VanGaalEra
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13,270
I really didn't know that, that's quite incredible.
Goals is what we need and I'm hoping Pedro/Depay/Mata can get 10 each this season at least.
Do Not Want. Please Woody, dont sign him. Go for the best (Bale) or just dont buy anyone. We got Pereira and Lingard.
Just ridiculous isn't it? He's a very, very good player and people are still throwing the toys out of the pram.Do you realize how spoilt you are? Getting Pedro for £22M is incredible piece of business. He may not be as flashy as Bale but he sure as hell is a quality attacking player. Integral part of two of the best teams ever witnessed, Barca and Spain. He just turned 28, which means we can get four good years out of him.
Do you realize how spoilt you are? Getting Pedro for £22M is incredible piece of business. He may not be as flashy as Bale but he sure as hell is a quality attacking player. Integral part of two of the best teams ever witnessed, Barca and Spain. He just turned 28, which means we can get four good years out of him.
Bale doesnt want to come, Pereira and Lingard are no where near the level of Pedro yet.Do Not Want. Please Woody, dont sign him. Go for the best (Bale) or just dont buy anyone. We got Pereira and Lingard.
Agreed.Bale doesnt want to come, Pereira and Lingard are no where near the level of Pedro yet.
If we sign pedro then for once i agree with roy keane & believe we have lost our way. Not forever though because van gaal will build for the future.
Pedro is a fantastic player; it's just i'd like to think that we could do things differently to the way the likes of chelsea & city do things.
Even signing bale for 100 mil means more to united as a club than signing pedro.
The Di maria saga proves it.
Honestly have no idea what you mean. How does signing Bale for 100 mil mean more to United as a club? Are you going along the stupid Barca reject line? Because so were Fabregas and Sanchez, and so were Robben and Sneijder at Madrid. Those ended badly for their clubs didn't it?If we sign pedro then for once i agree with roy keane & believe we have lost our way. Not forever though because van gaal will build for the future.
Pedro is a fantastic player; it's just i'd like to think that we could do things differently to the way the likes of chelsea & city do things.
Even signing bale for 100 mil means more to united as a club than signing pedro.
The Di maria saga proves it.
Not sure how signing Pedro for less than 25m is comparable to di Maria's signing for more than twice as much. Pedro would be a typical United signing like Schneiderlin. Someone who isn't necessarily enough appreciated, yet still a very good player in his position.
Honestly have no idea what you mean. How does signing Bale for 100 mil mean more to United as a club? Are you going along the stupid Barca reject line? Because so were Fabregas and Sanchez, and so were Robben and Sneijder at Madrid. Those ended badly for their clubs didn't it?
The reality is that Pedro has 3 of the best 4 players in the world ahead of him. Bale wouldn't get a look in at barca and would be worse then Pedro because he isn't as good technically or as good of a team player as Pedro is. So there you go.
I really didn't know that, that's quite incredible.
Goals is what we need and I'm hoping Pedro/Depay/Mata can get 10 each this season at least.
The theory sounds good but today the elite teams can not afford the academy players in a prominent role , even Barcelona is being more cautious now. With that age Januzaj and Pereira should go on loan.Theres winning no matter what & then theres winning with a purpose.
You look at arsenal these days & yes, they do have players like sanchez & ozil but they have players like chamberlain, walcott, chambers, wilshere, ramsey and our very own welbeck.
Pedro is a fine player; i admitted it first but signing him is only a quick step to glory.
Not only would we block the entrance for players like januzaj, peireira & wilson, it's just against alot of the ethics of our club to sign players as soon as someone starts struggling at barcelona or madrid.
Do you not see how that makes 'the biggest club in the world' look?
We needed it last season with us dropping out the CL; IMO thats why we are open to selling di maria almost instantly. However, what we need now is to find back what made us, us.
Players like Stones or Bale shouldn't really be moving to the likes of Chelsea or Madrid over us.
Good point. At the risk of oversimplifying matters, it is worth noting that Barcelona seemingly preferred to sell Sanchez rather than Pedro. Further, I think it's clear that they don't want to lose Pedro now. There's a reason for that! Of course, it's not certain that Pedro will have the same impact in England that Sanchez has had, but he certainly has the potential to.A pacey, skilful, good finisher, hungry for first team football, works very hard for the team, experienced and performed at the highest level.... as well as that it seems he is eager to come
What is not to like? Will be a great signing if we pull it off - Sanchez was in the same boat last Summer
I think Pedro will be a much better success as he seems to be the player for Van Gaal's liking, working hard for the team on either flank which is HIS POSITION.I`ll not be one to judge quickly if Pedro will be a good signing or not. He is a quality player but he has played with the best players in the world for years. Will he be able to adapt to our team and the league is a whole another universe by itself.
While Pedro is not Messi/Bale/Ronaldo/Neymar level, we saw last year that signing a "galactico" player is not a guaranteed recipe for success. We signed Di Maria who instead of becoming our star player turned out to be an intergalactic pussy that never wanted to play here or was too afraid to fight for his place in a new team or league or both.
Pedro will certainly bring quality. For the fee that is reported we should sign him.
I think Pedro will be a much better success as he seems to be the player for Van Gaal's liking, working hard for the team on either flank which is HIS POSITION.
DiMaria was never consistent from the wing. If he was played in the middle more, could have been a different story but there was Mr. Fellaini who was preffered. Sad from diMaria he couldnt put in a bit of fight to bench Smashley who is after all not Neymar.
Di maria had pleanty of chances in the middle. For some reason, he thought he was able to be some superstar at old trafford and try tricks and dribbles that were far from necessary; especially in a formation like ours.
This probably had something to do with the freedrom that spanish teams allow when they face up against madrid & barca. Hopefully pedro wont be the same; if he does come.
I would hate it if we were in complete avoidance of bale though. A front 3 of memphis, rooney, bale is as close as you're going to get to an un- accomplished best, law, charlton.
If we get him, there's no room for our youngsters. Couldnt he at least take Young's spot? Then again Young just reupped so I have no idea ehat to think. Feels like our club is playing football manager...
I think we're just waiting for the di Maria deal to go through officially before signing Pedro, I think everything's in place for a quick process.So is this deal done or what?
If we get him, there's no room for our youngsters. Couldnt he at least take Young's spot? Then again Young just reupped so I have no idea ehat to think. Feels like our club is playing football manager...
I like the tradition of our club promoting from within, but this is once again the opposite of it.
Does Pedro really give a shit about winning trophies with us? Did Di Maria or Falcao?
The part in bold is idealistic and romantic. As for the underlined: Pedro would love to win the premier league with United and play a leading role in that.If we get him, there's no room for our youngsters. Couldnt he at least take Young's spot? Then again Young just reupped so I have no idea ehat to think. Feels like our club is playing football manager...
I like the tradition of our club promoting from within, but this is once again the opposite of it.
Does Pedro really give a shit about winning trophies with us? Did Di Maria or Falcao?
Pedro hasn't played a leading role in anything. He is a very good player who could play and do well in a system. Never has been and never will be a player that takes you up a level.
Still good signing for a team that finished 4th last season. At a decent price, too.
He would improve us considerably, in my opinion. Not quite sure what the level is you speak of, but we would be better.
Seems as though some people are annoyed that he isn't Messi or Ronaldo.