wtf?
Paul Scholes | 2011/12 Performances
- Thread starter Nate Dogg
- Start date
- Status
Questions: Does anyone actually think that Fergie would've let the club resort to this pre-Glazer? Does anyone think he'd accept having that few options in the middle of the pitch?
I don't think he would, no
Ironic that little City would be bought out and bankrolled with so much money and we get the Glazers and £750m debt
I'd have thought that anyone who had complained already, would be placated somewhat by something being done, as opposed to nothing.
Getting a central midfielder for the future is a separate issue.
no value? only 3-4 players who could improve our cm? Jesus, we are skint as feck.
Exactly, at least he looks to be doing something about it at last
I loathe the Glazers with a passion.
More than I loathe City and Liverpool.
If the price of losing them was to give either of those a PL title, I'd pay it.
Unbelievable...
So do I Livvie. As I said earlier, unbelievable we get saddled with them while city get billionaires
Scholes is never a 'resort' and frankly I like where United are - sticking to our guns with youth, not spending excessively, and letting Ferguson get on with his job.
I'd hate us to have City's owners.
I'd hate us to have City's owners.
Well so would I tbh, I just wish we didn't have the bloody Glazers
Scholes = Brett Favre?
Love to see Scholes and Hargreaves on the pitch.
I'm sure O'Shea doesn't mind.
Beckham would have made more sense
Ideal game with a man off for Scholes to have some minutes.
He's had more influence from the bench on this match than he might have had on the pitch all last season!
I blame Scholes.
I think it's simple, Sir Alex never wanted him to retire, Scholesy eventually changed his mind to come into agreement.
why? they seem not to interfere with the footballing matters (unlike Abramovich) they just provide money and a business plan. As strange as it may sound i would love to have owners like them. United are making enough money to be competitive even with the Glazer's debt (I bet GHQC will soon claim there is no debt at all) so without this burden we would be self-sufficient with a lot to spare. If the owners got their share of money (dividend) and feck off for the rest of the season I would be more than happy.
3-0 up with a man advantage. If there was ever a time to reintroduce him, it might be now... Think he'll make an appearance today?
If it was purely the Glazers withholding money, why did we spend around £50 million in the summer on a goalkeeper, a centre half and another winger and not address the centre of midfield? Surely if Fergie only had £50 million to spend, and thought we had a midfield problem, he'd have used some of that money to address that issue?
That makes way too much sense Nev. cut it out will ya? We don't like that type of logic round these parts!
He's warming up!
He's stripping off!
Just woke up and saw the news. Freakin' thrilled!!!!
Young needs to give up his jersey. LOL.
Agreed, really do not like seeing Scholes wearing 22, although it was what he started his United career with, wasn't it?
Not missed a pass yet, you never lose it. BOOM BABY!
rofl *facepalm*
Bugger
I blame you.
I love Scholes and he was one of the best midfielders the world has ever seen but ....what a farce. Clubs like United shouldn't be bringing legends out of retirement. He's 37 ffs
37 passes , 36 successful, 1 assist. Not bad
Had to think for a sec what assist you were referring to
He started looking more and more like his old self... I'm gladly having him back
Used his experience, kept it simple and helped us keep possession.
- Status