luke511
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2013
- Messages
- 7,211
70 million that's already been paid for, in the form of Sancho, Elanga and Garnacho.How much would it cost to replace him?
70 million that's already been paid for, in the form of Sancho, Elanga and Garnacho.How much would it cost to replace him?
72m was the Sancho fee + the 350k a week on a 5 year, potentially 6 you're talking upwards of 100m on wages too. There's no way we let Rashford go and go into the new season with a front line of Sancho, Ronaldo (maybe) and Elanga, unless we're content with another year of fighting for top 6.70 million that's already been paid for, in the form of Sancho, Elanga and Garnacho.
I mean based on his current form, that's going to be our frontline next season irrespective of whether Rashford stays or goes. If he stays and continues to put on those stinker of performances, then he'll be continuing to warm the bench, albeit with a fatter paycheck.72m was the Sancho fee + the 350k a week on a 5 year, potentially 6 you're talking upwards of 100m on wages too. There's no way we let Rashford go and go into the new season with a front line of Sancho, Ronaldo (maybe) and Elanga, unless we're content with another year of fighting for top 6.
Slightly pedantic but okay, you get the point.. We would have Sancho, Elanga, Pellistri, Amad and Garnacho as options for the wing. Rashford sale could help fund a much needed CF, or even two if Ronaldo leaves. Rashford on current form combined with his awful work rate and constant PR drama isn't worth the hassle.72m was the Sancho fee + the 350k a week on a 5 year, potentially 6 you're talking upwards of 100m on wages too. There's no way we let Rashford go and go into the new season with a front line of Sancho, Ronaldo (maybe) and Elanga, unless we're content with another year of fighting for top 6.
Because that's what we do. We extended Smalling, Jones and many others for no apparent reasonWhy would we even want to open contract negotiations with Rashford and Shaw before the new manager is announced?
Because that's what we do. We extended Smalling, Jones and many others for no apparent reason
How much do you reckon Rashford would go for? As for the rest I'm sorry but it's more than likely 3 of the players you listed there won't see much game time never mind being 1st team players.Slightly pedantic but okay, you get the point.. We would have Sancho, Elanga, Pellistri, Amad and Garnacho as options for the wing. Rashford sale could help fund a much needed CF, or even two if Ronaldo leaves. Rashford on current form combined with his awful work rate and constant PR drama isn't worth the hassle.
Rashford is a Manchester lad. We are and will be his first choice.I can’t believe some of the shit being tossed Rashford’s way. It would be an absolute disgrace if we sold him to a rival like arsenal. You can’t ever make supporters happy. If we let him run down his contract, the club is incompetent for allowing that to happen. If we move to negotiate an extension for a player who has shown in the past could be very good and score us about 15 goals per season, we’re incompetent. If Ten Hag is truly the front runner, then let him coach Rashford out of this mess. Ten Hag has a proven track history of improving players who were deemed surplus or castaways by other clubs.
50/60 mil, that'll get us the much needed CF I'd like to think. Those 3 players have great potential, I'd rather us play Amad or Pellistri on the right wing (along with Sancho or Elanga) over Rashford, and having Sancho, Elanga and Garnacho as options on the left wing is more than adequate for next season.How much do you reckon Rashford would go for? As for the rest I'm sorry but it's more than likely 3 of the players you listed there won't see much game time never mind being 1st team players.
Rashford is a Manchester lad. We are and will be his first choice.
No one is going to pay Rashford more wages than what we are giving him now or in the new contract.
Rashford is on a 4+1 year contract. Trigger his extension and he has > 2 years left on his contract.
There is absolutely no reason to open a contract extension talk and give him a higher salary. We can get Ten Hag, see what happens and revisit Rashford extension one year from now. There is almost zero chance that he will say no.
Because that's what we do. We extended Smalling, Jones and many others for no apparent reason
What kind of magic is this? If Ten hag comes and we decide to sell him, it will be because he has fallen further on form. Which means we will not get any healthy fee if we sell him. And no one will pay his salary. So he will just stick around till end of his new contract, while earning 275k or way more pw.Worst case scenario; giving him a new contract at the very least ensures we get a healthy fee if selling him on becomes the only option.
What kind of magic is this? If Ten hag comes and we decide to sell him, it will be because he has fallen further on form. Which means we will not get any healthy fee if we sell him. And no one will pay his salary. So he will just stick around till end of his new contract, while earning 275k or way more pw.
