Protests following the killing of George Floyd

This is further complicated by the fact that the country is swimming in about 400m firearms (about half the global population of guns), at a time when there are disproportionate economic disparities the races. This creates a social powderkeg each time cops pull someone of another race over, and all of this is even before we get into bad cops/racist cops etc.

Who’d want to be a cop in any poor area of the USA where guns are the norm. Race doesn’t matter when it comes to pulling a weapon on a cop. I fully understand why the Police are on edge. Some of the are just cnuts and shouldn’t be in any of position of authority and should be weeded out of the force. But that will take time and support for whistle blowers.
 
For all the perceived danger is there a really big number of cops being killed by criminals?

From what i gather on pop culture killing cops is a big no no all over the world. Bad for business.

If I'm a cop what made me feel brave should be the reality of having the biggest baddest organization behind me, not how big my gun is.

Cop is like a mafia made men, everyone can kill em but nobody would and could getaway with it.
 
Who’d want to be a cop in any poor area of the USA where guns are the norm.
I do think there needs to be a dual approach - if people want a demilitarized police then it would seem logical that civilians should not be able to buy (practically) military weapons
that said if the school shootings have not been enough to convince the USA its necessary to disarm (as happened in the UK and Australia) then im not sure anything will and whilst people can buy AR15's its logical the police are going to have at least comparable firepower
Its a shit show basically and Im so glad i left the states years ago
 
I don't think I'll ever believe the US will give up their guns, irrespective of what the general public thinks or the Amendment states, or what murderous atrocities are committed with them. It is a multi-multi-billion dollar industry. That's the bottom line. Money > life is proven time and time again, so unless there is recompense, the status quo will remain.

If you think of how much money guns bring in to the coffers of a multitude of industries (the manufacture chains) directly, and the multitude of beneficiaries off the back of shootings (law, police, jails, hospitals, funeral parlours etc. etc.) and the government from the tax off all of the aforementioned, the notion of change is pleasant idealism with absolutely no grounds in reality.
 
Hughes has written some good articles over the past couple of years. Hard to believe he’s still only 24. The kid has a bright future ahead.



Coleman on the situation we're in regarding racism, police, etc. Listening to him one wouldn't belive him to be only 24.
Well worth a listen whatever "side" one takes on these matters
 
Johnson’s racial inequality commission written on ‘back of a fag packet’ says Lammy


Boris Johnson’s pledge to establish a cross-government commission on racial inequality is a “back of a fag packet” plan designed to “assuage the Black Lives Matter protest”, Labour has claimed.

Shadow justice secretary David Lammy said there have been several reviews into racism in the UK in recent years – and the announcement of another makes it feel like “we want figures, data – but we don’t want action”.

Johnson, writing in the Daily Telegraph, said the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities would look at “all aspects of inequality – in employment, in health outcomes, in academic and all other walks of life”.


And he told broadcasters: “What I really want to do as prime minister is change the narrative so we stop the sense of victimisation and discrimination.

“We stamp out racism and we start to have a real sense of expectation of success. That’s where I want to get to but it won’t be easy.”

The announcement follows two weeks of protests across the country by the Black Lives Matter movement following the killing in the US of George Floyd, who died as a white police officer knelt on his neck.

Lammy criticised the government for not providing details on the scope of the commission.

“I don’t know why he’s announced a commission behind a paywall, in the Telegraph, buried in the middle of yet another article about Churchill,” the Labour MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.


“If he was serious, why are there no details about how it will be staffed, its remit, its terms of reference, its timetable? That’s the question.

“It’s because this was written on the back of a fag packet yesterday to assuage the Black Lives Matter protest. Get on with the action, legislate, move – you’re in government, do something.”

Lammy said it is “deeply worrying” and “frankly immature” that Britain is still “having a conversation about whether racism actually exists”.

“And, frankly, when you watch a man die like we did in eight minutes and 46 seconds – I’d like to ask Boris Johnson why he thinks the way to commemorate his death is to announce yet another commission, and why he insists on talking about statues.”

Lammy claimed the Conservative Party wants a “culture war because they want to distract from the central issue”.




 
I don't like this general point. Delivery drivers don't fear for their life everytime they make a delivery. Cops in the US are probably always wondering if the perp is armed or not whatever the interaction.

Exactly. If the delivery driver deaths were mainly due to being shot by the people they’re delivering to I reckon we’d all find them a hell of a lot more suspicious and less friendly when we answer the door!
 
I'd advise both of you to read some opposing views. They are out there.
Here's two articles. They don't address all of the points you raise, but some at least.

