can't say it's his fault he didn't magically score a goal or assisted.
Linked up better with his teammates today than against Slovenia where he seemed a bit late in decisions/movement/duels.
Overall a super boring game thanks to England with Mourinho as manager.
We’ll keep on hearing until it’s fully accepted he is his own worst enemy.
To this day I can’t see £70 million worth of talent there.
Because its not there.To this day I can’t see £70 million worth of talent there.
I feel similar. Mostly I think it’s his positioning. He rarely seems to be in the right spot. Clinical strikers like Lineker, Kane, etc all knew where the ball was going to be.I watched both games, and for the live of God, I can not understand how he doesn't get the ball more often, thus being unable to influence the game more.
Is it the team not passing to him early enough, or are the positioning he takes during the game? I truly can not tell.
I've watched football since 1999, but I really can not understand if it's his teammates or him.
I feel similar. Mostly I think it’s his positioning. He rarely seems to be in the right spot. Clinical strikers like Lineker, Kane, etc all knew where the ball was going to be.
I didn't get it.