You make valid points, but they don’t refute my point: it was still a peaceful protest that prompted change. The degree to which the bus boycott specifically brought about change can be debated, sure, but that moment is nonetheless viewed as a pivotal, peaceful, and historic protest that sparked significant change. That’s really the intention of my comment: to dispute the suggestion that peaceful protest cannot bring about change. I’m not really sure you can argue that point, it is grounded in fact and supported by history.
To answer your question: Rosa Parks (as we’ve discussed), the push for Baltic independence, the suffrage march, and the farmers strikes in the mid 20th century are all examples of peaceful resistance that prompted significant change. A cursory google search reveals others, too.
I don’t actually want to wade into whether or not what is occurring right now (ie the riots) is necessary to prompt change. I really have no idea, but I sure hope that something meaningful can come from it. It’s a travesty that this problem has been unaddressed for so long, as you alluded to in an earlier post, but to say flatly that no meaningful change has occurred on the back of peaceful protest is untrue.