Even if it isn't a handball for a penalty (which it is) isn't it a handball in the build-up to the goal? Or had enough arbitrary time passed?
Also, why was Salahs not checked for offside?
Also, why was Salahs not checked for offside?
Premier League Gameweek 12
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
Estaben Cambiasso
City won't lose this.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, fella.
when you consider how long it took yesterday to rule off Sheffield United's goal against Tottenham yesterday
City way too open at the back.
Because rules are different for Pool.
i must be in the minority. Fairly sure that Salah was played on by the City dude in the foreground (De Bruyne?).
Totally offside that tbh.
People need to stop being biased. Bernardo Silva's hand hit it first. You cannot generate a penalty from an attacking handball by new rules. So you cannot cancel Fabinho's goal.
What's with the constant booing ? You'd think the game is played in some shithole city and not in ... nevermind.
I actually stopped watching last season. I’ve only seen their games vs. us. I hate to sound like a stuck record but it’s obvious there’s some instructions or at best a mutual obsession by refs to have them finally win a title. I figure why watch something so blatantly dirty?
Unlucky!
Fabinho is going to get away with murders today, that was a definite pull back in built up
He won't though. Teams have a tendency to run it's course.
Cheers! Almost scored there.
That guy does not look like his name's Angelino.
City getting no luck
In fairness, they were on the bum end of 2 VAR decisions at our ground, but today's have a whiff about them
You mean Bitter?
Are you calling me or City fans bitter? Or both?
You'd be right in both cases, to be honest
City’s entire gameplan seems to consist of never going behind and hoping no-one notices your terrible defence
Cause they are getting battered
what i don't understand is how quick the VAR check was
Stones may be playing him on but when you know how long it takes them to check every other offside it’s remarkable how little delay there was for that goal. Or how we haven’t been shown it.
Angelino looks like a common thug from Narcos
Stones offside not even replayed either.
Weird thing about that goal is it didn't look offside at all when the play was going on. Only when you took the picture and check it out, but then that's the role of VAR.
Liverpool are better.
But you can't really ignore the impact of having the refs on your side. If they can even choose to ignore to use the technology, then what's the point? I mean, instead of 1-0 they should've had a penalty against them, and then they just say 'nah feck it we're not looking at a potential offside' after spending five minutes yesterday ruling out a goal for Sheffield United because one angle showed a bloke's big toe being offside.
I mean, they play good football but they're not the only team doing that. The referees are massively stacking everything in their direction. Had City scored to make it 1-0 from the spot then we'd have been talking about how well City started and how they made their early dominance count and how they shocked Liverpool at the kop. Enter the refs.
His knee looks offside to me, and since he can score with it, it should be offside.
If its a handball by silva, advantage is over when it hits TAA and should be a liverpool fk in their box. Either way play has to stop
By more than 3 goals....
City have absolutely zero composure when they're under pressure.
Angelino was quite good for PSV last year, but how the feck did he manage to get un City's first 11?
How for the love of God is that rat-faced cnut Oliver still a referee is beyond me...
There is no way Liverpool don't win the league this season. I've come to terms with it. The sooner Clop fecks off the better.
Angie is getting a few decent balls into the box. Doesn't look too bad really.