captain666
New Member
Why would we even want to open contract negotiations with Rashford and Shaw before the new manager is announced?
What a bizarre strawman. I personally don't remember Fellaini baselessly being compared to someone who has sexual assault/rape charges against him.
Any opinion of Rashford behind closed doors likely came from Carrick before he left, think he and Rooney were really close in their playing days.
Agreed. Both Bruno and Rashford with the extensions have plenty of time remaining. Things can be sorted out in the summer re: new contracts.If true, this is a ridiculous decision to extend Rashford's contract right now.
If true, this is a ridiculous decision to extend Rashford's contract right now.
In this very thread, unfortunately.didn't know Rashford is being compared to Greenwood who has these charges against him?
Can't believe the hate Rashford is getting on here. I firmly believe there is a good player in him and we've all seen glimpses of it. We've been horrendously managed thus far and it is no surprise most of our players are underperforming.
Whilst a long term contract for Rashford is pure silliness, he should be given a chance next season under new management.
Him being my namesake makes it difficult for me to say this. But if he does not start really focusing on his day job, I really don't want to see him at the club. He cannot say that his other activities have no effect until he actually gives them up for us and him to judge.
Shhh. They only defended the British core. You could see they trashed other players like Martial, Pogba, etc all the time. Hypocrisy at its best.where were you guys when Fellaini and others faced much more than what they are saying about Rashford?
like i said before he's having a poor season he just has to play his way back into form. there's no other way
work on his fitness, clear his head, make those opportunties count.
There is another way.
Get rid of him
It’s concerning not only how some fans didn’t (and evidently still don’t) see it but how nobody at the club saw the decline coming a mile off. He’s a really poor footballer - or least his football has been of an appalling standard - and has been for 14/18 months and yet until very, very recently he’d start any game he’d want to.
Why were they do slow to see what was obvious?
Shhh. They only defended the British core. You could see they trashed other players like Martial, Pogba, etc all the time. Hypocrisy at its best.
This summer?
Doubt that 's happening..
Oops did I hurt your feeling my princess ?Maybe cause they are all shite innit (jury still out for Sancho) ? Would mind a british core at all if they consist of Kane, Trent, Foden, etc but we ended up with the whiniest ungrateful bunch. And you still havent refuted my point when you defended the british core to death and shit talking other underperformers in the club. Example: if its Rashford it is always injuries, mental health, etc etc why not the same with PogbaWell this is an British Club so maybe go support another club in another country if you cant stand the British core so much. PSG?
Absolute bell end and I hope you never become a proper member on this site.
I hate this hate people try to create by increasing a problem with the British players on our squad; acting like we never had success with them ever before.
Don't reply to me Jack'as*.
I'm torn on this because on one hand he has been very poor for a while now and maybe a fresh start might do him good. But on the other hand if he can sort out whatever's going on there is a player who can be very useful to us. But surely the best thing to do is hold all contract talks until a new manager is appointed as the new manager might not fancy Rashford or Shaw. Either that or the candidates have been asked and they've given their approval, but if they haven't then what message does that send to the new manager that they've given new 4/5 year contracts to players they might not want.
Depending on Rashford's mindset giving him a new 4/5 year deal could either be a very good or very bad move. Good being giving him the deal could give him a boost showing the club believe in him and could motivate him to reward the faith shown in him and get his head straight. Bad being there's no motivation to improve knowing the club has no backbone to sell him regardless of how bad he plays. I hope he can sort it out but admittedly my patience is starting to wane and i think next season is make or break for me in weather or not he can recapture some of his form.
I guess you see what you want to see because, especially for Pogba there is always 100 reasons for his failings. You've probably picked the worst player to try and make your point.Oops did I hurt your feeling my princess ?Maybe cause they are all shite innit (jury still out for Sancho) ? Would mind a british core at all if they consist of Kane, Trent, Foden, etc but we ended up with the whiniest ungrateful bunch. And you still havent refuted my point when you defended the british core to death and shit talking other underperformers in the club. Example: if its Rashford it is always injuries, mental health, etc etc why not the same with Pogba
One could hazard a guess and argue that his debut came at a time when everybody in and around the club was desperately looking for a new hero. We had already gone through the Moyes debacle and it was starting to look that LvG would not be able to elevate the team to its previous heights. Rashford came on on that February Thursday night and he was a breath of fresh air, something to lift the hopes of a disheartened fanbase.
