Di Maria is a recent example of why.
If you've ever managed a team, you'll know that personality is a big part of the equation.
so every footballer is just like Di Maria. Ok
Di Maria is a recent example of why.
If you've ever managed a team, you'll know that personality is a big part of the equation.
Di Maria probably wouldve worked out fine if Mourinho was manager when he came, or anyone not named Van Gaal (or Moyes, cause he was shite for everyone).Di Maria is a recent example of why.
If you've ever managed a team, you'll know that personality is a big part of the equation.
Can everyone in Manchester agree not to rob this guy's house if he comes? Thanks.
There are loads more.2 players out of hundreds, even thousands.
Not everyone is a Di Maria or Robinho.
Some are. If you're clever about assessing the situation, you can spot the pattern and avoid repeating the mistake.so every footballer is just like Di Maria. Ok
They didn’t get rid of Allegri. He walked away.yeh but if they are trying to go all out and win the CL why do they feel they will stand a better chance with Sarri over Allegri. It doesnt make much sense to me. Yes you can fluke a CL win like RDM did but if thats the case why change the manager. May aswell try and fluke it with allegri.
Some are. If you're clever about assessing the situation, you can spot the pattern and avoid repeating the mistake.
There are loads more.
What they have in common is that they were both told they were surplus to requirements at clubs they wanted to stay at. Then they were railroaded into a club that they didn't necessarily want to join, because that club offered to pay big wages to sweeten an unwelcome deal. Then they proceeded to play with the same amount of effort that a lazy teenager puts into flipping burgers at McDonalds after his mum forced him to take a job.
That's the paradigm I'm bringing up, because there are reports suggesting the same pattern is being followed by Dybala.
There are loads more.
What they have in common is that they were both told they were surplus to requirements at clubs they wanted to stay at. Then they were railroaded into a club that they didn't necessarily want to join, because that club offered to pay big wages to sweeten an unwelcome deal. Then they proceeded to play with the same amount of effort that a lazy teenager puts into flipping burgers at McDonalds after his mum forced him to take a job.
That's the paradigm I'm bringing up, because there are reports suggesting the same pattern is being followed by Dybala.
It's an analogy about their level of workrate rather than preference of employer.Yeah but that analogy only really works if the teenager only ever wanted to flip burgers at Burger King.
If he really enjoyed flipping burgers, Burger King told him to feck off, and McDonalds said come and flip burgers for us for twice the money...
But they wanted to join their destination teams. Unlike Robinho (who thought he was joining United) and di Maria (who later said he never wanted to come to Manchester at all)Sneijder, Robben, Higuain, Sanchez, Fabregas all didnt want to leave Madrid/Barca but they proved to be superb additions to the team. Not every deal is Di Maria deal. In any case it's nothing like Di Maria, he wanted to sign for PSG and ended up here only because they had FFP issues.
If Dybala wants to sign for someone else and end up here because of some financial issues then we can see the same patters. At this point, it's just he didn't want to leave Juventus but he is told he can leave.
But they wanted to join their destination teams.
The discussion is about whether Dybala doesn't
Man Utd are Juve's choice, not his or his agent's.They joined their destination teams after being forced out of their clubs, just like Dybala is.
If he didn't want to join PL, he wouldn't have sent his agent to negotiate with ManUtd.
Exactly this. People have been really burnt by the Sanchez situation, but the fact is that was an extreme example. 275k is far from unreasonable given Dybala's talent, plus the fact thattg he's well in his rights to expect a pay bump when he's joining the richest club in the world in the richest league in the world.It’s not adding £275k, as Lukaku is currently on £200k. So it is adding £75k. (£3.9m per year).
United aren’t paying Mane, Salah and Kane though. Plus those players have highly incentivised Contracts.
United can afford to pay higher wages than other domestic rivals, that’s just a fact.
The revenue to wage percentage remains at circa 50%, which is a very healthy figure and is better than the revenue/wage percentage of most clubs in the league.
When you earn more money and have much bigger sponsorship deals, you can afford to pay higher wages.