Coleman Hughes from 2018
John McWhorter from 2016

Against my better judgement I did read these. The first one in particular.

He starts off with pointing out that lynchings have mostly been eliminated and that should be celebrated.

GDxejZr.jpg

He then looks at the disparities between African American descendants of slaves, and immigrant Africans from the Caribbean/Africa post Jim Crow, and uses that to imply the differences are due to culture. Let's ignore that most immigrants are the cream of the crop of their places of origin and pass that along to their children. Let's ignore that said recent immigrants, while still subject to overt racism, don't have do deal with the ongoing impact of 400 years of slavery and Jim Crow till today.

He throws in a comment about Obama telling black people to be better parents. Let's ignore that the president at the time stupidly made this comment at Morehouse University to a group of black men graduates, who were obviously doing something right up to that point. Let's also ignore the fact that actual data shows that a white man with no degree has a better chance of getting a job than a black man with a degree.

You know how the Republicans like to think their side of climate change denialism is intellectually equivalent to the other side that believes climate change is real and it is driven by human activity? You, and Coleman and John are Republicans. Nice try with the "both sides" trick though.
 
Guardian said:
The new government commission on racial inequalities is being set up by a No 10 adviser who has cast doubt on the existence of institutional racism and condemned previous inquiries for fostering a “culture of grievance”, it has emerged.
 
Lovely

He then looks at the disparities between African American descendants of slaves, and immigrant Africans from the Caribbean/Africa post Jim Crow, and uses that to imply the differences are due to culture. Let's ignore that most immigrants are the cream of the crop of their places of origin and pass that along to their children. Let's ignore that said recent immigrants, while still subject to overt racism, don't have do deal with the ongoing impact of 400 years of slavery and Jim Crow till today.
I'm a coward and it's late, so don't dare say much here. But, overt racism?

He throws in a comment about Obama telling black people to be better parents. Let's ignore that the president at the time stupidly made this comment at Morehouse University to a group of black men graduates, who were obviously doing something right up to that point. Let's also ignore the fact that actual data shows that a white man with no degree has a better chance of getting a job than a black man with a degree.
Is quit possible you're right about the last point there. I don't know. Got a link?

You know how the Republicans like to think their side of climate change denialism is intellectually equivalent to the other side that believes climate change is real and it is driven by human activity? You, and Coleman and John are Republicans. Nice try with the "both sides" trick though.
You dismissing me is fine. I'm in no way exceptional. Dismissing Coleman and McWhorter goes to show reason is out the window on this one. Btw, just saying "FU" would've saved you typing all that out
 
400? Half the global population of guns? That's insane. A population of 328 million. Just imagine being a lone cop walking up to some reported unrest, or car pulled over with high music blasting. I'd be scared out of my mind being a cop in the US.

Half the civilian guns in the hands of just 50 million Americans, and they live in poverty under a tyrannical government.

Ignoring that... rates of black gun ownership are low. White males are far more likely to own and carry a gun... but never seem to get dead as much.
 
You dismissing me is fine. I'm in no way exceptional. Dismissing Coleman and McWhorter goes to show reason is out the window on this one. Btw, just saying "FU" would've saved you typing all that out
Dismissing stuff from people you agree with means reason is out of the window, brilliant.
 

Yeah, pardon me for being non-plussed at the idea of black people not being lynched by white mobs anymore. Police still lynch, but I mean, you take what you can get right?

I'm a coward and it's late, so don't dare say much here. But, overt racism?

Don't be scared.

Yeah. As in, open racism.

Is quit possible you're right about the last point there. I don't know. Got a link?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/19/upshot/race-class-white-and-black-men.html

You dismissing me is fine. I'm in no way exceptional. Dismissing Coleman and McWhorter goes to show reason is out the window on this one. Btw, just saying "FU" would've saved you typing all that out

Nah I wanted to give you and John and Coleman the benefit of the doubt. It was wasted on them for sure but maybe you aren't beyond saving
 

Do the current government actually have anyone in their ranks who wouldn't be unsuitable? Reese Mogg probably only realised black people exist last weekend.

Although to be fair the first sentence can basically apply to anything this current government is supposed to do.
 
Half the civilian guns in the hands of just 50 million Americans, and they live in poverty under a tyrannical government.

Ignoring that... rates of black gun ownership are low. White males are far more likely to own and carry a gun... but never seem to get dead as much.

It's a crazy amount. Tyrannical, really? Belive you're right on the black/white gun ownership. Don't understand the last part.
 