And, of course, Woodward and co. would not let the opportunity pass them by. After all, United are famous for their faith in their academy products. We were failing on the pitch and the high echelons at the club could not figure out why. But they could sell to the fans and to the rest of the world the face of a new era. Here's Marcus and he will lead us forward to new glories.
It doesn't help when the footballing people can't be heard or are non-existent in the club. Outside the United bubble, very few people could see MMM as a potent atracking trident that could spearhead the title hopes of any side in the toughest league in the world for a decade. Too many things lacking, talent wise. But here we were, being jolly and comparing Rashford to Mbappe and thinking Martial is some dribbling God.
The worst thing is the club believed the hype it had helped create. Now, we still don't know what's wrong, the fans have had enough of the owners and the players and some of the players believe that it's not their fault it's come to this. Overinflation due to lack of good judgement. And trust me they will keep feeding the bubble (new contracts) for as long as they can, because they know they can't deal with bursting it.
Who has at United? We're reportedly giving Sancho 350k a week, that's Salah and Mane salary rolled into one! You play for United, you get obscene wages the sooner people realise this the better and I don't think it's changing anytime soon. As sad as it is to say outside of this season Rashford has been arguably been one of are top performers for the last 2-3 seasons has he not?Rashford has never come close to justifying his current wages and hes not going to agree to take a pay cut is he? Quite what the logic was in giving him obscene wages based on future trajectory was I would love to know. No other club seems to do this. You get a salary that reflects your current level and perhaps a tiny bit for your immediate potential. If you kick on and improve massively then the club will probably want to increase your wages and get you to sign a new contract asap anyway even if your last one was only a year or two earlier.
I think you're being a tad harsh here. I'm British and I used to love when the majority of the squads we put out had a British core. I remember slating Arsenal for at times not putting out a single British player but that funnily enough came at a time when they were at their peak.Well this is an British Club so maybe go support another club in another country if you cant stand the British core so much. PSG?
Absolute bell end and I hope you never become a proper member on this site.
I hate this hate people try to create by increasing a problem with the British players on our squad; acting like we never had success with them ever before.
Don't reply to me Jack'as*.
I think you’re rewriting history a bit there. That front three scored more than the Liverpool front three, under what most now accept was a tactically poor manager. Challenging for titles for a decade with the same front three is literally unheard of, so yes, not many people could see that
100%. He simply cant understand that our british core suck dog bollox so far. I would not mind if we had Kane, Rice, Foden, Trent, Walker etc as our core as long as they perform well on the pitch. Anyhow british players always come with additional tax too so if they suck and stink the club we are in deep trouble offloading them. And United has a hard time parting with massive flop so far.I think you're being a tad harsh here. I'm British and I used to love when the majority of the squads we put out had a British core. I remember slating Arsenal for at times not putting out a single British player but that funnily enough came at a time when they were at their peak.
Would I love a British core? Of course I would but not to the extent of us falling further behind the pack. Supporting British players is a reasonable reaction but the question you should be asking yourself is can we do a lot better than Rashford (present form), Maquire, Shaw, AWB or McT. If your answer is yes then you're supporting them for the wrong reasons. Being British shouldn't give these players a free pass. Hopefully we can get back to having that core WHEN they're good enough but at this present moment in time I don't think they are.
It's a conundrum. British core fighting for top 6 or non British core fighting for titles? What would you prefer because right now we're not fighting for titles with the British core we have. We sign Rice (I know) and Kane then I'd be 100% behind it even if we have to pay through the nose because they are make a difference players but signing others just for the sake of signing British isn't the way to go if they're not good enough.
How much would it cost to replace him?Renewing Rashford means throwing at least 100 millions to the bin. This will be 2 times worse than the Rooneys extension in 2013.
How much would it cost to replace him?