Man Utd are Juve's choice, not his or his agent's.
Dybala is an unwilling makeweight.
He clearly doesn't want to be here, but will probably be forced to, and he'll ask for giga salary to compensate. Top player, always wanted him, but I'll be lying to say I'm enthusiastic about this deal with his stance.
Di Maria and Robinho also signed contracts. That's the point of the comparison. The parallels are uncanny.Deal won't happen without Dybala's approval.
It’s not adding £275k, as Lukaku is currently on £200k. So it is adding £75k. (£3.9m per year).
United aren’t paying Mane, Salah and Kane though. Plus those players have highly incentivised Contracts.
United can afford to pay higher wages than other domestic rivals, that’s just a fact.
The revenue to wage percentage remains at circa 50%, which is a very healthy figure and is better than the revenue/wage percentage of most clubs in the league.
When you earn more money and have much bigger sponsorship deals, you can afford to pay higher wages.
Di Maria and Robinho also signed contracts. That's the point of the comparison. The parallels are uncanny.
It's one thing to leave a club that wants to sell. It's a totally separate thing to join a club that happens to be the only option on the table, leaving no choice but to accept.
Dybala reportedly meets both criteria, hence the cautionary tales to warn us of the precedant.
But equally, nobody knows anything about the truth of the discussions. Everything, short of an offical confirmation, is speculative and hypothetical.No one has any clue about what Dybala wants or doesn't, but the most accurate guesswork is that he must be somewhat willing to join if his agent is involved in discussions with us.
Can everyone in Manchester agree not to rob this guy's house if he comes? Thanks.
Now you're just being silly.There are no parallels and if anything it's close to Robben, Sneijder, Higuain than Di Maria.
He doesn't have to accept, he can reject and stay. Di Maria burned all the bridges fighting with Perez, nothing of that sort has happened with Dybala.
Now you're just being silly.
I'm happy to have a reasonable discussion with someone who disagrees with me in a sensible way. That's fine. But you're being contrary for contrariness' here.
No one has any clue about what Dybala wants or doesn't, but the most accurate guesswork is that he must be somewhat willing to join if his agent is involved in discussions with us.
fecking hell.
Another report saying he doesn't want to join United. Just like di Maria. Is that not a parallel?
If he feels disrespected by Juve and joins the only club he can sign for in order to get out, despite not wanting to be here, would you still accept him?Exactly. If he joins then good. We will have very good player. If he doesn't want to, then we can move on to someone else and we can't blame him as he is settled well at Juventus.
Him sending his agent to negotiate the deal and the rumored contract offer (reported by reliable Juventus journalists) makes it sound like he is willing to join.
I refuse to believe it till it happens because this is an absurdly good deal for us no matter how Dybala plays for us.
This entire thread is based on rumours. And the entire discussion is couched by 'if the reports are true'. Have you missed that?Yeah, next you will be posting news from Sun.
If he feels disrespected by Juve and joins the only club he can sign for in order to get out, despite not wanting to be here, would you still accept him?
This entire thread is based on rumours. And the entire discussion is couched by 'if the reports are true'. Have you missed that?
Many players don't move to clubs they don't want to join. That's the point, and that's why your first sentence is such a doubt.Why not as long as he has motivation to improve himself and the team. Many players move clubs just for higher wages, not because they loved the club and was childhood dream to play for the club.
Another report saying he doesn't want to join United. Just like di Maria. Is that not a parallel?
Many players don't move to clubs they don't want to join. That's the point, and that's why your first sentence is such a doubt.
United are the only offer on the table because Dybala is a makeweight. If his lack of desire to join United is true, any deal will be doomed to your own caveat.
Fair enough. My point isn't about saying that the deal will or won't happen. It's about the wisdom of signing a player who hypothetically doesn't want to come. I've couched every post with that predicate.You're quoting literally the worst italian "sources" here.
Some people are like a dog with a bone here.
If Dybala has no interest then we should expect a firm no very soon indeed and his agent to be flying back after having some nice tea and biscuits.