Half the civilian guns in the hands of just 50 million Americans, and they live in poverty under a tyrannical government.

Ignoring that... rates of black gun ownership are low. White males are far more likely to own and carry a gun... but never seem to get dead as much.

I believe there is data that supports the notion that more whites Americans are killed in police interactions than blacks, but that's an overall number. My understanding is that on a per capita basis it swings negatively in favour of African Americans.
 
Yeah, pardon me for being non-plussed at the idea of black people not being lynched by white mobs anymore. Police still lynch, but I mean, you take what you can get right?



Don't be scared.

Yeah. As in, open racism.



https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/19/upshot/race-class-white-and-black-men.html



Nah I wanted to give you and John and Coleman the benefit of the doubt. It was wasted on them for sure but maybe you aren't beyond saving

That behind a paywall, right? Take a look tomorrow/another day
 
Rado is questioning the logic of reason being "out the window" just because someone dismisses two people you happen to agree with.

Ha, yeah. I misread RadoN it looks like. It was more the pseudo republican comparison that led to that remark
 
File under “failed to read the room”: one of the best college football players in the nation is boycotting the program because the Head Coach publicly supports OAN. The guy has a mullet, so I guess it’s not a surprise he’s tone deaf on this.

 
File under “failed to read the room”: one of the best college football players in the nation is boycotting the program because the Head Coach publicly supports OAN. The guy has a mullet, so I guess it’s not a surprise he’s tone deaf on this.


Can someone explain this?
 
That guy, Mike Grundy, who is a coach of Oklahoma State, was wearing a t-shirt with OAN (a far-right TV channel) on, and so one of the players Chuba Hubbard is "not doing anything" to do with the school because of it.
Is this not a bit over the top?

I mean he hasnt done anything wrong here has he?

He's insinuating he's Racist because kg the tv channel he watches?

Where do you draw the line?
 
Is this not a bit over the top?

I mean he hasnt done anything wrong here has he?

He's insinuating he's Racist because kg the tv channel he watches?

Where do you draw the line?
A host on OAN called BLM a criminal organization and is publicly embraced by Trump. By proxy, he is dismissing a major black rights movement. He should know better than to do that as a public figure and leader of dozens of young black men.
 
Is this not a bit over the top?

I mean he hasnt done anything wrong here has he?

He's insinuating he's Racist because kg the tv channel he watches?

Where do you draw the line?
It's not just a TV channel, it's a network that pushes ridiculous conspiracy theories and lies - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_America_News_Network

John Oliver did a video about it recently, but it's blocked so I can't watch it. It might be available to you though



Edit:

H3v1ZTu.jpg
 
I didn't say it's the law. I said you should comply. You don't know what information the cop has. You may know you're innocent. The cop don't. There's at least one gun in this interaction. I didn't say the police should detain you for no reason or suspicion of a crime. I am saying the opposite.
So everyone should comply with a tax-payer funded police officer giving illegal orders, thereby normalizing an illegal behavior? This is absurd reasoning and plain wrong.

My logic may be inane. How do you propose an armed cop, in the US, with the amount of crime and firearms in play, should approach a potentially dangerous interaction? I don't understand what you're trying to say here, the 17% unarmed killed by police were all unjust? If you claim systemic racism, you should be able to back it up. By actual data points. You claim there's plenty. Shouldn't be hard to provide.
Maybe the same way they approach dangerous situations in affluent neighborhoods? Secondly, I literally pointed you to the most comprehensive literature on the subject. It's your decision to read it or not.

I agree. One should have evidence to support ones argument. One should use relevant data, analyse it and reason from that.
Again see the above. If you asking for a surface level blog post or youtube video I can't help you b/c that isn't normally where I get my sources from. I wish I had the time to pull up all of the sources in the books I've read but I don't. But I pointed you in the right direction if you actually care enough.

Alexander seem somewhat biased, can't say much about Stevenson. I'm sure there are many examples of injustice. The conclusion from that won't necessarily be systemic racism.
Seems somewhat biased? Because you may not agree with her politics? Look at her credentials and actually read her book. I'm not even sure what points you are trying to make without even reading the literature. Mindboggling the lengths people go to hold on to preconceived beliefs.
 
Is this not a bit over the top?

I mean he hasnt done anything wrong here has he?

He's insinuating he's Racist because kg the tv channel he watches?

Where do you draw the line?


It's not over the top at all. He is directly involved with many black kids yet he chooses to wear that t.shirt . It's dumb beyond words . I think someone will be losing his job fairly soon