I'm surprised nobody has done a 'Jones Signs' thread yet...
Because that shit would get you banned/infracted.
Phil Jones to United | Transfer to Champions complete
- Thread starter mubarak
- Start date
- Status
Because that shit would get you banned/infracted.
PhilJones was probably taken. By either a fake account or the thousands of other Phillip Jones' that exist
My first attempt at an alternative nick was PhilJones92, and a quick search seems to say that that user name is not taken.PhilJones was probably taken. By either a fake account or the thousands of other Phillip Jones' that exist
Edit: Never mind, I don't know how to use the search function.
Edit 2: It was obviously already taken, but come on, a little more imagination than resorting to leetspeak IMO. At least if you want to be perceived as someone who 'can spell'.
This is dragging out. Get it sorted United....sharpish.
Or else what?
Does anyone else think that the signing of this kid might mean Evans becoming left back competition for Evra?
Even out of form Evra is better than Evans at lb. And Fabio may well be better than both. I mean its an option but I dont really think he'd be "competition" just backup
I hope he is deployed in midfield too, I can see him as being our next hardman which we really need
It's sorted apart from an official announcement. Don't be suprised if they announce both Jones & Young have signed tomorrow.
If Evans stays he'll definitely be competing for the LB spot. Hopefully Evra gets his shit back together and holds on to his place on merit.
That would be a great way to end the week!
Evans will transition into a less versatile O'Shea, able to break into the team for long spells when other players are injured.
No "or else", just a straight instruction.
Course I could always smack em around the head with a frying pan...
JohnBrewinESPN John Brewin
Phil Jones #mufc deal has hit a snag, we understand. #brfc value him at £25m despite clause being triggered at £16m. See him as Terry/Adams.
Don't really want to post this but.. Hmm..
Phil Jones #mufc deal has hit a snag, we understand. #brfc value him at £25m despite clause being triggered at £16m. See him as Terry/Adams.
Don't really want to post this but.. Hmm..
They can do feck all can they not? There'd be no point of those types of clauses if teams could reject them.
Bullshit?
The clause means it doesnt matter what they value him at. Thats the entire purpose of the clause. As long as Jones wants to move, tough luck
If there is a clause there is feck all they can do about it even if they value him at 200 million.
Journalists are spastics.
Hitler sunk the titanic
That's either the laziest piece of journalism I've ever seen, or it's the stupidest thing from a club that I've ever seen.
If it's even true, that means that the only alternative for Blackburn would be to somehow get Jones to agree to a new contract without the release clause. Fat chance of that happening if he's completed his medical with us already.
If it's even true, that means that the only alternative for Blackburn would be to somehow get Jones to agree to a new contract without the release clause. Fat chance of that happening if he's completed his medical with us already.
Sorry Sults.
To make up for it, here's Kuyt with some Brazilian hookers
Los jugadores de Holanda, de fiesta en Río antes de jugar con Brasil – PlayFútbol
To make up for it, here's Kuyt with some Brazilian hookers
Los jugadores de Holanda, de fiesta en Río antes de jugar con Brasil – PlayFútbol
This has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. If that is accepted, it would rather kill the whole release clause rule. 'You can talk to clubs if they meet it, but it doesn't mean we have to sell you for it.
But, then, the Blackburn owners are daft enough to think that.
But, then, the Blackburn owners are daft enough to think that.
probably some desperate RAWk fans.
a buyout clause is a clause, please refer to Figo from barca to madrid, equivalent of iniesta going to madrid, caused an uproar, but happened nonethless
How can a release clause be in place that will only allow you to speak to the player and agree terms?
We can do that to our players
"Yes Mourinho, Chicha's release clause is 30m, but you can only have a chat with him, you will have to pay 55m really"
We can do that to our players
"Yes Mourinho, Chicha's release clause is 30m, but you can only have a chat with him, you will have to pay 55m really"
Oh, we'll feel like such mugs when we realise we paid £16m for being allowed to talk to him. Darn Blackburn, the cunning bastards.
What a croc of shit, never heard of such a laughable 'clause' probably another rumour to put alongside that laughable attempt at claiming hed failed the medical yesterday.
Ignore it.
Ignore it.
Soccernet is shit, they report rumours from Goal.com as fact
However, if this turns out to be true, I just might kill somebody
However, if this turns out to be true, I just might kill somebody
Laughable story.
Venkys...Of course its not true, is that kind of thing even legal for a start? how can you write a release clause into someone's contract and yet be able to demand more when its met? it makes no sense and is utterly laughable.
you put fabregas in the wrong thread.
There's a fair few wums on that Twitter thing.
Leave their twittering in the Twitter thread.
Leave their twittering in the Twitter thread.
That's why I would kill someone, because its just so ridiculous
The more pictures I see of Jones the uglier he gets.
If there's any truth to this story at all, I think Blackburn is just trying to drag out the matter, hopefully prompting us to pay a bit more just to speed up the transfer.
If we choose to see this through, I think we (or rather Jones) will most likely win the case against Blackburn. But they will make it as slow and painful as possible.
If we choose to see this through, I think we (or rather Jones) will most likely win the case against Blackburn. But they will make it as slow and painful as possible.
- Status