Ok my bad then. I understood it as "in worst case scenario, we extend and get a healthy fee"That's like the worst case scenario, I guess
What bothers me is that the club has decided to extend his contract without consulting the new manager, same for Luke Shaw by all accounts. Would it not have made more sense to allow Ten Hag time to assess the squad's capabilities and decide for himself on who he wants to keep?
Well this is an British Club so maybe go support another club in another country if you cant stand the British core so much. PSG?
Absolute bell end and I hope you never become a proper member on this site.
I hate this hate people try to create by increasing a problem with the British players on our squad; acting like we never had success with them ever before.
Don't reply to me Jack'as*.
Might need 100 years to do that at current rate“Try to reach the club’s goalscoring record one day”
Well a pre-season is just a 4-week training session. If Rashford needs it so badly to resume form, then this international break already counts two weeks . He has lost his place in last two months so no need to prepare for starting each game. So just request the 1-month time to have special training session and back in form.
Or maybe just feck off for another excuse here ?
Bang on.
Hopefully, Ten Hag can get Rashford playing again. Worst case scenario; giving him a new contract at the very least ensures we get a healthy fee if selling him on becomes the only option.
Yes, worked brilliantly with Jones, Rojo, a certain goalkeeper etc etc etc.
The worst case scenario by giving him a new contract now is that he continues to perform the way he has for the past 15 months or so, and that there isn’t a single club in the world willing to sign him:
- for a decent fe
- on anywhere near his wages
And that we’ll quite simply be stuck with a player that is very well aware that he’ll never get close to earning similar amounts of money somewhere else, so he’ll stick around until he can bugger off for free.
That’s the worst case scenario.
they had a week off when ole was sacked aswellI don't get this pre season bullshit. Its 4 weeks like you said, he must have trained on things when he was coming back from injury.
There was a week off in January for the winter break and 2 weeks now. What does he want?
Watch when it comes to the summer, the headlines will say Rashford needs extra week of to recover then come pre season or whatever.
That's like the worst worst-case scenario, though. Clearly there are levels to this stuff.
Rashford will be out of contract the summer after next, meaning he'll go for free if the club chooses not to renew it. That's just bad business, I'm sure you'll agree. We may as well give him a new contract now and hope he turns his form around. Failing that, at least we'll have a bargaining chip when it comes to selling him on the following summer.
In any case, Rashford isn't the biggest concern for the club right now. For me, the priority this summer should be upgrading the long-neglected midfield. I cannot express how disappointed I'll be if we start next season with McFred in the midfield
I agree. We can begin talks now fine. But absolutely no need to agree on anything until we see how he does next season. If he's not able to make England's WC squad then we'll know he's not worth an increase in wages then.We can extend his contract until 2024, given his form the past 15 months i’m not entirely sure i see the point in handing him a long term contract extension, especially if it involves increasing his wages in any way. If he doesn’t improve by christmas, then we’re talking two years of not performing well enough. What do we do then? If there’s one thing we’ve proven without doubt, it’s that the contracts our players are on won’t be matched anywhere else. Expensive long term contracts given to players we can’t get rid of needs to be a thing of the past.
From my point of view, we still have two years before he can feck off on a free transfer, which is plenty of time for Rashford to show he actually deserves an extension. Until he does, we should consider the fact that he’s already on a contract that no one else is going to match
My thoughts as well. Give him up to the WC to see if he can recuperate his form. That will give him 3-4 months to fight for his United career and us 18 months if he doesn't look like he's going to and try and get something for him. Even if it's only a nominal fee it will send a message to the rest of the squad that no one is safe if they're not performing. I'd say a large percentage of our problems stem from our players coasting knowing it doesn't really matter how they play given that a lot of our players have been given new contracts without earning it or being past it.We can extend his contract until 2024, given his form the past 15 months i’m not entirely sure i see the point in handing him a long term contract extension, especially if it involves increasing his wages in any way. If he doesn’t improve by christmas, then we’re talking two years of not performing well enough. What do we do then? If there’s one thing we’ve proven without doubt, it’s that the contracts our players are on won’t be matched anywhere else. Expensive long term contracts given to players we can’t get rid of needs to be a thing of the past.
From my point of view, we still have two years before he can feck off on a free transfer, which is plenty of time for Rashford to show he actually deserves an extension. Until he does, we should consider the fact that he’s already on a contract that no one else is going to match