Mike Smalling
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Messages
- 13,867
Any chance for translation please ?
Great, now they will blame Eriksen if Højlund flops.
Any chance for translation please ?
We did it when he was the best player in the squad. Surely we can do it again now he's the most useless one.Would be pretty harsh to take it off Martial twice.
I don't understand either. Played all games for Atalanta and came to medical. Fitness shouldn't be any issue. Only if he is injured.What's his injury status? i've read conflicting reports on him.
I don't know why and maybe its just new player giddiness but I got a strong feeling he will smash it. Theres just something about him.
I don't understand either. Played all games for Atalanta and came to medical. Fitness shouldn't be any issue. Only if he is injured.
Hopefully that will be managed properly if true.
Nope, we need him match ready nowCould his injury be a blessing in disguise?
I think he could benefit from coming in after the season has started without the press being on his ass from the first day of the season. They will be on to him, but maybe not as much. Really excited to see him play for us!
This is why we are still holding on to greenwood?Manage it better than they did with Rashford hopefully.
Dreading the thought of him playing whilst not fully fit and it affecting his performance. Media and social media are certainly putting the pressure on him to perform from the get go.
I don't know why and maybe its just new player giddiness but I got a strong feeling he will smash it. Theres just something about him.
Hopefully that will be managed properly if true.
Wish Martial’s stress fracture in the brain came with a hot spot as well
I remember Gundogan having some kind of back condition when City signed him, but he’s pretty much played 50 game seasons all the time he was there. Not necessarily the end of the world.
I do wonder if some of Hojlund’s condition has been somewhat embellished by United to take the heat off him when he does play.
Hopefully that will be managed properly if true.
Absolutely notNecessary?
It's impossible to tell how serious this can be with EPL workloads. Anybody who says otherwise is unrealistically optimistic.
But how the feck did he pass medical with this, and how did our disaster of a club manage to pay 70mil for a developmental 20yo with a potentially devastating injury problem? Inquiring minds want to know
Oh ffs just what we needed another injured striker.
So what we've signed another crocked striker??
Hopefully that will be managed properly if true.
How have you came to this conclusion?How the hell did his medical records leaked to the media? If true, he could easily miss half the season with this condition.
It’s great that we’re improving our depth in that crucial physio room positionLuckily Martial will be back for the opening games before he replaces him in the physio room
Let's not overreact now... I'll post what I posted in the other thread because people just go mad and ignore posts
He doesn’t have a ‘dodgy back’ what he has is a minor injury that, if not rested properly just like any other minor injury, can turn into a bigger problem for him and leave him sidelined longer than he should be
It just so happens this minor injury is on his back. What you’re all saying is akin to - wait he had his medical and he has a sprained ankle!? Wtf why did we pay so much I cant believe this i can’t believe he’s got a dodgy ankle, it’s Martial all over again, we've signed a crock’
If we worked him on a sprained ankle it would become a bigger injury, just as if we worked Hojlund to the bone now before he can heal properly it will turn into a worse injury. Case in point Rashford who had a similar problem, we should have let him rest and heal but we were desperate so instead we absolutely run him into the ground and he ended up with 2 stress fractures, even then he was only out for a few months after surgery and his back has been fine ever since.
It’s not a chronic injury problem and it’s not a worry, even the reports say not only did we do the medical but they shipped him to London for independent professional opinions first so come on give the club some credit, they don’t always make the best decisions but they’re not that stupid.
The Daily Mail article even contradicts itself throughout the whole thing, it tries to grab your attention and your clicks with buzz words and claims like ‘stress fractures’ ‘more serious than thought’ and ‘he wont play 2 matches in a row for months’ but then even admits at the end of the article they are basically blowing things way out of proportion
He’s never had any kind of injury history of note.
He doesn’t have a chronic back problem.
He isn’t injury prone.
Everyone needs to stop going on about how fecked we are and losing their heads over a Daily Mail article that cites “external sources” with no evidence or facts and listen to the club. They saw all the medical reports, both from inside and outside the club, medical professionals, realised that the issue is basically a non issue and, with every other minor injury, he just needs to rest up to let it heal, and still signed him because there is no permanent issue. The club are saying he just needs to train up, get match fit and don’t stress about the injury till it heals up, which means we won’t see him for a few weeks, he's in training today just as he was yesterday to get match fit. Latest reports suggest he will miss the first 3 matches.
Can we all just take a deep breath and chill please
Because we discovered that on medical. But we should have lowered our offer after medical. We payed huge amount of money for potential and then realised that he has also issues with his back. If you need second opinion about it then it is not for sure something "minor". Not to mention that we will be without him first 4 games.If had such an injury that meant he couldn't play pre season or at the start of the season, why did we show our hand so quick to pay over the odds for him?