edcunited1878
Full Member
Weird take.
Not all midfielders are great at defending, doesnt make them a passenger. Its not about talent either. Would you say "McFred is a more balanced midfield, although Juan Mata has more talent than those two combined". Its not a question of talent, its a question of position. You shouldnt play an attacking midfielder in a midfield 2. You cannot play players like Grealish, Isco, Pogba, Bruno in a midfield 2 and then be surprised that its not working. And that natural CMs like McT and Fred, give the team more balance.
Its not a question of workrate or effort, its just a square peg/round hole situation.
It does though when you're the only top club that has 2 traditional central midfielders. Pogba isn't combative enough in central midfield and it's easy to mark him out while pushing him farther away from goal or just have players marking him throughout.
The team functioned without Pogba in central midfield better because they provided cover, energy, and pressed high. They won the ball back at higher positions because their central midfield. Their awareness is better than Pogbas.
Pogba isn't just an attacking midfielder, he can be a traditional midfielder, however his awareness and discipline is just lacking....especially as part of a midfield two. In the Premier League, he can be limited and it shows. He's always been surrounded by two other central midfielders for France and Juve, and that's where he excels. United don't play that way and shouldn't when it has shown that they can win without Pogba, in addition to having at least one central midfielder not really that good or well rounded (e.g. McTominay).
Paul Scholes wasn't good at defending, but he wasn't a passenger. Why? Because he was aware of his surroundings and was okay playing the ball "safe" and rarely getting caught in compromising positions. One touch, move, get the ball back, pass, move, boom.