Kaos
Full Member
Is it true that Turkey is buying a shit-load of oil from Daesh?
Well we know that the oil they comandeer and sell goes through Turkey, what happens after it gets there is anyone's guess.
Is it true that Turkey is buying a shit-load of oil from Daesh?
Erdogan did do business with ISIS .esp in in the first year
People will get more clear insights when they do realize that Erdogan and his party are Muslim brotherhood members. In fact, any major Islamic organization worldwide is a Brotherhood affiliate.
The US destroyed 280 Oil trucks yesterday in air strikers.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/is...-280-isis-oil-trucks-syrian-city-deir-n468126
someone is going to be short...
Now we just have to check the prices at the gas station and we will know who bought it.
Is it true that Turkey is buying a shit-load of oil from Daesh?
Is it true that Turkey is buying a shit-load of oil from Daesh?
Apologies if this has already been covered but did I just see a stationary Russian helicopter being destroyed by Syrian rebels?!
Apologies if this has already been covered but did I just see a stationary Russian helicopter being destroyed by Syrian rebels?!
This?
Weird edit though, couldn't have it been a continuous shot?
WW III starting from the Middle East?
It does that that sort of feel doesn't it.
Well I have zero absolutely zero sympathy for cowards who bombs children, women and elderly.
He is as ruthless as his captors.
It does that that sort of feel doesn't it.
Was watching the excellent documentry about WWI and how it all began. From my school days it was like it all started right after Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated. But it involved a lot of decisions by many different countries looking after their own interests.
Looks frighteningly similar.
Not just yet - but if and when we do - it's definitely going to stem from that region.WW III starting from the Middle East?
Yes, the WWI vibe definitely springs to mind here. There are too many countries and alliances with their beaks in this at the moment, which is why its critical negotiations take place to come up with a united front to resolve this, which will no doubt have to involve stabilizing both Iraq and Syria, as opposed to bombing anti-Assad rebels to keep Assad in power.
Turkey downs Russian jet for violating airspace
http://www.theguardian.com/world/li...urkish-planes-near-syrian-border-live-updates
Was watching the excellent documentry about WWI and how it all began. From my school days it was like it all started right after Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated. But it involved a lot of decisions by many different countries looking after their own interests.
Looks frighteningly similar.
Likely based on the Guns of August.
Then Obama needs to change sides because Putin wontindeed. Obama and Putin especially need to end up on the same side.
Then Obama needs to change sides because Putin wont
This?
Weird edit though, couldn't have it been a continuous shot?
Or rather we need a UN resolution agreed by all the great powers on how to proceed in Iraq and Syria. Once there's a UN mandate, everyone has a framework to work off of, as opposed to now where everyone is improvising based on their own interests.
Turkey believes the two pilots are still alive and is working to secure their release from Syrian rebels, a Turkish government official told Reuters news agency.
"Our units, who received the information that the two pilots were alive, are working to get them from opposition rebels safely," the official said.
Less likely than ever I thinkOr rather we need a UN resolution agreed by all the great powers on how to proceed in Iraq and Syria. Once there's a UN mandate, everyone has a framework to work off of, as opposed to now where everyone is improvising based on their own interests.
Would Obama not be better off just keeping his mouth shut or saying something noncommittal like the Germans have done?
By saying this, Putin is now forced into a reaction lest he look weak in response to the Americans.
Would Obama not be better off just keeping his mouth shut or saying something noncommittal like the Germans have done?
By saying this, Putin is now forced into a reaction lest he look weak in response to the Americans.
Asked about the downing of a Russian jet, President Obama said he was still getting the details. But he said "Turkey, like every country, has the right to defend its territory and its airspace".
He went on to say it was important for the Russians and Turks to talk to each other and take measure to "discourage escalation".
In a letter to the UN security council and Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Turkey's UN ambassador Halit Cevik said two planes approached Turkish airspace on Tuesday morning.
He said they were warned 10 times in five minutes to change direction.
"Following the violation, plane one left Turkish national airspace. Plane two was fired at while in Turkish national airspace by Turkish F-16s performing air combat patrolling in the area," Mr Cevik wrote in a letter, Reuters reports.
"Plane two crashed onto the Syria side of the Turkish-Syrian border," he said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the fighter jet was attacked when it was nearly a mile inside Syria and has warned of "serious consequences".
Would Obama not be better off just keeping his mouth shut or saying something noncommittal like the Germans have done?
"I do think this points to an ongoing problem with Russian operations (in Syria)," Mr Obama continued, "in the sense that they are operating very close to a Turkish border and they are going after moderate opposition."
"If Russia is directing its energies towards Daesh and Isil (Islamic State), some of those conflicts or potentials for mistakes or escalation are less likely to occur."